Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Last year the Oline was terrible. Before that? Much better than the Texans. Kelce, Brooks, Johnson and Peters. Four pro bowlers. Name a Texan Oline? Yeah only the one they just traded for giving up the third pick in the draft.

Comparing Wentz and Watson career. Not sure what you are talking about?

Our O line. The "past" is last year only. These guys are another year older too lets remember.What gas is left in those tanks? I have no clue. So how would Watson have fared with last years O line?

  • Replies 89.6k
  • Views 2.3m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

  • Author
4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

The "past" is last year. I'm not going back to the 85 Bears defense to say ours is as good lol. You are only as good as your LAST GAME

Last year Watson didn’t have Hopkins so that doesn’t even make sense.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Last year Watson didn’t gave Hopkins so that doesn’t even make sense.

We didn't have ANYONE except PS WR's. How would Watson do with last years O line and PS WR's?

Yes with a crap O line let's go for it on 4th and 4 (lmao) Now IDK if that was Ped or calls in from the upper deck,but Watson would have been crap here last year too

  • Author
1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

We didn't have ANYONE except PS WR's. How would Watson do with last years O line and PS WR's?

He did have his number one target in Ertz. Also had an excellent second TE in Goedert. Let’s not get crazy making excuses for Wentz. I believe part of that problem with receivers is that Wentz can’t develop them. JJAW isn’t that bad. Wentz had to throw him jump balls. That’s his thing. But you can’t come down with something that never arrives.

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yes with a crap O line let's go for it on 4th and 4 (lmao) Now IDK if that was Ped or calls in from the upper deck,but Watson would have been crap here last year too

But....Watson hasn’t had a good Oline the whole time.

  • Author

Brady did fine utilizing Gronk. No need to make excuses for him because he didn’t have any WR that could play out wide.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

But....Watson hasn’t had a good Oline the whole time.

And I am saying we have zero clue what this O line will look like. If Brooks goes down again how good can we be? He was the major "we miss you" last year. If he's out the running game tanks

  • Author
1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

And I am saying we have zero clue what this O line will look like. If Brooks goes down again how good can we be? He was the major "we miss you" last year. If he's out the running game tanks

Nah, we have several G. Wouldn’t surprise me if we trade Brooks

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Brady did fine utilizing Gronk. No need to make excuses for him because he didn’t have any WR that could play out wide.

Brady always had a top rate WR. Welker anyone? He has top flight WR's in TB,so IDK what you are getting at?

  • Author

We have the rookie, Herbig, Seumalo, Opeta, Driscoll.....

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Brady always had a top rate WR. Welker anyone? He has top flight WR's in TB,so IDK what you are getting at?

Was Welker top flight? I think Brady made him that.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Nah, we have several G. Wouldn’t surprise me if we trade Brooks

Who is at G? Mailiata? Driscoll? We don;t even know what the starting line up looks like lol,but ALL HAIL to the dominant O line? I'm not buying that yet

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We have the rookie, Herbig, Seumalo, Opeta, Driscoll.....

Was Welker top flight? I think Brady made him that.

He was better than Jjaw?

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

We have the rookie, Herbig, Seumalo, Opeta, Driscoll...

Right,so which of those is starting game 1?(assuming Brooks goes away)

  • Author
Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Right,so which of those is starting game 1?

I’d go Seumalo and Herbig. Feel good about it also.

Who is starting at LOT? See you have no idea what this O line will be or how good it will be

  • Author

Driscoll might be better than Herbig. Really like him. He showed really well at RT. But I thought Herbig held his own. He’s not a weakness at the least. Might not dominate.

I will wait and see who starts, how they play together before anointing them. Too many questions right now for me

  • Author
1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Who is starting at LOT? See you have no idea what this O line will be or how good it will be

I was talking about the past. But this is a different subject. I think Lane, Dillard, Mailata and Driscoll can play LT well.

BTW Welker was a great slot guy. Always gave Brady a window. Pretty much if you give any QB that window short,any competent QB will hit him(see Avant)

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I was talking about the past. But this is a different subject. I think Lane, Dillard, Mailata and Driscoll can play LT well.

Like I said,the O line is only as good as their last game. Now we have no idea who plays, so I will need to see how they play together before I can say we have a good O line 

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

BTW Welker was a great slot guy. Always gave Brady a window. Pretty much if you give any QB that window short,any competent QB will hit him(see Avant)

This was supposedly why we drafted Jjaw and he cant get open. He is no Welker

  • Author
2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

BTW Welker was a great slot guy. Always gave Brady a window. Pretty much if you give any QB that window short,any competent QB will hit him(see Avant)

Yet he only went for 600 yards on other teams instead of 1200

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Yet he only went for 600 yards on other teams instead of 1200

Maybe they had other options???? Like REAL WR's? IDK 600 yards were gained by NOONE on this team last year, NOONE! With 600 yards he would have been our top receiver

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

But Wentz hasn’t been. Watson has been better. You say Watson had better receivers. I say Wentz had a great Oline, better TEs and RBs.....and coaching.

Better RBs who??? Lamar Miller has been on par with anyone we have had so has Johnson.

TEs yup he had Ertz. Watson only had Dhop, Fuller, Cooks. Wentz has had 1 player go over 1000 yards in his career Watson has had a 1000 yard guy every year in the league. 

I’m just saying if the Eagles and Cardinals wanted to do a Ertz for Hicks swap I’d be 1000000% behind it. 

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

But Wentz hasn’t been. Watson has been better. You say Watson had better receivers. I say Wentz had a great Oline, better TEs and RBs.....and coaching.

Due to injuries noone had a worse O line than Wentz in 2020

 

Saying Steven Nelson market is strong Eagles are one of 14 teams apparently interested in signing the CB 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.