Jump to content

Featured Replies

13 games Wentz had what damn near 3300 yards 33 tds 7 ints in 13 games 

Thats Watson on his best season of last year on a losing team always play catch-up so got garbage time stats in terms of Tds and Wentz got it in 13 games 

  • Replies 89.6k
  • Views 2.3m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

  • Author
3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

We are taking Watson with Dhop and Wentz with who???? 

If we are talking Wentz best it’s 2017 you know the year he should have been MVP broke franchise record for Tds in what 13 games with 33. 

60 percent completion percentage. Less than 3,300 yards. Watson destroys those numbers every season he’s played. Try again 

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

And what is the best way to slow all ATL receivers? Run the ball. Time of possession. Basically what should be our gameplan and we should be good at.

You think they can stop us? I’m not scared of their defense.

Should be high scoring. I give our running game the advantage on O. We will need to run on them consistently. I have no idea what Smith and Reagor will do. If they do well we can win. I agree we need to keep the ball away from their O

So question,How on earth can we be interested in Watson when we have no loot to pay him???

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

60 percent completion percentage. Less than 3,300 yards. Watson destroys those numbers every season he’s played. Try again 

33 tds in 13 games whooo 4 yards under 3300 in 13 games. 7 ints 

Wentz has thrown less ints basically every year. He has tied him in Tds in 3 fewer games at 33. Oh and he was winning 

Think you need to try again ham 

  • Author
2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So question,How on earth can we be interested in Watson when we have no loot to pay him???

Easiest answer would involve trading a high price player as part of the deal

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

33 tds in 13 games whooo 4 yards under 3300 in 13 games. 7 ints 

Wentz has thrown less ints basically every year. He has tied him in Tds in 3 fewer games at 33. Oh and he was winning 

Think you need to try again ham 

But why do you keep saying 13 games? That’s what he did in the 2017 season

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Easiest answer would involve trading a high price player as part of the deal

IDK that we have a 35 million dollar player on this roster? I believe we have(after paying the rooks) like 1.5 mil left?

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Easiest answer would involve trading a high price player as part of the deal

But why do you keep saying 13 games? That’s what he did in the 2017 season

Yea in 13 games he didn’t play the final 3 games 

So,I think these "Eagles are interested" in Watson is malarkey. Unless we want to give up next years picks. I think that is the only way. So how would y'all feel about doing that?

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So,I think these "Eagles are interested" in Watson is malarkey. Unless we want to give up next years picks. I think that is the only way. So how would y'all feel about doing that?

I doubt it malarkey sure there is some interest there definitely could be blown out of portion though. But the asking price will likely have to be highway robbery which is looking like the case with Watson. I’m not even sure Texans can get a 1st for him even if cleared 

I think at best Texans get a conditional pick that can turn into a 1st and a 2nd or 3rd  rounder. 

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I doubt it malarkey sure there is some interest there definitely could be blown out of portion though. But the asking price will likely have to be highway robbery which is looking like the case with Watson. I’m not even sure Texans can get a 1st for him even if cleared 

If he is cleared I suspect they keep him. IDK who else they can get or who they have rostered

  • Author
4 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Yea in 13 games he didn’t play the final 3 games 

You said it was his best season. Those are his stats from his best season. His completion percentage of 60 percent....not great. Watson always has done much better than that. Watson always has thrown for more yards than that. Watson just threw for 33 TDs and 7 interceptions this past season. Identical. Watson just doesn’t have the downside games like Wentz. He’s clearly a better athlete. Just all around a better QB. Not even arguable.

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

If he is cleared I suspect they keep him. IDK who else they can get or who they have rostered

Tyrod Taylor, traded for Finley and drafted your boy Mills

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You said it was his best season. Those are his stats from his best season. His completion percentage of 60 percent....not great. Watson always has done much better than that. Watson always has thrown for more yards than that. Watson just threw for 33 TDs and 7 interceptions this past season. Identical. Watson just doesn’t have the downside games like Wentz. He’s clearly a better athlete. Just all around a better QB. Not even arguable.

Having/had Hopkins and Fuller doesn't hurt ANY QB's stats

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You said it was his best season. Those are his stats from his best season. His completion percentage of 60 percent....not great. Watson always has done much better than that. Watson always has thrown for more yards than that. Watson just threw for 33 TDs and 7 interceptions this past season. Identical. Watson just doesn’t have the downside games like Wentz. He’s clearly a better athlete. Just all around a better QB. Not even arguable.

Yea his best season 3300 yards 33 tds 7ints in 13 games 

Watson best season in 16 games he threw for 33 tds... 

So you telling me if Wentz doesn’t play 16 he blows Watson out the water???. And again lots not act like Watson didn’t have Dhop most of his career and even last year he had a 1000 yard WR in Cooks. 

  • Author
1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Having/had Hopkins and Fuller doesn't hurt ANY QB's stats

Having had our Oline wouldn’t hurt any QBs stats either 

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You said it was his best season. Those are his stats from his best season. His completion percentage of 60 percent....not great. Watson always has done much better than that. Watson always has thrown for more yards than that. Watson just threw for 33 TDs and 7 interceptions this past season. Identical. Watson just doesn’t have the downside games like Wentz. He’s clearly a better athlete. Just all around a better QB. Not even arguable.

Tyrod Taylor, traded for Finley and drafted your boy Mills

OK then they could do it. Taylor should be fine for them for now if thats what they wanted to do. With 3 plus Watson, it kinda looks like their plan is to move on. Of course they were preparing for the worst,so who knows? 

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Having had our Oline wouldn’t hurt any QBs stats either 

LOL we don't have a clue,they are all a year older now and last year was a nightmare

Will Fuller was on par for 1000 yards as well if he didn’t get suspended after 11 games. But we don’t want to talk about the difference in weapons between the QBs and the fact Wentz has been putting up identical stats most his career no why would we lol

10 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So,I think these "Eagles are interested" in Watson is malarkey. Unless we want to give up next years picks. I think that is the only way. So how would y'all feel about doing that?

Hell no!

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Having had our Oline wouldn’t hurt any QBs stats either 

You mean the injured Ol we have had the last 2-3 years 

  • Author
1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

OK then they could do it. 

LOL we don't have a clue,they are all a year older now and last year was a nightmare

Oh it’s been clear it’s happening.

the Oline was referring to the past. You brought up Watson’s receivers. I mentioned how Wentz had a great Oline. I should also add the TE position. As Ertz has been the third best TE ....plus Goedert, Celek and Burton in there early career.

Just now, EaglesTD123 said:

Hell no!

And yes, even if Watson DIDN'T have legal probs. 

  • Author
3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Will Fuller was on par for 1000 yards as well if he didn’t get suspended after 11 games. But we don’t want to talk about the difference in weapons between the QBs and the fact Wentz has been putting up identical stats most his career no why would we lol

But Wentz hasn’t been. Watson has been better. You say Watson had better receivers. I say Wentz had a great Oline, better TEs and RBs.....and coaching.

4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Oh it’s been clear it’s happening.

the Oline was referring to the past. You brought up Watson’s receivers. I mentioned how Wentz had a great Oline. I should also add the TE position. As Ertz has been the third best TE ....plus Goedert, Celek and Burton in there early career.

The "past" is last year. I'm not going back to the 85 Bears defense to say ours is as good(which there is NO WAY) lol. You are only as good as your LAST GAME

  • Author
2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

You mean the injured Ol we have had the last 2-3 years 

Last year the Oline was terrible. Before that? Much better than the Texans. Kelce, Brooks, Johnson and Peters. Four pro bowlers. Name a Texan Oline? Yeah only the one they just traded for giving up the third pick in the draft.

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

The "past" is last year. I'm not going back to the 85 Bears defense to say ours is as good lol. You are only as good as your LAST GAME

Comparing Wentz and Watson career. Not sure what you are talking about?

  • Author

I’d choose Watson all day long over Wentz. Before the accusations happened Watson looked to have a dozen suitors. Wentz had two.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.