3 minutes ago, Asg 15 said:

Quit using OC

I keep reading Offensive Coordinator and wonder what the hell you're talking about

OC=offensive center? it's pretty common because IOL covers OG's also 

Bet everyone a stale old Twinky Eaggles jersey sales are in the bottom 10% of sales for the 32 teams

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LMAO everyone in "win now" mode' "OH he has to sit a year" lmfao. We needed Kelces replacement and additional; round 6  trash OG wannabe OC's aren't gonna cut it long term (Think 2022 and beyond and GTH out of win now mode) We are just ONE pick away from the SB baby!!!!

2023 and beyond... its why to be honest. I like the 2nd round pick the best so far.... not that I don't like Smith, I still don't like giving Dallas pick 84 or possibly passing up the Bears offer.   This pick was right there where the value for the player was and is on the line.    The only bad thing to me... or negative.... is that it's not the DL... which to me is more pressing need due to the ages of the players.  

 

5 minutes ago, Asg 15 said:

Quit using OC

I keep reading Offensive Coordinator and wonder what the hell you're talking about

I'm trying to throw you off track,and get into your head. It's working perfectly 😁

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

OC=offensive center? it's pretty common because IOL covers OG's also 

Well i've never seen a DC (Defensive Center)

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

2023 and beyond... its why to be honest. I like the 2nd round pick the best so far.... not that I don't like Smith, I still don't like giving Dallas pick 84 or possibly passing up the Bears offer.   This pick was right there where the value for the player was and is on the line.    The only bad thing to me... or negative.... is that it's not the DL... which to me is more pressing need due to the ages of the players.  

 

I have Robinson at DE and Sills at DT at 143 and 188. Need the youth injection,but they dont need to start tomorrow

6 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said:

What the yellow group in Madden is I have no idea. All I do know is the best ability is availability and this guy's had 2 acl's. Acl's take 2 yrs to recoup - a yr to heal and a yr to get back into football. Also know there were some really good players on the board when he was picked. Had to get a WR in the 1st cause they screwed up their top pick last yr. Now teams know all they have to do is pass on us and they'll win cause we went C when we needed CB and pass rush. This "team" can't be great if the FO doesn't get their heads out of their butts, swallow their pride on past mistakes and get someone who can build it right.

Yeah... we would have been feared this year if only we took a CB in round 2.

7 minutes ago, Asg 15 said:

Well i've never seen a DC (Defensive Center)

Me either,doesn't alter the fact it's a common term

5 minutes ago, Asg 15 said:

We might not agree on much but we sure agree on Howie

I agree ... the 2nd round of this draft and finally I realize Howie is a problem....   lol   Forget the dumpster fires of the last 2 seasons ... pick 37 just finally convinced me...lol

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I have Robinson at DE and Sills at DT at 143 and 188. Need the youth injection,but they dont need to start tomorrow

this is where we disagree.   And the main reason I see the team taking steps back after this year

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

this is where we disagree.   And the main reason I see the team taking steps back after this year

Who are you cutting this year for them to start?

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Me either,doesn't alter the fact it's a common term

what about just C  ... would it be confusing with Center in basketball or hockey? 

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Who are you cutting this year for them to start?

Nobody has to start, rotation just like Cox and Graham started out, but just because they don't start doesn't mean you need to keep dropping down the draft to get the guys. 

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

what about just C  ... would it be confusing with Center in basketball or hockey? 

Semantics, you'll live trust me

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Nobody has to start, rotation just like Cox and Graham started out, but just because they don't start doesn't mean you need to keep dropping down the draft to get the guys. 

OK NP so what about CB and LB? also needs or is it your way only? Why can't 143 and 188 do rotations if thats what you want? Still a youth injection no?

10 minutes ago, Asg 15 said:

Well i've never sehen a DC (Defensive Center)

Rudy Goebert from the Utah Jazz

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Semantics, you'll live trust me

all good with me, I know what you mean.

3 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Well i've never sehen a DC (Defensive Center)

the OC plays behind the sehen. I thought everyone knew that

Vikings went qb. Almost there.

SO Cox at 70? or a CB?

Anyway all you guys are in luck because with the Dickerson pick I wont have to bring up the C or OC.I will be dead by then 

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

OK NP so what about CB and LB? also needs or is it your way only? Why can't 143 and 188 do rotations if thats what you want?

IDK, I'm just looking at it like we need a foundation.   To me the lines would be more important at this stage.   OF course it's assuming the players are similar talent.    Barimore would have seemed a better pick in regards of the fact we don't have any youth there... but I have no issue with Dickerson at all.  WE got some young guys we can try out at CB .. draft a later rounder.  I'm not forcing it though.  As I wouldn't for DL either if its not the BPA as our picks come up.  Just for #2 ... if it was DL instead of OL I would have liked it a little better that's all.  

4 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Rudy Goebert from the Utah Jazz

all good with me, I know what you mean.

Mark Eaton

Or am i aging myself?

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Yeah... we would have been feared this year if only we took a CB in round 2.

Just sayin, all you have to do is pass on us and you win. So was a future C - when healthy - the wisest move right now? For me that was a big NO. He wasn't BPA nor did he fill an immediate need. That doesn't mean win now mode. Right now we can barely field a secondary with much more than bodies. Nobody is scared to pass on us. Cox has needed help for yrs as HR's lame FA's got paid and failed and our pass rush is only decent if everyone's healthy. So yeah, get a future C w/ 2 acl's. I wanted a C, and yeah he's good when healthy. Every draftee comes w/ the cost of the players you pass over. We seem to be very god at passing over good players. On that HR is very good.

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

IDK, I'm just looking at it like we need a foundation.   To me the lines would be more important at this stage.   OF course it's assuming the players are similar talent.    Barimore would have seemed a better pick in regards of the fact we don't have any youth there... but I have no issue with Dickerson at all.  WE got some young guys we can try out at CB .. draft a later rounder.  I'm not forcing it though.  As I wouldn't for DL either if its not the BPA as our picks come up.  Just for #2 ... if it was DL instead of OL I would have liked it a little better that's all.  

OK NP. we all have our preferences. Like you though I want the foundation redone before I put the roof on(but I understand the Smith pick)

Kicker w/ broken legs and 3 re-attached toes