Jump to content

Featured Replies

some nsfw language...because it's bannon...

 

 

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Views 123.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

 

  • Author
14 minutes ago, vikas83 said:

 

6tW.gif.fa67232e5df77ce2f5845d9d550f2905.gif

Another Trump lie discredited. The March on the Capitol was pre planned and premediated. 

 

https://news.yahoo.com/trump-team-knew-surprise-call-194600154.html

The Jan. 6 committee revealed texts on Tuesday from rally organizers discussing plans to have Donald Trump direct protesters to march to the Capitol or Supreme Court.

The committee displayed a text exchange from Jan. 4 between White House Ellipse rally organizer Kylie Kremer and MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell in which the pair discussed secret plans to have Trump call for protesters to march to a second location, either the Supreme Court or Capitol on Jan. 6. Kremer urges Lindell to keep the plans secret, since they did not have permits for the march.

Organizers of the Jan. 6 rally at the Ellipse have continually denied culpability for the Capitol violence, saying that the two were unconnected and that Trump’s call to have people march on the Capitol was unprompted and unscripted. The revelations Tuesday demonstrate this line has always been a lie, as multiple members of Trump’s team — as well as organizers of the White House rally —  had full knowledge he’d direct people to the Capitol.

In March, Rolling Stone reported that Scott Johnson, another organizer of the White House rally, overheard Mark Meadows, and Katrina Pierson, speaking over the phone with Kylie Kremer, about plans for the Jan. 6 rally. Johnson said that the three discussed the possibility of obtaining a permit to have protesters march from the Ellipse to the Capitol. Ultimately, the group planned to "direct the people down there and make it look like they went down there on their own,” Johnson told Rolling Stone.

 

My Pillow Guy Trump Butt Pillow - Meme - Shut Up And Take My Money

1 hour ago, vikas83 said:

 

Trump's pre planned fall guy. LOL. It wasn't me it was Eastman. It wasn't me it was Meadows. He blames everyone else but himself. 

11 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said:

Trump's pre planned fall guy. LOL. It wasn't me it was Eastman. It wasn't me it was Meadows. He blames everyone else but himself. 

Yeah, but if Meadows goes down Trump's F'd.  He'll flip on him in a heartbeat.

3 hours ago, jsdarkstar said:

He blames everyone else but himself. 

It would appear he has that in common with Biden.

3 hours ago, VanHammersly said:

Yeah, but if Meadows goes down Trump's F'd.  He'll flip on him in a heartbeat.

They are still going to need something physical. Emails, recordings, etc. 

Let's say for the sake of argument they convince the DOJ (which they haven't managed yet) of going forward with a circumstantial case.

Let's also say it makes it to court and they are rolling the dice like a winning night at the casino. They manage to seat 12 people who live on hourly dosing of all things progressive and the jury doesn't even have to go to a recess to render a guilty verdict. 

He would never spend a night in jail.

11 hours ago, Dave Moss said:

It’s a made up term.  Created solely for the purpose of pandering.

😏

Truth is that it's just the butchering of another language (based on masculine and feminine) to fit their weird world view.

  • Author

DoJ won't go forward with a case against a former president on circumstantial evidence.

They'll have something concrete.

19 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

DoJ won't go forward with a case against a former president on circumstantial evidence.

They'll have something concrete.

As I understand it the DOJ has made repeated request for evidence that have been denied despite calls for Garland to move forward.

6 hours ago, VanHammersly said:

Yeah, but if Meadows goes down Trump's F'd.  He'll flip on him in a heartbeat.

We’ll see.  I’m not convinced the DOJ is going to go after anyone yet.

 

This behavior by Trump linked to the timing of the vote counting was discussed at length even before the election.  Hearing Bannon talk about it is interesting though.

 

 

  • Author
10 hours ago, lynched1 said:

As I understand it the DOJ has made repeated request for evidence that have been denied despite calls for Garland to move forward.

The DoJ made on blanket request for all transcripts and were told not yet by the Jan 6 committee because the investigation was still in progress. The Jan 6 committee is now starting a dialogue with the DoJ to establish the process for sharing evidence. 

9 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

The DoJ made on blanket request for all transcripts and were told not yet by the Jan 6 committee because the investigation was still in progress. The Jan 6 committee is now starting a dialogue with the DoJ to establish the process for sharing evidence. 

After the idiot crap-shows of the impeachments, perhaps they have learned not to shoot before you have all the details.

Good Lord:

Quote

Donald Trump is a garbage can brought to life. He is the bottom of a dumpster that hasn't been cleaned for a lifetime, sprung to life as a living pestilence. He appeals to your darker angels. He gives people permission to be as horrible as they want to be. The Jan. 6 hearings are slowly backing him into a corner, connecting the dots and exposing his vicious, seditious activities for the anti-democratic crap they truly are.

 

7 minutes ago, vikas83 said:

Good Lord:

 

This guy gets it.

noob-god-damn.gif

5 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

The DoJ made on blanket request for all transcripts and were told not yet by the Jan 6 committee because the investigation was still in progress. The Jan 6 committee is now starting a dialogue with the DoJ to establish the process for sharing evidence. 

My point being is this calling for Garland to do something despite not providing him with anything to analyze has been going on for some time now

 

  • Author
17 minutes ago, lynched1 said:

My point being is this calling for Garland to do something despite not providing him with anything to analyze has been going on for some time now

 

There's nothing that's stopping the DoJ from doing its own investigation. And the DoJ has much more legal authority to lean on people to comply with their investigations, vs congress whose authority to compel people to testify is much more limited.

That said, the DoJ is pretty busy prosecuting the deplorables from Jan 6, including Bannon. And it sounds like Meadows is on deck. Inching closer.

You don't bring down the head of a mafia organization by starting at the top. It's a long incremental process that requires knocking down dominos and pressuring them to cooperate as investigators climb the ladder.

Just now, JohnSnowsHair said:

There's nothing that's stopping the DoJ from doing its own investigation. And the DoJ has much more legal authority to lean on people to comply with their investigations, vs congress whose authority to compel people to testify is much more limited.

That said, the DoJ is pretty busy prosecuting the deplorables from Jan 6, including Bannon. And it sounds like Meadows is on deck. Inching closer.

You don't bring down the head of a mafia organization by starting at the top. It's a long incremental process that requires knocking down dominos and pressuring them to cooperate as investigators climb the ladder.

I mean, the DOJ is doing its own investigation as well. It's just that the DOJ keeps things very quiet.

  • Author
1 minute ago, vikas83 said:

I mean, the DOJ is doing its own investigation as well. It's just that the DOJ keeps things very quiet.

Right. And most often when they bring a case, it's as airtight as they come.

Create an account or sign in to comment