2 minutes ago, Kz! said:

To be clear, millions of dollars of damage occurred in DC during the riots, a secret service shack, and an historic church near the white house was burned to the ground in the lawlessness of that riot. This was in addition to the 150 secret service members injured in the violence and mayhem. 

 

We know this.  What We want you to tell us, is how this is worse than disrupting Congress in session by breaking and entering. 

You would have a decent comparison if say the BLM rioters breeched the white house, they didn't however.  So see?  ITS NOT THE SAME THING!!!!!

17 minutes ago, Outlaw said:

I just can't comprehend how anyone with any semblance of rational thought can't look at both BLM and 1/6 and say, "yep, both disgusting arseholes." ANYone engaged in violence in either instance deserve anything that comes their way.

disgusting arseholes? Thankfully it was just "a few" of them amirite?

Just now, we_gotta_believe said:

disgusting arseholes? Thankfully it was just "a few" of them amirite?

Yes, same as those who committed actual violence in the BLM protests. Out of the overall sizes of the crowds involved, it was small percentages that perpetrated violent acts, thank god.

Just now, 4for4EaglesNest said:

But there was a speech yesterday.  And music....

Don't forget the candlelight vigil.

4 minutes ago, Outlaw said:

Yes, same as those who committed actual violence in the BLM protests. Out of the overall sizes of the crowds involved, it was small percentages that perpetrated violent acts, thank god.

You could even say because the riots had such minimal violence committed by just a "few" people that in totality they were quite "mild" even?

2 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

But there was a speech yesterday.  And music....

When you're wondering why Biden won a second term, I'll save posts like this as a reminder.

4 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

You could even say because the riots had such minimal violence committed by just a "few" people that in totality they were quite "mild" even?

In terms of totality of violent acts and collateral damage, do you really want to put the aggregate of the summer of 2020 versus 1/6 in that regard? In reality, 1/6 was worse than what Repubs say and not as bad as Dems portray it. As usual, the truth lies somewhere in the middle.

3 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

When you're wondering why Biden won a second term, I'll save posts like this as a reminder.

Should probably make sure he even survives to 2024 before you start talking about term 2.

39 minutes ago, DiPros said:

We know this.  What We want you to tell us, is how this is worse than disrupting Congress in session by breaking and entering. 

You would have a decent comparison if say the BLM rioters breeched the white house, they didn't however.  So see?  ITS NOT THE SAME THING!!!!!

How is lighting buildings on fire worse than breaking and entering? That's your question?

 

1 hour ago, Toastrel said:

To overturn an election? No, no they did not. Possibly this is a crucial distinction to people who care about the peaceful transfer of power.

lets say there's basically no security there that day like on 1/6, you don't think these POS's would've tried to breach the white house ? 

would that have overturned an election ? no, but its just as bad. what the left did in those riots is inexcusable. 

 

the only correct response for anyone is admitting the right & left both displayed disgusting acts. period. no but..but...but the other side. once you start that conversation you're on the wrong of sanity and justice. 

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/trump-aide-details-plot-overturn-220744286.html

As Trump Aide Details Plot to Overturn 2020 Election, MSNBC Host Reacts: Failed 'Coup'

 

MSNBC host Ari Melber brought Peter Navarro, former President Donald Trump's senior economic adviser, on his show The Beat on Tuesday to discuss a plan to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election that Navarro describes in his new book, In Trump Time.

After Navarro detailed "Green Bay Sweep," the name of a plot to keep Trump in office despite his electoral defeat to Joe Biden, Melber told his guest that Navarro had just described a "coup."

So what was the Green Bay Sweep?

 

"The plan was simply this: We had over 100 congressman and senators on Capitol Hill to implement the sweep. We were going to challenge the results of the election in the six battleground states," Navarro said. Those included Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

"These were the places where we believe that if the votes were sent back to those battleground states and looked at again, there would be enough concern amongst the legislatures that most or all of those states would decertify the election," he continued.

The intention, then, was that "that would throw the election to the House of Representatives," Navarro said. "And I would say to you here, Ari, that all of this, again, was in the lanes legally. It was prescribed by the Constitution. There is a provision to go, rather than through the Electoral College, to the House of Representatives. And all that's required was peace and calm on Capitol Hill."

Of course, that didn't happen. Instead, Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol in a violent attack, disrupting the certification of the votes before the plan Navarro described could unfold.

"At 1 p.m., Sen. Ted Cruz and [Arizona Rep.] Paul Gosar started the Green Bay Sweep beautifully, challenging the results of Arizona," Navarro told Melber on MSNBC.

The idea was that the members of Congress could continue to disrupt the counting of the electoral votes to cause a historic delay that would get media attention and allow public pressure to build for then-Vice President Mike Pence to send electoral votes back to the six contested states, Navarro previously told The Daily Beast.

Melber pushed back on how Navarro was casting the plan.

"You just described this plan as a way to take an election where the outcome was established by independent secretaries of state, by the voters of those states, and legal remedies had been exhausted with the Supreme Court never even taking, let alone siding with, any of the claims that you just referred to. So legally, they went nowhere," Melber said.

After an interruption from Navarro, Melber continued: "Then you will use the incumbent, losing party's power — that was the Republican party that was losing power — to overtake and reverse that outcome," he said. "Do you realize you are describing a coup?"

 

Love Tucker and Cruz, two scumbags going at it. LOL.

 

17 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

But it will go down as a date in history like Pearl Harbor and 9-11.  

while this may not have been quite on those levels,  this was a major event in this country's history. the sitting potus promoted violence, over a completely BS claim about election fraud, on the capitol and his cuckholds went for it. that's extremely dangerous because now it sets a precedence that this is how you handle things when your side loses an election. 

20 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

But it will go down as a date in history like Pearl Harbor and 9-11.  

"But Pearl Harbor" is the last thing I expected to see in this thread lol.

Just now, Boogyman said:

"But Pearl Harbor" is the last thing I expected to see in this thread lol.

Those are words from Pelosi and Harris being regurgitated back.

1 minute ago, Outlaw said:

Those are words from Pelosi and Harris being regurgitated back.

Yes. Weird take.

Not wrong.

6 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

"But Pearl Harbor" is the last thing I expected to see in this thread lol.

when scumbags like pelosi push such BS, what do you expect ? 

3 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

No doubt.  And the follow up should have been to refuse Trump the ability to run for another elected office. 

But to compare it to Pearl Harbor and 9-11 is ridiculous.  Wouldn't put it past them to push for a bill about some sort of national day of remembrance or "reflection" for 1-6-21.  

I'm sure the BLM/Anitfa folks would have gotten to the WH lawn in the summer of 2020 and just stopped.........reflected and said....." you know...we should go get a latte now and think about this".  

if there wasnt enough security the blm protestors absolutely wouldve breached the white house. 

27 minutes ago, Kz! said:

How is lighting buildings on fire worse than breaking and entering? That's your question?

 

What would you rather have taken away from you, your right to vote, or your right to protest?

Certainly I think we can both agree neither.  But you see, they are two separate things.  Any of this getting through yet?

I'd be happy to discuss the BLM protests just as we have here.  I'm happy to discuss 6-Jan here too.  Just not in the same context.  That's all I got Kz.

12 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said:

Love Tucker and Cruz, two scumbags going at it. LOL.

 

Is there any figure in the history of American politics more pathetic than Cruz?  Call his wife ugly and he’s still subservient. He says something that upsets the right wing media and he immediately starts groveling. And the most amazing thing is that he’s somehow convinced himself that his aspirations of higher office are still intact after tucking his junk back for his entire career. 

1 minute ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

And the cult in here would have celebrated it.  

i'm just happy this theory wasn't tested. 

Just now, DiPros said:

What would you rather have taken away from you, your right to vote, or your right to protest?

Certainly I think we can both agree neither.  But you see, they are two separate things.  Any of this getting through yet?

I'd be happy to discuss the BLM protests just as we have here.  I'm happy to discuss 6-Jan here too.  Just not in the same context.  That's all I got Kz.

No, you're actually starting to sound like toaster, tbh.  

16 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said:

Love Tucker and Cruz, two scumbags going at it. LOL.

 

Fantastic clip, thanks for posting. Tucker proving once again that he's one of the most unbiased journalists out there. Willing to hold one of his guy's feet to the flames over a pathetic comment and not letting him weasel his way out with a non-answer. That's how it's done. GOAT.

5 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

when scumbags like pelosi push such BS, what do you expect ? 

Don't get me wrong. I think every person who entered the property should be charged with as much ish as can be thrown at them. The same for any official whose complicity can be proven. But that comment seems like another in the long line of the Dems sabotaging what they themselves are trying to accomplish. To call it tone deaf would be an understatement.

cruz finally got something right and then curled up like a b*tch. he was spot on with original comment.