It keeps getting better!!!

 

 

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

It keeps getting better!!!

 

 

"...failure to appear" ???

 

Then why hasn't JJAW been suspended?     

3 minutes ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

"...failure to appear" ???

 

Then why hasn't JJAW been suspended for life from the NFL?     

FYP

1 hour ago, Mike030270 said:

Is Gannon going to rotate the Dline?

With Barnett, Sweat, Kerrigan and Graham he should. I think Kerrigan still has some gas in the tank. 

5 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

It keeps getting better!!!

 

 

Can these guys not set a single phone reminder?

Only a matter of time before Smith hurts his back, too.

1 minute ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

You really think he accidentally forgot and missed it?  Come on.  

Yeah really, you miss those for one reason only. To give yourself more time to get a clean piss test. That fact that he missed it could mean what he was using would have put him out longer, I don't see any other reason why you take that risk. 

16 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

I guess we can start prepping the excuses for next year already. "Gallup/Zack Martin/La'el Collins was out" etc etc 

1 minute ago, Bwestbrook36 said:

Yeah really, you miss those for one reason only. To give yourself more time to get a clean piss test. That fact that he missed it could mean what he was using would have put him out longer, I don't see any other reason why you take that risk. 

 

Of all the teams in the league, I'd bet the Cowboys are the most likely to stock the locker room fridge with cranberry juice.

3 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

You really think he accidentally forgot and missed it?  Come on.  

Lol, good point.

DAL has a legitimate shot at starting 0-3.

14 minutes ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

"...failure to appear" ???

 

Then why hasn't JJAW been suspended?     

JJAW not performing was the previous QB's fault   

Breakout season coming .... 

33 minutes ago, Ipiggles said:

WK 1 Brian Finneran droped a pass that was then intercepted, and was cut that week, Falcons picked him up and he became a good WR for them. While we struggled with less thans

THAT's what it was.  I knew Finneran was involved in week 1 somehow.  Probably combined that with Jurevicious vs Barry Gardner/Damon Moore in the last game at the Vet. 

Or was that Levon Kirkland in that game?

1 minute ago, D-Shiznit said:

DAL has a legitimate shot at starting 0-3.

7 minutes ago, Bwestbrook36 said:

Yeah really, you miss those for one reason only. To give yourself more time to get a clean piss test. That fact that he missed it could mean what he was using would have put him out longer, I don't see any other reason why you take that risk. 

Its the same punishment

1 minute ago, bpac55 said:

THAT's what it was.  I knew Finneran was involved in week 1 somehow.  Probably combined that with 

Please don’t type out that last part. It’s still painful

Just now, TorontoEagle said:

Please don’t type out that last part. It’s still painful

Quite possibly the worst modern Eagles memory for me and many of us.  

Randall going down against the Packers was bad but I was still a kid so it didn't really resonate how important that was.  Losing to the Bucs...ugh.

5 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Its the same punishment

I can pretend it isn't. 

There's also some precedence with Bell appealing his suspension from missing 3 drug tests, going from 4 games to 3. It will be interesting to see what happens. 

 

1 minute ago, Bwestbrook36 said:

I can pretend it isn't. 

They changed the rules around so maybe i'm wrong. Since they classified it as under the substance abuse policy, i'm assuming it was a simple piss test and the punishment for testing dirty is the same as missing the test. The PED policy is a blood test I believe which has harsher punishments. 

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

They changed the rules around so maybe i'm wrong. Since they classified it as under the substance abuse policy, i'm assuming it was a simple piss test and the punishment for testing dirty is the same as missing the test. The PED policy is a blood test I believe which has harsher punishments. 

Oh ok, I wasn't sure since they changed some rules on stuff like weed. I also thought it would depend on what you were caught for before.

So if he was on the drug protocol for steroids but, then tested positive for weed they would let him go is what I was thinking.

So breaking those rules more then once it doesn't matter what it is for then? 

5 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

Dillard for Lamb straight up!  Wait, Dillard can't play RT. Now it will never happen. 

10 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

Welcome to an hour ago

12 minutes ago, Bwestbrook36 said:

Oh ok, I wasn't sure since they changed some rules on stuff like weed. I also thought it would depend on what you were caught for before.

So if he was on the drug protocol for steroids but, then tested positive for weed they would let him go is what I was thinking.

So breaking those rules more then once it doesn't matter what it is for then? 

I just know it used to be two different policies. PED policy was different punishments for something like steroids showing up vs a masking agent showing up. The more times you fail for the same thing the harsher the punishment. But it didn't matter if you were strike 1 or 2 on substance abuse and vice versa. 

Then there's substance abuse policy, which I don't think gets punished at all anymore unless maybe it's something hardcore. Marijuana isn't punished anymore. So I don't really understand why he would miss a substance abuse test, unless they just combined the policies or something.