June 21, 20223 yr 5 minutes ago, DiPros said: I hope they sue him for libel #1 rule of law.. regular people can't successfully sue rich people. Lawsuits are almost always lost when one party runs out of money to pay legal bills. Suing people is a costly and painful undertaking.
June 21, 20223 yr Rudy Giuliani admitted 'we just don't have the evidence' of voter fraud, according to testimony https://news.yahoo.com/rudy-giuliani-admitted-just-dont-182356435.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall
June 21, 20223 yr 2 hours ago, Alpha_TATEr said: lots of flat earth type theories. if anyone watches/listens to these hearings and is still willing to support trump, you really don't care about this country, you just have a blind hatred for libs and are willing to throw out any and all principals to go about your crusade against them. That's what they vote for and don't care about it.
June 21, 20223 yr So now Fox News is all concerned about campaign ethics as they worry that Dems will use video of the hearings as campaign ads claiming its a violation. Hypocrites. Fox News host says January 6 committee testimony is not 'not truthful' and could be used in campaign ads Fox News host Martha MacCallum warned the Jan. 6 committee hearings could be used in political ads. Although it's against House ethics rules, she said Democrats might use clips from them in commercials. "Not to say that it's not truthful — but it will be extremely useful in coming campaigns" she said. Fox News host Martha MacCallum speculated that Democrats could use footage from the House Select Committee hearings in the 2022 midterms and the 2024 presidential election. While MacCallum did not dispute the testimony from witnesses who spoke about former President Donald Trump's efforts to subvert the 2020 election, she predicted that the footage will be "turned around" into campaign ads.
June 21, 20223 yr Author 2 hours ago, Ipiggles said: He will suffer the same fate as HIllary for her Russian Collusion hoax to interfere with an election. Neither will ever spend even one day in jail. That you think they're remotely comparable shows how completely partisan and out of touch with reality you are.
June 21, 20223 yr The problem with the January 6 committee for Republicans is that there are only "friendly” Republicans on there. There’s no one like Jim Jordan peppering the witnesses with stupid questions. I honestly think it’s a mistake by the Republicans because it’s allowing the Democrats to craft the entire narrative about January 6 through this committee.
June 21, 20223 yr 13 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: That you think they're remotely comparable shows how completely partisan and out of touch with reality you are. He doesn't "think" anything. He just repeats those Hillary comments over and over in every single thread like the simple little bot he is.
June 21, 20223 yr 10 minutes ago, Dave Moss said: The problem with the January 6 committee for Republicans is that there are only "friendly” Republicans on there. There’s no one like Jim Jordan peppering the witnesses with stupid questions. I honestly think it’s a mistake by the Republicans because it’s allowing the Democrats to craft the entire narrative about January 6 through this committee. You're not interested to know how the witnesses define the word 'woman'?
June 21, 20223 yr 12 minutes ago, Dave Moss said: The problem with the January 6 committee for Republicans is that there are only "friendly” Republicans on there. There’s no one like Jim Jordan peppering the witnesses with stupid questions. I honestly think it’s a mistake by the Republicans because it’s allowing the Democrats to craft the entire narrative about January 6 through this committee. i think the only thing that bothers them (and Trump for that matter) is that the reviews are in, it's a crackling good show and they are missing it.
June 21, 20223 yr 2 hours ago, Dave Moss said: The problem with the January 6 committee for Republicans is that there are only "friendly” Republicans on there. There’s no one like Jim Jordan peppering the witnesses with stupid questions. I honestly think it’s a mistake by the Republicans because it’s allowing the Democrats to craft the entire narrative about January 6 through this committee. Agree. I don't think Gym Jordan would make much headway with these Republican witnesses. Besides, he texted Trump during the insurrection and that's why his participation on the committee was objected to. There is no evidence of fraud. Another problem for them is there are no Republicans standing up for Trump and trying to defend him. The Burden is squarely in Trump's camp to produce actual witnesses who can testify Oh, Bill Barr never said that, I was in the room. Without that, he has literally no defense at all. I highly doubt those witnesses exist. Defending a lie is that much harder. You have to provide proof, which doesn't exist. Let's not forget McCarthy walked away from a Bi-Partisan Commission. So the claim it's one sided or biased doesn't hold any water when he refused to put Republicans on the committee. Big mistake.
June 21, 20223 yr 7 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said: Agree. I don't think Gym Jordan would make much headway with these Republican witnesses. Besides, he texted Trump during the insurrection and that's why his participation on the committee was objected to. There is no evidence of fraud. Another problem for them is there are no Republicans standing up for Trump and trying to defend him. The Burden is squarely in Trump's camp to produce actual witnesses who can testify Oh, Bill Barr never said that, I was in the room. Without that, he has literally no defense at all. I highly doubt those witnesses exist. Defending a lie is that much harder. You have to provide proof, which doesn't exist. Let's not forget McCarthy walked away from a Bi-Partisan Commission. So the claim it's one sided or biased doesn't hold any water when he refused to put Republicans on the committee. Big mistake. Yeah, maybe someone less culpable for 1/6 than Gym Jordan, but someone who could have defended Trump. Under the current format it’s just Trump getting decimated in every hearing.
June 21, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, Dave Moss said: Yeah, maybe someone less culpable for 1/6 than Gym Jordan, but someone who could have defended Trump. Under the current format it’s just Trump getting decimated in every hearing. He deserves it. Trump continues everyday to say there was fraud and continue the Big Lie. This is a clear response to what he does every day. McCarthy really failed Trump by not putting other Republicans on it. He thought they could attack the committee as being biased which has failed.
June 22, 20223 yr 12 hours ago, Dave Moss said: Yeah, maybe someone less culpable for 1/6 than Gym Jordan, but someone who could have defended Trump. Under the current format it’s just Trump getting decimated in every hearing. decimated by his own though. these people supported and voted for him, but found out real quickly how trump will turn on you and toss you to the wolves if you deny him. so far the only election fraud being proven is the fake electoral scheme. now before you say it, i know, i know, the trumpcucks have ton of .....
June 22, 20223 yr 6 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said: decimated by his own though. these people supported and voted for him, but found out real quickly how trump will turn on you and toss you to the wolves if you deny him. so far the only election fraud being proven is the fake electoral scheme. now before you say it, i know, i know, the trumpcucks have ton of ..... I can't understand why the republicans, any republicans would even want him back.
June 22, 20223 yr 2 minutes ago, Gannan said: I can't understand why the republicans, any republicans would even want him back. yeah, but biden's son owned a laptop. that fact can not be stated enough.
Create an account or sign in to comment