Jump to content

Featured Replies

14 minutes ago, mr_hunt said:

they doing an in depth special on hunter's laptop?  

That's on after the 90 minute retrospective about Obamas poor choices in suits over the years.

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Views 123.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

2 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

That's on after the 90 minute retrospective about Obamas poor choices in suits over the years.

sure, go ahead and joke about it, but that tan suit set the country's foreign relations back 100 years. 

17 minutes ago, mr_hunt said:

they doing an in depth special on hunter's laptop?  

I think they should re-explore Stockinggate, when the Biden's didn't put enough Christmas stockings up and America was shaken to it's core.  There's a lot meat still left on that bone.  

On 6/2/2022 at 9:42 AM, mr_hunt said:

rivrg5r007391.jpg?width=960&crop=smart&a

I'm worried that he's not already wondering what's wrong with him.

  • Author
4 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

That's on after the 90 minute retrospective about Obamas poor choices in suits over the years.

Only 90 minutes?

2 minutes ago, GreenReaper said:

I'm worried that he's not already wondering what's wrong with him.

 

28wmke.jpg

2 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

Only 90 minutes?

The prime time slots need to be left open for Hunter Biden and an in depth discussion on the ongoing feminization of M&M's and other chocolates contained within a candy shell.

  • Author
2 minutes ago, Boogyman said:

The prime time slots need to be left open for Hunter Biden and an in depth discussion on the ongoing feminization of M&M's and other chocolates contained within a candy shell.

Clearly there is need for Fox News 2. 

2 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

Clearly there is need for Fox News 2. 

Is there though?

 

Trump allies in Congress refused to participate in the January 6 investigations. Now they're scrambling for a counter-punch plan ahead of the committee's hearing with few details to go by :roll:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-allies-congress-refused-participate-164717754.html

  • The January 6 select committee's first public hearing is Thursday at 8 pm.

  • House GOP leaders declined to take part in the process and are scrambling to play defense.

  • Initial attacks have ranged from critiquing staffing choices to denouncing possible policy changes.

The anticipation about what the January 6 committee plans to show the world during its prime-time public hearing Thursday has lit a fire under House Republicans expected to defend Donald Trump from the year-long investigation they refused to take part in.

The challenge for MAGA-friendly lawmakers like House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy and Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, both of whom have been subpoenaed by the select committee but have declined to discuss what they know about the deadly siege at the US Capitol, is having to coordinate a punch-back-harder strategy designed to appease the embattled former president without fully knowing what the committee has uncovered.
 

It's not yet clear what Trump's allies in and out of Congress will do besides hit conservative media airwaves at the same time the hearings are happening.

Trump spokesman Taylor Budowich declined to lay out specifics about any coordinated counterprogramming but told Insider that GOP leaders are fully on board with defending Trump against any assertions made during the public hearings.

"The entire MAGA movement is united against this illegitimate committee and will work to ensure President Trump is defended against yet another Democrat show trial," Budowich wrote in an email. "Elected leaders and conservative organizations from every corner of our party are working together to ensure every American is informed by the truth, something the Fake News media is unwilling to do."

I mean, it's not a surprise, but you really can't call yourself a news organization and not cover the hearings. I get not putting it on regular Fox, but Fox News? What's next, not covering Biden's next State of the Union speech? Refusing to air the Democratic convention? If this were about Biden and CNN didn't air it, Hannity's head would explode.

This is just pathetic.

5 minutes ago, vikas83 said:

I mean, it's not a surprise, but you really can't call yourself a news organization and not cover the hearings. I get not putting it on regular Fox, but Fox News? What's next, not covering Biden's next State of the Union speech? Refusing to air the Democratic convention? If this were about Biden and CNN didn't air it, Hannity's head would explode.

This is just pathetic.

The GOP plan seems to be working. Describe an alternate reality, and you never need to worry about things like the truth or integrity.

Which are not their strong points, of late.

Washington — A federal judge on Tuesday ordered John Eastman, a conservative lawyer who devised the legal strategy to keep former President Donald Trump in power after he lost the 2020 election, to turn over 159 documents to the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol.

U.S. District Judge David O. Carter, who has been overseeing the records dispute between Eastman and the House panel, said the latest tranche to be disclosed are not covered by attorney-client privilege or protected work product, as the conservative lawyer asserted. The 159 documents were part of a broader batch of nearly 600 documents that Eastman fought to shield from the committee, 440 of which Carter said were privileged and protected from disclosure.

Carter, who sits on the federal district court in Santa Ana, California, gave Eastman until 5 p.m. Wednesday to give the 159 documents to the select committee, ensuring House investigators will have access to the records before their prime-time public hearing Thursday.

Among the documents to be handed over to the select committee are 10 that Carter found are "closely tied" to its investigation. The records, he wrote, relate to three meetings held in the first two weeks of December 2020 by a group of Trump's supporters, which had a "high-profile leader," and included discussions about efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

 

 

:pizza:

14urmvaa19491.jpg?width=960&crop=smart&a

Another reason to dislike Washington. 

2 hours ago, mr_hunt said:

14urmvaa19491.jpg?width=960&crop=smart&a

 

FB_IMG_1654705255231.jpg

10 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:

Another reason to dislike Washington. 

Bet that's gonna go over real well with some of his players.

12 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:

Another reason to dislike Washington. 


I hope the owners let Snyder keep the team forever. Because as an Eagles fan I’ve really enjoyed the last 30 years of pro football in Washington DC.

5 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:


I hope the owners let Snyder keep the team forever. Because as an Eagles fan I’ve really enjoyed the last 30 years of pro football in Washington DC.

Yep, Snyder has screwed that team year in year out.

Fox isn't going to carry the January 6th hearings because they are dedicated to be being fair and balanced, as always.

20 hours ago, DEagle7 said:

Another reason to dislike Washington. 

He apologized

Which of course was followed by.....NEVER APOLOGIZE! :furious:

Just now, Bacarty2 said:

So purely hypothetical...

Let's say it comes out in 2-5-10 years that the votes were stolen? do these people being tried get apologizes?  How many stolen votes is enough to make this right.

Pure hypothetical of course. 

It's not a hypothetical.  They already caught a number of Republicans committing voter fraud.  Thankfully, they're on the road to prison now.  No apology needed.

4 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

So purely hypothetical...

Let's say it comes out in 2-5-10 years that the votes were stolen? do these people being tried get apologizes?  How many stolen votes is enough to make this right.

Pure hypothetical of course. 

I'd say more then half the country thinks this way. Even liberal friends/family are asking why this and not that. 

Look, we understand the pathetic GOP tried to steal the election in many ways. There is ample proof, should you care to look.

There is no evidence the election was stolen. Trump and his supporters TRIED very hard, but failed, because they are Fing idiots.

7 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

So purely hypothetical...

Let's say it comes out in 2-5-10 years that the votes were stolen? do these people being tried get apologizes?  How many stolen votes is enough to make this right.

Pure hypothetical of course. 

 

it's your fan fiction....we're not writing the ending for you. :lol:  

Create an account or sign in to comment