Hell ya Dick Rod!

We have two open main roster spots now.

 

1 minute ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Ugh

Not the rodgers we wanted but the rodgers we deserve. 

1 minute ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 

Cool. I was going to say i know there was one later in the game cause the niners fan at the bar and I both looked at each other and were like that should’ve been picked 

If i wasn't at work I'd link a video...but government computers

2 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Ugh

I like Anderson. Solid depth move. Think he will do well under Stout.

That said, Dickerson needs to start at guard. Herbig is suitable depth, but let's keep it that way.

32 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

lol as much torture as thinking 3:1 td to int (Jackson) or 4:1 td to int ratio (rivers) is considered the normal average for an nfl starting QB. I’d consider bridgewater the definition of average QB. How many times has he had a 3:1 season where he’s thrown for 25+ tds? Yeah he’s never done that. Also taysom hill started 8 games. Is he in the 32  that’s 1/2 of a season as a starter? And if he is then he and brees are both in the top 32 meaning another starter from another team you just eliminated which seems wrong of you to do so. So really just saying well there’s 32 teams so 32 starters is a flawed way. So once Again you continuously leave out variables  

 coming from the guy who told me he talked about totality but meanwhile completely dismisses the first 2.5 quarters of kaepernick’s performances and solely focuses on the last 1.5 quarters to justify he played well ALL 60 mins. Im sorry when a QB doesn’t play well for at least half of the game, i don’t think it’s a stretch to say he didn’t play well enough to justify he had a good performance or a winning performance   

Again if you think Colin Kaepernick played well in the first 2.5 quarters of the Super Bowl then we are done.

Actually you can respond I’m moving on cause your hypothetical is basically what russell Wilson did last year with rodgers and allen being more consistent all year and getting more votes then him. 

Not nearly as flawed as thinking the median QB performance should be judged from a superset of 50+ players. Or that 16 ints is average when not a single QB threw that many last season.

6 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Ugh

Ertz is on the Covid list.  This would indicate that Rodgers will be activated on gameday to me.

Just now, Iggles_Phan said:

Ertz is on the Covid list.  This would indicate that Rodgers will be activated on gameday to me.

Same, if Ertz isn't cleared. I still think they would be fine if they just went with Goedert for one game with Stoll backing him up. 

5 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Not nearly as flawed as thinking the mean or median QB performance should be judged from a superset of 50+ players.

Yeah i just gave you an example of how Tysom hill started 8 games and brees started 8. So were both in your top 32? Cause if so you knocked out another starter from your top 32. Or did they not start enough games so there isn’t 32 now and you should go to 15th overall QB as average. Oh i should also do that with the Broncos as that happened with lock. I also probably should do that with the eagles as wentz started 12 and hurts 4. Yup no flawed logic in just choosing top 32 qbs… 

10 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Ugh

Behold... DickRod's turgid prowess is upon us.

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

Same, if Ertz isn't cleared. I still think they would be fine if they just went with Goedert for one game with Stoll backing him up. 

Stoll has been getting a decent number of snaps already.  Seems they like having 3 TEs.

Just now, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Yeah i just gave you an example of how Tyson hill started 8 games and brees started 8. So were both in your top 32? Cause if so you knocked out another starter from your top 32. Or did they not start enough games so there isn’t 32 now and you should go to 15th overall QB. Yup no flawed logic in just choosing 32 qbs 

Yup no flawed logic in claiming 16 ints is average despite not a single QB throwing that many last year.

52 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

I would suggest you not watch something you hate that you love or whatever you said.  

I can't comprehend that though- I am too juvenile and dense.

15 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Ugh

Dick Rod is solid

 

16 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Yup no flawed logic in claiming 16 ints is average despite not a single QB throwing that many last year.

Yup Lamar Jackson’s 26 and 9 is clearly the average for QBs in the league… 

here’s a list of teams where they had multiple QBs start 4 or more games (meaning at least a quarter of a season with multiple starting QBs)

Broncos

saints

eagles 

cowboys 

Washington 

miami

jets

Bengals 

Jags

bears

49ers 

So just going with 32 doesn’t seem flawed at all whatsoever. But you are right they all only had one starter from start to finish so you could justify your just choose the top 32. 

so that’s 11 more added to your 32. Which puts you at 43 that played significant amount of time. So now go back tell me what the average would be? I’m guessing Lamar Jackson isn’t close to average with 26 tds and 9 ints. 

7 minutes ago, WentzFan11 said:

 

New plan... Hurts plays in the first half, and then they put in Minshew as the reliever for the second half, because you know... Hurts' arm gets fatigued as the game wears on.   .  

 

 

(Disclaimer: this is clearly sarcasm poking fun at that pathetic hot take from earlier. )

4 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Yup Lamar Jackson’s 26 and 9 is clearly the average for QBs in the league… 

here’s a list of teams where they had multiple QBs start 4 or more games (meaning at least a quarter of a season with multiple starting QBs)

Broncos

saints

eagles 

cowboys 

Washington 

miami

jets

Bengals 

Jags

bears

49ers 

So just going with 32 doesn’t seem flawed at all whatsoever

Even if you use median ints per team across all 32 teams, you'd still be wrong. 

1 minute ago, Iggles_Phan said:

New plan... Hurts plays in the first half, and then they put in Minshew as the reliever for the second half, because you know... Hurts' arm gets fatigued as the game wears on.   .  

 

 

(Disclaimer: this is clearly sarcasm poking fun at that pathetic hot take from earlier. )

You never know, maybe that's why Urban Meyer threw that 50% of 3 games clause into the Minshew trade. 

19 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

Dick Rod is solid

and gets it done in the slot

15 minutes ago, WentzFan11 said:

 

 

#1 knock on hurts, the biggest idiot in the Philly media is his biggest fan.

16 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Even if you use median ints per team across all 32 teams, you'd still be wrong. 

Sure whatever you want to say. Doing it my way is 21-22 Qb. Meaning the average of those is 16 tds and 10.5 ints. What seems more realistic for average QB play: lamar’s 26-9 or 16-10.5?  Yup Lamar jackson’s play was completely league average last year. your hypothetical is a bunch of BS. Literally Russell Wilson did exactly what you’re talking about last year when he was on fire for 8 games and then was league average (according to your way of statistics the second half of the year) and you for whatever reason don’t wanna accept the voters proved you wrong in not voting for him having Allen and rodgers who were more consistent all year finish ahead of him. Heck mahomes finished ahead of wilson with less td passes then Wilson  

 I’m still waiting on my answer of whether or not Colin Kaepernick played well the first 2 1/2 quarters of that Super Bowl? You’ve yet to answer 

1 hour ago, Alphagrand said:

Interesting to look at the Reagor non-TD on this film.  When Hurts lets go of the football Reagor is at the 15-yard line and well within the boundary.  The Niners DB initiates contact with Reagor as the ball is in the air, Reagor fights through the contact and actually makes an excellent effort to come down with the ball.  Most WR are not going to get to the ball, much less catch it. 

Definitely should have been an illegal contact penalty on the defense; the only way Reagor can get to the ball is to do exactly what he did.  Unfortunate his heel hit the boundary as he was fighting through contact -- but that's clearly illegal contact if not DPI.

The assertion that this play demonstrates a shortcoming on Reagor's part?  Pure baloney.

 

Wrong. He ran his route too close to the sideline giving the DB the chance to turn, look and ride him out of bounds with leverage. 

Sirianni said it himself. He didn’t give himself enough space. 

19 minutes ago, WentzFan11 said:

 

I don't think anyone is suggesting otherwise. Then again, ESP...