Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Views 123.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

  • Author

Seriously, the federalist? Might as well be sharing the gateway pundit or the daily kos. Same trash. 

lmao conservative publication publishes conservative articles. Shocking revelation. Guess that means they made the entire story up. :lol: :roll: 

16 hours ago, mayanh8 said:

All beer is garbage.

That's right I said it.

judging by your avatar i'm guessing lime hard seltzer is your choice, which means you're not eligible to mock another person's alcoholic beverage choice. ever. 

2 minutes ago, Kz! said:

lmao conservative publication publishes conservative articles. Shocking revelation. Guess that means they made the entire story up. :lol: :roll: 

Trumpbot is super salty nobody's taking his tabloid rag with one of the worst track records ever seen seriously. Shocking revelation. :lol:

17 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Trumpbot is super salty nobody's taking his tabloid rag with one of the worst track records ever seen seriously. Shocking revelation. :lol:

Not Listening Friends Tv GIF

lmao the star of season 1 rightly called the show trial a joke. cope and seethe, little loser.

 

3 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Not Listening Friends Tv GIF

lmao the star of season 1 rightly called the show trial a joke. cope and seethe, little loser.

 

"Because the federalist said so, and they're never wrong. Please believe me!"

giphy-downsized-large.gif

"It can't be true, it just can't. I'll wait for msnbc to report on it!"

:roll: 

  • Author
49 minutes ago, Kz! said:

lmao conservative publication publishes conservative articles. Shocking revelation. Guess that means they made the entire story up. :lol: :roll: 

Screen-Shot-2022-07-26-at-1.46.58-AM-1024x719.png

 

'dis you?

"It can't be true" says the guy who maintains Hutchinson's sworn testimony under the penalty of perjury is all fabricated, but this summary of alleged chats with her friends is totally legit and valid.

Literally the dumbest, loneliest human to have ever lived and we're fortunate enough to have a front row seat to witness all his failures in real-time. :roll:

1 minute ago, we_gotta_believe said:

"It can't be true" says the guy who maintains Hutchinson's sworn testimony under the penalty of perjury is all fabricated, but this summary of alleged chats with her friends is totally legit and valid.

Literally the dumbest, loneliest human to have ever lived and we're fortunate enough to have a front row seat to witness all his failures in real-time. :roll:

It's OK, buddy. I realize the J6 committee has surpassed the coronavirus as what you consider a personality for yourself. Season one's super serial witness admitted the entire thing was a joke and a sham. Time to try to develop a real personality that's not built on the political party you identify with. This one's not working out for you. :lol: :roll: 

As opposed to the personality of begging strangers to mock him on the internet because his actual life is devoid of purpose and meaningful human interaction. :lol:

Just now, we_gotta_believe said:

As opposed to the personality of begging strangers to mock him on the internet because his actual life is devoid of purpose and meaningful human interaction. :lol:

As opposed to overcompensating in CVON for feelings of physical inadequacy in real life. :lol:  

Foreveralone GIFs | Tenor

1 minute ago, Kz! said:

As opposed to overcompensating in CVON for feelings of physical inadequacy in real life. :lol:  

You're right, I should instead try to overcompensate by bragging about going to Hanson concerts and buying lawn mowers. :roll: 

Regardless of what they say in private texts, their lawyers are advising them what to do when they testify under oath. It doesn’t surprise me one bit that they would disparage the committee in private.

1 minute ago, Dave Moss said:

Regardless of what they say in private texts, their lawyers are advising them what to do when they testify under oath. It doesn’t surprise me one bit that they would disparage the committee in private.

Clearly your TDS is prohibiting you from coming to the perfectly reasonable conclusions that these chats are clear evidence that she perjured herself. Maybe one day you'll finally wake up and open your eyes after you've been red-pilled, Dave.

8 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

You're right, I should instead try to overcompensate by bragging about going to Hanson concerts and buying lawn mowers. :roll: 

No, you definitely should develop a personality that doesn't allow people online to correctly peg you as a manlet without ever having met you. :lol: :roll: 

1 minute ago, Kz! said:

No, you definitely should develop a personality that doesn't allow people online to correctly peg you as a manlet without ever having met you. :lol: :roll: 

You want it to be true so bad, so all your L's over the years didn't come in vain. :lol: 

8 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

Regardless of what they say in private texts, their lawyers are advising them what to do when they testify under oath. It doesn’t surprise me one bit that they would disparage the committee in private.

Oh, totally agree. I'm sure in private she's free to talk to friends about how she truly feels. When she's under the microscope with the very fair and balanced J6 committee, there's no doubt she feels immense pressure to conform her story to fit the audience. These are people with the ability to ruin both her personal and professional life, there's no way she's going to step out of line like she would talking among friends.  

1 minute ago, we_gotta_believe said:

You want it to be true so bad, so all your L's over the years didn't come in vain. :lol: 

You literally confirmed you were a little manlet in here dude. :lol: 

Did you forget?

3 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Oh, totally agree. I'm sure in private she's free to talk to friends about how she truly feels. When she's under the microscope with the very fair and balanced J6 committee, there's no doubt she feels immense pressure to conform her story to fit the audience. These are people with the ability to ruin both her personal and professional life, there's no way she's going to step out of line like she would talking among friends.  

"She clearly perjured herself to avoid hurting their feelings!" :roll: 

Quote

You literally confirmed you were a little manlet in here dude. :lol: 

Did you forget?

Just like you confirmed you were 5'8"? Yes I do remember that. Would very much track that someone so obsessed with height is actually shorter than me and it's been projection the entire time.

5 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Oh, totally agree. I'm sure in private she's free to talk to friends about how she truly feels. When she's under the microscope with the very fair and balanced J6 committee, there's no doubt she feels immense pressure to conform her story to fit the audience. These are people with the ability to ruin both her personal and professional life, there's no way she's going to step out of line like she would talking among friends.  

:roll:  So much cope in one paragraph.  When she's in front of the committee, she's under oath.  There's actual consequences to lying under oath, which is why all the BS that you post on here is never mentioned under oath.

4 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Oh, totally agree. I'm sure in private she's free to talk to friends about how she truly feels. When she's under the microscope with the very fair and balanced J6 committee, there's no doubt she feels immense pressure to conform her story to fit the audience. These are people with the ability to ruin both her personal and professional life, there's no way she's going to step out of line like she would talking among friends.  

You literally confirmed you were a little manlet in here dude. :lol: 

Did you forget?

I’ll take someone’s words under oath when the penalty is perjury over what they say in private texts any day of the week.  We’d be stupid not to.  Remember, most of these people have already given hours of recorded testimony before they appear in person.

4 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

"She clearly perjured herself to avoid hurting their feelings!" :roll: 

I literally wrote she probably did it in the very next sentence, but instead you went to your go to ****-quoting. Holy ish, this manlet gets more retarded every time he posts. :lol: :roll: 

6 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Just like you confirmed you were 5'8"? Yes I do remember that. Would very much track that someone so obsessed with height is actually shorter than me and it's been projection the entire time.

I never said I was 5'8 lmao. You did say you were 5'9 which is manlet territory in and of itself, but it's also doubtful you are actually being truthful there and not giving yourself a few inches. I'm still capping you at 5'7 max. :lol: 

6 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

:roll:  So much cope in one paragraph.  When she's in front of the committee, she's under oath.  There's actual consequences to lying under oath, which is why all the BS that you post on here is never mentioned under oath.

lmao talk about cope. Look, I know the star witness privately sharing her true feelings about the committee is a blow to you, but it is what it is. She thinks the whole thing is a joke, and I think most people tend to agree. Sorry, bud. :lol: 

Create an account or sign in to comment