July 1, 20223 yr 36 minutes ago, Dave Moss said: Kz’ sources have been debunked! even jack probiotic?
July 1, 20223 yr How many times does MAGA boi Twitter need to kick @Kz! in the balls before he decides not to play their game of "I'm going to kick @Kz! in the balls again because he's too stupid to know I'm going to do it again".
July 1, 20223 yr One source said they heard, Again hearsay, but let’s run with that. Bring these sources into congress under oath and how about some cross examination by parties involved. It’s starting to put a biased view on the part of the committee. Think they goofed up on this one.
July 1, 20223 yr 13 minutes ago, Procus said: Let's see. You had the GOP who flat out rejected the idea of an investigation in the first place. And then you had the loudest, Trumpiest members who wanted to (pretend to) participate—and it turns out they all secretly begged Trump for pardons. You know...for the crimes they "didn't" commit. So basically, any semi-legit GOP avoided this investigation so they could eventually complain to you mouth breathers about how there are no GOP in the investigation. And here you are, eating it up. Just like they knew you would.
July 1, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, Talkingbirds said: One source said they heard, Again hearsay, but let’s run with that. Bring these sources into congress under oath and how about some cross examination by parties involved. It’s starting to put a biased view on the part of the committee. Think they goofed up on this one. Once again, it's a Congressional hearing, not a court of law. Pretty standard stuff if you've ever paid attention to how these work. The witnesses are free to provide any testimony they wish. Who would you even have in mind to "cross examine" someone like Hutchinson?
July 1, 20223 yr 39 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Once again, it's a Congressional hearing, not a court of law. Pretty standard stuff if you've ever paid attention to how these work. The witnesses are free to provide any testimony they wish. Who would you even have in mind to "cross examine" someone like Hutchinson? Didn't McCarthy want to put forward Jim Jordan? I'm sure he would have added some much needed insight and maturity here.
July 1, 20223 yr 2 minutes ago, DEagle7 said: Didn't McCarthy want to put forward Jim Jordan? I'm sure he would have added some much needed insight and maturity here. It also would have been great once we got to the point where it was revealed that Jordan requested a pardon...for the crime that he'd be leading an investigation of.
July 1, 20223 yr 1 hour ago, we_gotta_believe said: Who would you even have in mind to "cross examine" someone like Hutchinson? Guess someone from the DOJ would be out of the equation. I guess the best would be to bring in those who are refuting her testimony and give them equal time ?
July 2, 20223 yr 2 hours ago, Talkingbirds said: Guess someone from the DOJ would be out of the equation. I guess the best would be to bring in those who are refuting her testimony and give them equal time ? I would love to see that. Hopefully they have a spine and don't get cold feet like Ginni did.
July 2, 20223 yr I would like Mark Meadows to testify since Hutchinson made him look like the worst Chief of Staff in history. Unfortunately he’s claiming executive privilege to try to avoid doing so.
July 2, 20223 yr 14 hours ago, Procus said: Sure, and if the GOP made a committee to investigate Hunter Biden, they would have let Joe Biden on the committee, right? Sure they would.
July 3, 20223 yr The "get Trump" committee really isn't happy with the secret service blowing up their rushed for TV special witness.
July 3, 20223 yr Author 10 hours ago, lynched1 said: The "get Trump" committee really isn't happy with the secret service blowing up their rushed for TV special witness. Uh, except others in the secret service also corroborating. Let them testify under oath like Hutchinson.
Create an account or sign in to comment