Trump continues to commit Crimes.

A top Wisconsin election official says Trump called him last week urging him to decertify Biden's 2020 election win in the state

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-called-top-wisconsin-election-014425625.html

17 hours ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Another cultist willing to fall on the sword for a reality game show host. 

 

 

That's the type of stuff that would get a normal person with access to that type of data in jail immediately. The corruption of the Trump administration was off the charts man.

https://news.yahoo.com/secret-service-deleted-jan-6-text-messages-after-house-requested-them-211753131.html

 

 

The Secret Service erased text messages that could help verify, or rebut, some of the most stunning testimony about President Donald Trump’s actions during the insurrection of Jan. 6, 2021.

Secret Service officials say the wiped messages were part of a prescheduled "reset” of their phones. But House lawmakers have cast doubt on that explanation for the missing messages, which cover critical moments leading up to and through the Jan. 6 insurrection.

Perhaps there's access to an off site server that may provide the answers they require 

3 minutes ago, lynched1 said:

Perhaps there's access to an off site server that may provide the answers they require 

I wonder if any earlier texts were deleted. And if not, the deletions would seem specific and purposeful, correct? 

I always assumed the carrier would have a record of SMS exchanges, at least for some amount of time. 

4 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

I always assumed the carrier would have a record of SMS exchanges, at least for some amount of time. 

They do, but the problem is, we're talking about messages that are over 18 months old. They might still have message logs (sender, receiver, timestamp, etc) but the actual message content is almost certainly long gone. Those are kept for like 30 days and then purged. Would be a ton of data to persist for this length of time for every single user on the network.

1 hour ago, Boogyman said:

I wonder if any earlier texts were deleted. And if not, the deletions would seem specific and purposeful, correct? 

I'm certain it was nothing but personal correspondence. Vacation scheduling, dry cleaning, honey do list.

9 hours ago, lynched1 said:

I'm certain it was nothing but personal correspondence. Vacation scheduling, dry cleaning, honey do list.

I'm certain you are certain of that.

check Anthony Weiner’s laptop

One would have thought that the devices were standard issued Secret Service devices and that they would be subject to automatic data collection over to a central Secret Service data repository.  Worst case, they surely had some sort of backup process/policy in place pre wipe that was required to run in order to collect/archive the required official data.  The only other answer would be that they don't actually ever intend to document/archive this type of official communication in the Secret Service and that it would be their official policy not to do so (not even sure that is legal for them).

Note: There are plenty of tools/solutions out there that can facilitate the automatic capture of data like this from organization issues devices.  The Secret Service absolutely has these types of tools as well though I have no idea what they use them for overall (they have various uses in multiple use cases).

 

42 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

I'm certain you are certain of that.

Drunky McGee has lots of certainty, but matches it well with hogsheads of stupidity and ignorance.

I think lynched was trying to make a joke about Hillary’s e-mails.

49 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

I think lynched was trying to make a joke about Hillary’s e-mails.

His jokes are almost as bad as your jokes

Your saddy face reactions are almost as good as your smiley ones, maybe even better

Just now, DrPhilly said:

His jokes are almost as bad as your jokes

We can’t all be Arthur Jackson

Just now, Dave Moss said:

We can’t all be Arthur Jackson

Yeah, I like that clone.  One of yours?

Just now, DrPhilly said:

Yeah, I like that clone.  One of yours?

No, my two clone accounts are NOTW and Paul

Just now, Dave Moss said:

No, my two clone accounts are NOTW and Paul

Yeah, and mine are Vikas and Vanhammersly

1 hour ago, DrPhilly said:

One would have thought that the devices were standard issued Secret Service devices and that they would be subject to automatic data collection over to a central Secret Service data repository.  Worst case, they surely had some sort of backup process/policy in place pre wipe that was required to run in order to collect/archive the required official data.  The only other answer would be that they don't actually ever intend to document/archive this type of official communication in the Secret Service and that it would be their official policy not to do so (not even sure that is legal for them).

Note: There are plenty of tools/solutions out there that can facilitate the automatic capture of data like this from organization issues devices.  The Secret Service absolutely has these types of tools as well though I have no idea what they use them for overall (they have various uses in multiple use cases).

Texts like this don't disappear without someone specifically disappearing them.

This is different from a technical perspective from what Hillary got crap for. She was effectively using her personal email for government business, and her personal email then ended up as a mix of personal and government content. Never should have happened, she should have been forced to only use a .gov email for any work she did on behalf of the US, because in that situation the email server was controlled by Hillary's organization.

Assuming these phones the SS was using were government issued, which maybe they weren't but I assumed they were, if those texted really were disappeared that's a sign of a serious coverup.

1 minute ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

Texts like this don't disappear without someone specifically disappearing them.

That's pretty much my point.

Just now, DrPhilly said:

That's pretty much my point.

Yes. I was concurring and adding some additional thoughts around how it relates to Hillarygate.

9 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

Yes. I was concurring and adding some additional thoughts around how it relates to Hillarygate.

Yeah, but what if the Secret Service texts show up on Anthony Weiner’s laptop?

2 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

Yeah, but what if the Secret Service texts show up on Anthony Weiner’s laptop?

I think you're just looking for an excuse to say Weiner

11 minutes ago, mikemack8 said:

Apparently the National Archives are pretty upset as well, but lets post stupid memes about it.