2 minutes ago, UK Eagle said:

My oh my

 

I mean what possible radical change could he make that would make any sense besides firing Garrett? Bench Daniel Jones for Mike Glennon? 

17 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

I won't be hungover, if that's the implication.

Still be drunk after the big win? 

1 minute ago, NCiggles said:

I mean what possible radical change could he make that would make any sense besides firing Garrett? Bench Daniel Jones for Mike Glennon? 

Fire Garrett for anyone else. It can't be worse.

4 minutes ago, UK Eagle said:

My oh my

 

The most radical thing they can do is keep everything status quo. 

I really don't see any wins on the Giants schedule until maybe Chicago really late in the season. 

3 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

Amazing how many opportunities he's been given. He's 30 now so it'll likely just be the teams in desperate need of a WR

Lol definitely no HOF for him

Year	Team	Games		Receiving					Rushing					Fumbles
		GP	GS	Rec	Yds	Avg	Lng	TD	Att	Yds	Avg	Lng	TD	Fum	Lost
2012	CLE	16	13	50	805	16.1	71T	5	0	0	0	0	0	1	1
2013	CLE	14	14	87	1,646	18.9	95T	9	5	88	17.6	34	0	0	0
2014	CLE	5	5	24	303	12.6	32	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
2015	CLE	Suspended
2016	CLE	Suspended
2017	CLE	5	5	18	335	18.6	54	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
2018	CLE	1	1	1	17	17.0	17T	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	NE	11	11	40	720	18.0	55T	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
2019	NE	6	6	20	287	14.4	44	1	1	1	1.0	1	0	0	0
	SEA	5	1	7	139	19.9	58	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
2020	SEA	Suspended
Career		63	56	247	4,252	17.2	95T	20	6	89	14.8	34	0	1	1

Picked him up at the end of my fantasy auction in 2013.  He was suspended for the first two games, so was like only $2.  Dude help me win a championship that year.

1 minute ago, NCiggles said:

I mean what possible radical change could he make that would make any sense besides firing Garrett? Bench Daniel Jones for Mike Glennon?

Change pace of play, change the formations, change game plan.  They need to try something different.  I'm glad they aren't, but still

5 minutes ago, UK Eagle said:

They do but they'd ignore a Heisman winning WR to do it. And be back there again 2 years later

Who Green Bay? They weren’t picking high enough to get Smith. They picked at 29. They’d have to give up a ton to move up to 10 to have gotten him. 

42 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

What about the one he tossed to Reagor for a TD down the field but was called back because Reagor's heel stepped out of bounds? 

0-1 on 20+ yard passes.  Maybe PFF will give him credit and make him the 2nd best QB in the NFL.

9 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

I mean what possible radical change could he make that would make any sense besides firing Garrett? Bench Daniel Jones for Mike Glennon? 

Still be drunk after the big win? 

Won't be drinking tonight.   Rarely do.   But, even when I do, I almost never drink to the point of intoxication, and have only been hungover once.  Didn't enjoy it, so I found a limit.

Caplan said Mailata likely not playing this Sunday either. 

13 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Who Green Bay? They weren’t picking high enough to get Smith. They picked at 29. They’d have to give up a ton to move up to 10 to have gotten him. 

Duh, I know that.  It was just a hypothetical around how they run that organisation

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

Caplan said Mailata likely not playing this Sunday either. 

Reminds me of that simpsons episode where marge tells Homer the plant called and said if he doesn’t come in on Friday then he shouldn’t bother to come in on Monday. And homers like "woohooo 4 day weekend”

2 minutes ago, UK Eagle said:

Duh, I know that.  It was just a hypothetical around how they run that organisation

Yeah but how many teams in general move up from 29 to 10 to get a receiver though? If you are moving up that high from that spot it’s almost always for a QB. only team i can remember doing it is the Falcons with julio. 

3 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Won't be drinking tonight.   Rarely do.   But, even when I do, I almost never drink to the point of intoxication, and have only been hungover once.  Didn't enjoy it, so I found a limit.

I'm actually with you there in terms of drinking although I have been hungover more than once.  I may break out some Scotch or Bourbon tonight depending on how it goes.  

2 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Caplan said Mailata likely not playing this Sunday either. 

I thought I saw something reported that a sprained knee was usually a 3-6 week timeline to get back in.

2 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

I'm actually with you there in terms of drinking although I have been hungover more than once.  I may break out some Scotch or Bourbon tonight depending on how it goes.  

Wife doesn't drink, so I almost never have any in the house.  Not too much of a hard liquor guy, I prefer some nice craft beers.

2 minutes ago, Alphagrand said:

I thought I saw something reported that a sprained knee was usually a 3-6 week timeline to get back in.

Depends on the grade. He'd be on IR if it was that long. 

@LeanMeanGM 

Changing my prediction. Hurts has at least 1 turnover.

Looking at different player odds for the game tonight and Corey Clement is on the Cowboys now?

 

He's getting passed around the NFC East.  

49 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Andy Reid loves him some POS.  

He does have experience with dealing with addicts.... 

If Mailata misses 6 weeks and has even a little bit of struggles upon his return, they officially saved no money with that early extension…just saying.

8 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

If Mailata misses 6 weeks and has even a little bit of struggles upon his return, they officially saved no money with that early extension…just saying.

🙈

Dillard starting today makes me nervous

1 minute ago, Dwide Schrude said:

Dillard starting today makes all of us nervous

FYP

5 minutes ago, Dwide Schrude said:

Dillard starting today makes me nervous

I hope Parsons doesn't haze him