2 minutes ago, Kz! said:

So, these people could have kept their mouths shut and literally nothing would have happened to them... but your theory is that they're lying, for no apparent reason

  This is exactly what you're alleging this woman did.  And she was a Trump loyalist who was working her way up in Republican politics.

Make it make sense.

1 hour ago, mr_hunt said:

his dope cult followers are beyond repair. 

trump knowing that his rioters were heavily armed & screaming for them to get rid of the metal detectors & allow them in anyway...because they weren't there for him....was big. it shows his state of mind and intent. the witness tampering/intimidation statements at the end were also yuuuge. 

the colorful stories about the secret service & the big baby flinging ketchup at the wall were things that were told to hutchinson & are great internet fodder...but mostly irrelevant to locking cheeto's a** up, imo.  

don't let them try to distract with all the secret service "he said" (not under oath)/"she said" (under oath) nonsense. that story wasn't even close to the most damning part of yesterday's testimony. 

 

2 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Kz dodged my question about the bamboo fibers but maybe you have the answer. How did Soros do it again right under everyone's nose? He's like the best puppet master of all-time, right?

You have to ask KZ, I dont care about Soros or his money, but sounds like maybe you do? 

1 minute ago, VanHammersly said:

  This is exactly what you're alleging this woman did.  And she was a Trump loyalist who was working her way up in Republican politics.

Make it make sense.

Except she's saying she heard it from her cousin's friend's wife. These two, with direct knowledge of what happened, are saying it didn't happen and they'll testify it didn't. Holy ish, did that really need to be explained to blue anon?  

Just now, Ipiggles said:

You have to ask KZ, I dont care about Soros or his money, but sounds like maybe you do? 

I'm just trying to understand how the 3am ballot dump was executed so flawlessly. I mean, the stakes were pretty high given it was the election of the leader of the free world, but somehow only Kz has the answers? That's a shame.

1 minute ago, Kz! said:

So, these people could have kept their mouths shut and literally nothing would have happened to them... but your theory is that they're lying, for no apparent reason, to help Trump. The man who allegedly assaulted them. I mean, it's a bold strategy, you're probably right.   

first of all, i haven't heard a single word from these people as far as i know. we've got a tweet from Peter Alexander and @Breaking911?

45 minutes ago, Kz! said:

So, basically, unless the event was actually caught on camera, everything that the show trial has brought forth is questionable at this point. Unfortunate, but I guess that's the risk you run when you bring out a "star surprise" witness that gets debunked literally hours after testifying. I mean, it would have been so easy to corroborate that story, but they just didn't. Holy ish, it's too funny.  

Cope and seethe loser.

3 minutes ago, mr_hunt said:

don't let them try to distract with all the secret service "he said" (not under oath)/"she said" (under oath) nonsense. that story wasn't even close to the most damning part of yesterday's testimony. 

hunt's so triggered he's literally coping by replying to himself. These are the best days in CVON.  

2 minutes ago, mr_hunt said:

don't let them try to distract with all the secret service "he said" (not under oath)/"she said" (under oath) nonsense. that story wasn't even close to the most damning part of yesterday's testimony. 

AT this point all of her testimony is questionable at best unless corraborated. 

Can we talk more about the ketchup on the wall though?

Just now, we_gotta_believe said:

I'm just trying to understand how the 3am ballot dump was executed so flawlessly. I mean, the stakes were pretty high given it was the election of the leader of the free world, but somehow only Kz has the answers? That's a shame.

Again- go ask KZ.

You keep casting the line, but I aint biting.  

 

I am trying to understand how you rubes keep falling for the same Dem Schtick over and over again? 

Just now, JohnSnowsHair said:

Cope and seethe loser.

Riot Kitchen coming in hot! Skipping right over the coping step and going straight to seething. 

1 minute ago, Kz! said:

hunt's so triggered he's literally coping by replying to himself. These are the best days in CVON.  

Just now, Ipiggles said:

AT this point all of her testimony is questionable at best unless corraborated. 

Right.   I'm sure you'll believe it then.  

I love it how you guys are pretending to be seriously concerned about testimony from the Jan 6th committee after either ignoring it or pretending like no one cared for the last few weeks.

1 minute ago, Ipiggles said:

Again- go ask KZ.

You keep casting the line, but I aint biting.  

 

I am trying to understand how you rubes keep falling for the same Dem Schtick over and over again? 

So you don't think Trump was robbed of the election?

Just now, VanHammersly said:

Right.   I'm sure you'll believe it then.  

I love it how you guys are pretending to be seriously concerned about testimony from the Jan 6th committee after either ignoring it or pretending like no one cared for the last few weeks.

Yeah, when the show trial gets debunked real-time it's so weird that people want to point and laugh. We're reaching levels of cope previously thought impossible in here.  

Just now, VanHammersly said:

Right.   I'm sure you'll believe it then.  

I love it how you guys are pretending to be seriously concerned about testimony from the Jan 6th committee after either ignoring it or pretending like no one cared for the last few weeks.

It's all in the playbook:

1. They're lying.
2. OK so maybe some of it's true but Dems are worse.
3. Maybe it's all true. Who cares? None of it matters.

Just now, mayanh8 said:

It's all in the playbook:

1. They're lying.
2. OK so maybe some of it's true but Dems are worse.
3. Maybe it's all true. Who cares? None of it matters.

I thought this is where they were all along.

1 minute ago, Kz! said:

Yeah, when the show trial gets debunked real-time it's so weird that people want to point and laugh. We're reaching levels of cope previously thought impossible in here.  

The left can't even win a hand playing with a deck they stacked themselves  That's how retarded they are

1 minute ago, Kz! said:

Yeah, when the show trial gets debunked real-time it's so weird that people want to point and laugh. We're reaching levels of cope previously thought impossible in here.  

  You really don't understand what that word means.  No one's testified under oath to the contrary.

Quote

Hutchinson claims she overheard Trump say about the crowd, "You know, I don’t effing care that they have weapons. They’re not here to hurt me. Take the effing mags away. Let my people in. They can march to the Capitol from here. Let the people in. Take the effing mags away.”

As Jake Tapper noted, the "mags” refer to magnetometers deployed to keep armed individuals away from the president. 

Trump has denied Hutchinson’s testimony in a series of "truths” (equivalent to a tweet) on his website, Truth Social. Moreover, it is important to attempt to corroborate Hutchinson’s sworn testimony by interviewing others who may have heard Trump’s words. But Hutchinson’s sworn testimony closes a gap in the criminal case against Trump, and Trump is closer to a credible prosecution than ever before.

1 minute ago, mayanh8 said:

It's all in the playbook:

1. They're lying.
2. OK so maybe some of it's true but Dems are worse.
3. Maybe it's all true. Who cares? None of it matters.

To more accurately describe what happened in this instance, the playbook is.

1. They're lying.

2. They're clearly lying.

3. Holy ish they literally just got caught lying in real time lmao

54 minutes ago, Kz! said:

So, basically, unless the event was actually caught on camera, everything that the show trial has brought forth is questionable at this point. Unfortunate, but I guess that's the risk you run when you bring out a "star surprise" witness that gets debunked literally hours after testifying. I mean, it would have been so easy to corroborate that story, but they just didn't. Holy ish, it's too funny.  

Everything that we already knew would be more than enough for any reasonable person. It was all done in front of the cameras

• Trump has said any election he doesn't win is illegitimate.  He still claims Ted Cruz rigged the Iowa caucuses.
• He knew he lost and declared victory anyway.
• He knew he was going to be forcibly removed from office and encouraged his supporters to employ violence so he could remain in power.
• His supporters in turn became violent, killed  a cop and tried to kill Pence.
• Trump's response was "We love you. You are very special"

Honestly if half the country weren't right wing loons with an IQ of around plant life he would have been barred from holding office ever again when he was impeached the second time and none of this would even be necessary. 

What Trump did shouldn't even be a matter of debate, and it for damn sure doesn't matter if he tried to grab a steering wheel. This country is hopelessly stupid. 

1 minute ago, VanHammersly said:

  You really don't understand what that word means.  No one's testified under oath to the contrary.

 Blue anon is a cult and this is the content I'm here for.