1 hour ago, Ipiggles said:

I am. Her testimony now needs to be corroborated, otherwise it's all questionable. You dont get to perjure yourself and have the rest of your testimony stand, unless corroborated.  To me her testimony is the most daming evidence heard from the Hearings. If True, it would end anything Trump wise going fwd. 

You are going off of a tweet that some dude sent.  Relax.  You have no reason extra reason to question her testimony at this stage.

9 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

You are going off of a tweet that some dude sent.  Relax.  You have no reason extra reason to question her testimony at this stage.

Sources say…

6 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

Sources say…

Sources say there was a balding hippie Brooklyn Nets fan at the pro choice rally in Winston Salem last week as well

5 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

Sources say there was a balding hippie Brooklyn Nets fan at the pro choice rally in Winston Salem last week as well

Yeah, that’s wrong

1 minute ago, Dave Moss said:

Yeah, that’s wrong

Really?  I think we have visual evidence of the event.

23 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

You are going off of a tweet that some dude sent.  Relax.  You have no reason extra reason to question her testimony at this stage.

 We have time. 

1 hour ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Literally nobody believes you're ever gonna jump off the MAGA Trump train. Not sure why you feel so compelled to keep up the charade. At least KKKz can own his mental illness rather than deny it.

Right. No one is allowed any independence of thought here. You can subscribe ONLY to extreme hatred of Trump OR profound love.  Gray areas will not be acknowledged and a desire to better understand the facts before taking a position will not be tolerated.  Thank you for once again reminding everyone that only well traveled partisan narratives are allowed.  

Just now, Ipiggles said:

 We have time. 

That is already 100% better

Just now, The Norseman said:

Right. No one is allowed any independence of thought here. You can subscribe ONLY to extreme hatred of Trump OR profound love.  Gray areas will not be acknowledged and a desire to better understand the facts before taking a position will not be tolerated.  Thank you for once again reminding everyone that only well traveled partisan narratives are allowed.  

If you've read all his posts and still think ipiggles isn't a dyed in the wool trumpbot, then you're even dumber than he is.

11 minutes ago, DrPhilly said:

Really?  I think we have visual evidence of the event.

That was a Sixers fan wearing Nets gear.

Some things I want to see in this next hearing:

• The Big Onion, Ornato, and Engel all testifying under oath without them taking the fifth or giving us the Reagan Special ("not to my recollection")
• Cheney calling out Ginni for being a scared little beech and now refusing to testify
• Sources for the following quotes and who was attempting to influence testimony prior to the deposition or hearing

Just now, Dave Moss said:

That was a Sixers fan wearing Nets gear.

No Sixers fan would ever do that

1 minute ago, we_gotta_believe said:

If you've read all his posts and still think ipiggles isn't a dyed in the wool trumpbot, then you're even dumber than he is.

Yes, yes, we know.  You've branded everyone in here and told us exactly how we should think about them.  What an enormous value add you are. 

27 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

Sources say…

I hear sources say they spotted Fitz at PHL this am.

Just now, The Norseman said:

Yes, yes, we know.  You've branded everyone in here and told us exactly how we should think about them.  What an enormous value add you are. 

You're welcome, bud. Glad to help in anyway I can.

17 minutes ago, The Norseman said:

Right. No one is allowed any independence of thought here. You can subscribe ONLY to extreme hatred of Trump OR profound love.  Gray areas will not be acknowledged and a desire to better understand the facts before taking a position will not be tolerated.  Thank you for once again reminding everyone that only well traveled partisan narratives are allowed.  

The guy already said multiple times he would vote for any republican that runs. He voluntarily confirmed his bot status weeks ago.

24 minutes ago, The Norseman said:

Right. No one is allowed any independence of thought here. You can subscribe ONLY to extreme hatred of Trump OR profound love.  Gray areas will not be acknowledged and a desire to better understand the facts before taking a position will not be tolerated.  Thank you for once again reminding everyone that only well traveled partisan narratives are allowed.  

Actually, there's a lot of independent thought that is completely separate from Trump.  Libertarians, moderate Republicans, moderate Dems and liberals all have pretty divergent points of view about most issues, we just all agree that anyone who wants to dismantle democracy is a traitor that shouldn't hold public office.  It's the people that believe their cult leader should've ruled despite losing an election that are all in lock-step.

I didn't see the testimony yesterday, and I understand most of this thread is simply a forum for ridiculous screaming by idiots. But let's just be clear on the whole story about the limo. Hutchinson doesn't claim to have witnessed it -- she claims that she was told the story by Tony Ornato. So, the Secret Service and/or Ornato testifying that it didn't happen doesn't make her guilty of perjury. Ornato would need to testify under oath that he never told Hutchinson those things. He'd have to provide his accounting of that conversation (if it happened) in order to make her a liar. 

If he lied/embellished when telling her the story, then she didn't perjure himself even if it didn't happen. 

Now, go back to screaming about things for no reason.

EDIT: And if he does say under oath that he didn't say those things to her, then we have a he said/she said situation. So you'd look for corroborating evidence for either side -- are there any contemporaneous notes? Were they both in the same location at the time of the alleged conversation? Did either party recount the details of the conversation to another person? etc.

*wheezing laughter*

2 minutes ago, Kz! said:

*wheezing laughter*

Last place in reality, first place in retarded CVON ishlibs' hearts 

7 minutes ago, vikas83 said:

I didn't see the testimony yesterday, and I understand most of this thread is simply a forum for ridiculous screaming by idiots. But let's just be clear on the whole story about the limo. Hutchinson doesn't claim to have witnessed it -- she claims that she was told the story by Tony Ornato. So, the Secret Service and/or Ornato testifying that it didn't happen doesn't make her guilty of perjury. Ornato would need to testify under oath that he never told Hutchinson those things. He'd have to provide his accounting of that conversation (if it happened) in order to make her a liar. 

If he lied/embellished when telling her the story, then she didn't perjure himself even if it didn't happen. 

Now, go back to screaming about things for no reason.

How do you feel about the show trial folks not verifying the story before going full libtard and putting it on their made-for-tv special?

Just now, Kz! said:

How do you feel about the show trial folks not verifying the story before going full libtard and putting it on their made-for-tv special?

Yeah. I'm gonna respond to a moron about a hearing I didn't watch. 

Makes sense.

Just now, vikas83 said:

Yeah. I'm gonna respond to a moron about a hearing I didn't watch. 

Makes sense.

You didn't watch it?  I GUESS YOU HATE DEMOCRACY, TERRORIST

6 minutes ago, mikemack8 said:

You didn't watch it?  I GUESS YOU HATE DEMOCRACY, TERRORIST

Vikas mentions morons not watching the hearing, and you came a'runnin'.

 

Cool.

10 minutes ago, vikas83 said:

Yeah. I'm gonna respond to a moron about a hearing I didn't watch. 

Makes sense.

Nope, you're going to run like the 5'2" **** that you are.