1 minute ago, Waiting4Someday said:

If we want a good price, it will likely be from a team that is competing - so who’s going give up a valuable player given that criteria… Al Harris 3 corner situation?

Could also be a team with a young QB to protect like Joe Burrow

35 minutes ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

Lane and Mailata have already missed time this season. He’s going to start again before the season is over. 
 

It’s nice having a good backup LT to protect our franchise QB….

He’s going to start more often than not between now and the end of the season.

2 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

He’s going to start more often than not between now and the end of the season.

If Dillard gets traded, and one of Lane/Mailata goes down, our backup OT is Toth. 

Honest question, has Dillard been better at LT than Driscoll was at RT?

1 minute ago, Saltpeter said:

Honest question, has Dillard been better at LT than Driscoll was at RT?

Honest question… was Mailata better than Dillard in his starts at LT? Seriously asking because I’m not sure. 

3 minutes ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

Honest question… was Mailata better than Dillard in his starts at LT? Seriously asking because I’m not sure. 

With balanced playcalling, yes.

21 minutes ago, RLC said:

If Dillard gets traded, and one of Lane/Mailata goes down, our backup OT is Toth. 

I think it likely would be Driscoll. and they have Clark on the PS

53 minutes ago, Original Sin said:

Yea , ok  sport  .

judging from your generic QB takes , you’re the one who would be better served watching more football .

that being said , I won’t go back and forth with you , it’s like talking football with a teenager .

This teenager here played 4 years div 1 as a starting FS, then 1 preseason/camp in the NFL...till I was cut in the early 2000's,  lol. So I have a slight idea of what Im watching. But I didnt make it past preseason so maybe I dont, lol  :) 

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

I think it likely would be Driscoll 

True. I thought about this. I dislike the idea of getting worse at 2 spots (OT, RG) with one move. Not like Herbig is a world-beater.

Supposedly there’s going to be a massive storm in San Fran tonight during the game. Rain and high winds. Colts and 49ers likely will go run heavy if so which will lower the snap counts. 

1 minute ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Supposedly there’s going to be a massive storm in San Fran tonight during the game. Rain and high winds. Colts and 49ers likely will go run heavy if so which will lower the snap counts. 

More runs = less opportunities to get hurt!

15 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Supposedly there’s going to be a massive storm in San Fran tonight during the game. Rain and high winds. Colts and 49ers likely will go run heavy if so which will lower the snap counts. 

Less likely to get hurt with limited snaps and a run heavy scheme, at least that’s my hope. 

 

If I was to pick a upset today , I would take Bengals over Ravens .

1 minute ago, ManuManu said:

Less likely to get hurt with limited snaps and a run heavy scheme, at least that’s my hope. 

 

Sounds right, he hasn’t been charged, he should be able to play, and if he never gets criminally charged, should he be suspended anyway?   I guess depending on the settlements. 

 

2 minutes ago, The Blackfish said:

Sounds right, he hasn’t been charged, he should be able to play, and if he never gets criminally charged, should he be suspended anyway?   I guess depending on the settlements. 

He's in the middle of a grand jury investigation. He's been credibly accused by multiple women of wrongdoing. Even if he survives the legal process, that doesn't make him innocent. The NFL also has an obligation to the people that work within the organization. 

20 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

Less likely to get hurt with limited snaps and a run heavy scheme, at least that’s my hope. 

 

And this is why i said the other day it’s not a given the nfl just goes ahead and suspends him if he traded. 

Aghlor with TD

15 minutes ago, The Blackfish said:

Sounds right, he hasn’t been charged, he should be able to play, and if he never gets criminally charged, should he be suspended anyway?   I guess depending on the settlements. 

He’s likely getting suspended no matter what happens. Elliott was suspended and had no charges, and nothing really public about it. 

First two passing TD’s today were by non QBs

1 minute ago, LeanMeanGM said:

He’s likely getting suspended no matter what happens. Elliott was suspended and had no charges, and nothing really public about it. 

Yeah but the nfl is the type of league that’ll suspended him but would allow him to play this year and then hit the dolphins with the suspension next year when the investigation/settlement/trial is over. 

Mahomes with the fumble 

KC just is not the same team 

Tua looks good for Miami, but that offense is slow/painful to watch. 

7 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Yeah but the nfl is the type of league that’ll suspended him but would allow him to play this year and then hit the dolphins with the suspension next year when the investigation/settlement/trial is over. 

Probably unless he’s indicted 

I never understood where the narrative came from about Watson all of a sudden becoming suspended if he was active. NFL has never done it in the past and there was no indication they were even going to suspend him now.

Hasn’t been charged nor is there any video of him that’s been made public. 
 

Just a bunch of people repeating others who have no insight.