Jump to content

Featured Replies

8 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

It’s already started.  There’s a pedestrian bridge over the highway on my way home from work and I looked up last night and saw someone holding a sign that said "Stay in your lane, SCOTUS”  I chuckled

 

Ironic because "in their lane" was exactly where they were.

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Views 123.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

11 minutes ago, lynched1 said:

Ironic because "in their lane" was exactly where they were.

Abortion has been the #1 women’s rights issue of the last 100 years.  And regardless of how you feel about the topic it looks like that’s going to continue.

An amendment has no shot because they would never get to 38 states not to mention the votes in Congress.  That’s really the only "easy” way Congress could protect it as a right after yesterday.  So buckle up because we’re in for a long fight.

On 6/25/2022 at 5:24 PM, Dave Moss said:

Abortion has been the #1 women’s rights issue of the last 100 years.  And regardless of how you feel about the topic it looks like that’s going to continue.

Things may be changing Dave now that we have lots of men who can get pregnant and lots of women who can’t. 

20 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

Abortion has been the #1 women’s rights issue of the last 100 years.  And regardless of how you feel about the topic it looks like that’s going to continue.

Here's the thing. I don't have any strong feeling about the subject one way or another.

On the other hand. When previously before the court even liberal justices knew there would be issues with their rulings and the arguments made. Despite the multiple opportunities over the last 50 years there has been no attempt at codifying law in Congress.

Why? The laziness and lack of education on the subject amongst the populous. Among the political, the threat of appeal was a money maker and useful tool in elections. 

4 minutes ago, lynched1 said:

Here's the thing. I don't have any strong feeling about the subject one way or another.

On the other hand. When previously before the court even liberal justices knew there would be issues with their rulings and the arguments made. Despite the multiple opportunities over the last 50 years there has been no attempt at codifying law in Congress.

Why? The laziness and lack of education on the subject amongst the populous. Among the political, the threat of appeal was a money maker and useful tool in elections. 

The conservative movement has used the Roe versus Wade decision as a reason to vote for Republicans for the past 50 years. Now it’s gonna swing back the other way.  You’ll have PACs dedicated just to abortion rights.  I don’t see much reason for pro-life PACs at this point.

Phyllis Schlafly finally succeeded (just not in her lifetime)

27 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

Things may changing Dave now that we have lots of men who can get pregnant and lots of women who can’t. 

My wife and daughter informed me that I’m going to a protest tonight. I’ll report back about how many pregnant men were there.

2 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

My wife and daughter informed me that I’m going to a protest tonight. I’ll report back about how many pregnant men were there.

Stay safe. Wear a pink hat.

11 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

The conservative movement has used the Roe versus Wade decision as a reason to vote for Republicans for the past 50 years. Now it’s gonna swing back the other way.  You’ll have PACs dedicated just to abortion rights.  I don’t see much reason for pro-life PACs at this point.

Phyllis Schlafly finally succeeded (just not in her lifetime)

Yeah. The Democrats weren't mining their people at all......

Wake up

6 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

My wife and daughter informed me that I’m going to a protest tonight. I’ll report back about how many pregnant men were there.

It's sexist of you not to include pregnant woman and "birthing people".

7 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

Stay safe. Wear a pink hat.


I don’t think the plan is to storm any buildings but we’ll see.

1 minute ago, Dave Moss said:


I don’t think the plan is to storm any buildings but we’ll see.

Don't do it Dave! Last thing television programming needs is the Jun 25 show.

48 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:


I don’t think the plan is to storm any buildings but we’ll see.

On campus or downtown?

1 hour ago, DrPhilly said:

On campus or downtown?

Downtown.  There’s no one on campus except for a handful of students (either athletes or folks taking summer classes I guess).  Oh, and construction workers.  There’s construction workers everywhere.  Lol

2 hours ago, Dave Moss said:


I don’t think the plan is to storm any buildings but we’ll see.

al9cdQK.gif

just announced...hearing tomorrow at 1pm. :pizza:

  • Author
On 6/25/2022 at 2:48 PM, DEagle7 said:

al9cdQK.gif

I would disappoint the hell out of her. 

  • Author

 

 

If this unscheduled hearing is for the video footage of Trump during the insurrection 

:pizza:

vid of cheeto polishing his tiny 🍄 while his cult screams hang mike pence.

Trump is a stable genius, tough, and is also a good Christian.

5 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

Trump is a stable genius, tough, and is also a good Christian.

the country was also doing a lot better under Trump than the current bozo occupying the WH

1 minute ago, Procus said:

the country was also doing a lot better under Trump than the current bozo occupying the WH

Stop staring at the eclipse, it isn't good for you.

9 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

Stop staring at the eclipse, it isn't good for you.

which means you know what I wrote is 100% correct, and you don't have any intelligent response, so you write something stupid and off the wall instead :roll:

This special hearing must be Schiff’s big reveal. 

Create an account or sign in to comment