Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Kz! said:

It's been substantiated by the NY Times little man. :lol: 

Soy consumption is associated with decreased levels of mental acuity so you can get a pass.

Why are you so upset today?

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Views 123.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

  • Author

Weird that the nation's highest law enforcement agency would be so daring as to establish informants in a group that has committed political violence in the past and who was at the forefront of a neo-fascist movement in support of Trump.

What's next, FBI informants in the mob? How are criminals and seditionists supposed to exist if they're constantly being scrutinized by the FBI?

cry-baby-sad.gif.e6b8c4df7c623752ee0f213bad6348f1.gif

9 hours ago, VanHammersly said:

 

:roll:

What were the stipulations of his appearance? Thought so.

11 minutes ago, lynched1 said:

What were the stipulations of his appearance? Thought so.

That he tell the truth? I can see where that might be a problem. 

17 minutes ago, lynched1 said:

What were the stipulations of his appearance? Thought so.

If he wanted a live hearing he could’ve asked for it. He didn’t ask for anything and instead just didn’t show up because he’s a huge poosay. :lol:

25 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said:

That he tell the truth? I can see where that might be a problem. 

Get your eyes checked. You'd have to had read my previous responses. 

Catch up when you get time 

24 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

If he wanted a live hearing he could’ve asked for it. He didn’t ask for anything and instead just didn’t show up because he’s a huge poosay. :lol:

He could have but didn't have to ask. They knew the terms from previous statements. 

All they had to do was put it  out there the hearings would be public and he's boxed in. They didn't. 

They can do it or not. Not a whole lot they can do about it otherwise.

tic toc, tic toc.

5 hours ago, Tnt4philly said:

JFC you buy this crap!!!!  😂😂😂😂😂😂

All he had to do was say "no".

Nancy Reagan

49 minutes ago, lynched1 said:

All he had to do was say "no".

Nancy Reagan

Except that we all know that would most likely be a lie. Most people prefer not to to commit perjury. 

1 hour ago, lynched1 said:

Get your eyes checked. You'd have to had read my previous responses. 

Catch up when you get time 

My response was to the post I replied, nothing more nothing less. I’m not going to sift through all of your conspiracy theory BS and try to decipher what your twisted mind really meant. The only reason trump won’t man up and testify is that he is a lying POS and would most certainly perjure himself. 

17 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said:

Most people prefer not to to commit perjury. 

That would be a lie.

10 minutes ago, lynched1 said:

That would be a lie.

Just because you are indifferent to the truth does not mean the rest of the world is. 
 

A prime example of "people who prefer not to commit perjury,” Trump lawyers in regards to the election fraud lie. They told one story outside the court room, and a different under oath. They may have been gullible enough to represent the man, but drew the line at perjury. 

1 minute ago, Tnt4philly said:

Just because you are indifferent to the truth does not mean the rest of the world is. 
 

A prime example of "people who prefer not to commit perjury,” Trump lawyers in regards to the election fraud lie. They told one story outside the court room, and a different under oath. They may have been gullible enough to represent the man, but drew the line at perjury. 

Prime examples of contradictory proof.

"It wasn't me"

"I don't know who did that"

"I wasn't speeding"

"Pandemic of the unvaccinated"

 

 

Up to eight "assets" infiltrated a group at the event....

That tells me at the very least they knew.

Pelosi declined offers of additional security.

Did the FBI tell her/them or were they staked sheep?

 

Pretty much sums it up.

21 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Pretty much sums it up.

Stop smoking Mike Lindell's stash.

23 minutes ago, dawkins4prez said:

Stop smoking Mike Lindell's stash.

You mean Lindell nut cheese

  • Author
59 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Pretty much sums it up.

The only thing missing is same as always: any evidence whatsoever to back up the claims.

Literally the only thing that came out is that the FBI had informants. 

There's nothing to suggest they knew what those at the top of these groups were planning. And the only communication about J6 happened from one of the informants as the violence was happening.

As usual MAGA world is going to manufacture a narrative around this that transfers blame from themselves to a politically convenient target, and seized upon bty moronic rubes like yourself eager to relieve the cognitive dissonance and emotional pain of seeing your chosen orange God turn the Republican brand toxic for an entire generation with suburban women thrown in for good measure.

5 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

The only thing missing is same as always: any evidence whatsoever to back up the claims.

Literally the only thing that came out is that the FBI had informants. 

There's nothing to suggest they knew what those at the top of these groups were planning. And the only communication about J6 happened from one of the informants as the violence was happening.

As usual MAGA world is going to manufacture a narrative around this that transfers blame from themselves to a politically convenient target, and seized upon bty moronic rubes like yourself eager to relieve the cognitive dissonance and emotional pain of seeing your chosen orange God turn the Republican brand toxic for an entire generation with suburban women thrown in for good measure.

The vice president of the organization that was responsible for planning and actually infiltrating the capitol was a federal informant, you ****. This isn't low level nobodies who aren't privy to what's being discussed. It's literally the very top of the organization. :lol: 

7 hours ago, Kz! said:

Pretty much sums it up.

:lol:  My favorite part of this drivel is "Trump wanted more security".  Yeah, the guy that didn't want his attendees at the rally screened for weapons and who watched TV and tweeted during the insurrection instead of calling in the National Guard wanted more security. :roll:

The FBI did try to warn Secret Service.

Fe-BQAvXEBI6rop?format=jpg&name=large

 

The narrative that Trump wanted more security but was rebuffed is, of course, complete horseshit. This was confirmed when multiple sources have gone under oath and testified that Trump wanted people who were armed to be let through security. "They aren't here to hurt me."

Just now, VanHammersly said:

:lol:  My favorite part of this drivel is "Trump wanted more security".  Yeah, the guy that didn't want his attendees at the rally screened for weapons and who watched TV and tweeted during the insurrection instead of calling in the National Guard wanted more security. :roll:

His idiot supporters believe it all.

1 minute ago, VanHammersly said:

:lol:  My favorite part of this drivel is "Trump wanted more security".  Yeah, the guy that didn't want his attendees at the rally screened for weapons and who watched TV and tweeted during the insurrection instead of calling in the National Guard wanted more security. :roll:

beat me to it

1 minute ago, Toastrel said:

His idiot supporters believe it all.

But not a cult. 

3 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said:

But not a cult. 

No, not at all. We're just brainwashed by the liberal media.

Like Fox.

And the New York Post.

All those liberal cultist media outlets.

Create an account or sign in to comment