February 28, 20224 yr 1 minute ago, Abracadabra said: It's being used in ways contrary to it's original purpose. Perhaps I’m mistaken but I thought natos purpose was always to ensure the security of its members? In what sense is it being used in ways contrary to this?
February 28, 20224 yr Just now, Muz86 said: Perhaps I’m mistaken but I thought natos purpose was always to ensure the security of its members? In what sense is it being used in ways contrary to this? NATO has attacked several countries, if you hadn't noticed. Yugoslavia ring a bell? How about Libya or Syria?
February 28, 20224 yr 2 minutes ago, Muz86 said: Perhaps I’m mistaken but I thought natos purpose was always to ensure the security of its members? In what sense is it being used in ways contrary to this? Because the little dick Russian doesn’t like that his beech president can’t do whatever he wants with his poosay army.
February 28, 20224 yr 32 minutes ago, Thrive said: Wow. Let’s all take a step back here. We are closer to a direct war with Russia than we ever were during the Cold War. Am I wrong? This is insanity. yes, you are wrong https://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/cuban-missile-crisis
February 28, 20224 yr 2 minutes ago, barho said: yes, you are wrong https://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/cuban-missile-crisis Fair enough.
February 28, 20224 yr 2 hours ago, Abracadabra said: Kind of demonstrates how laid back the Russians are being toward civilians. Yes, as they fire missiles at civilian targets. 1 hour ago, Abracadabra said: Taking into account the difference between The United States of America (notice that "The" is part of the proper name) and the United States of America and limited to this particular issue- yes. Dude, you're a sick F. Seriously, you need lithium and a padded room. 1 hour ago, Kz! said: 1 hour ago, Gannan said: Bizarro world. I've been agreeing with Rubio since the invasion. When his head isn't up Trump's rear end, he makes more sense. I like Rubio.
February 28, 20224 yr 45 minutes ago, Abracadabra said: How many of you U.S. bots cheered for this lie? I've stayed away from your posts but the rest of us are either in the US or love the US so you can F right off.
February 28, 20224 yr Just now, JohnSnowsHair said: Do they still have an airfield to launch them from?
February 28, 20224 yr 21 minutes ago, Abracadabra said: NATO has attacked several countries, if you hadn't noticed. Yugoslavia ring a bell? How about Libya or Syria?
February 28, 20224 yr Just now, Diehardfan said: Do they still have an airfield to launch them from? could probably fly them out of Poland I think they do though. I believe the airfield southeast of Kyiv is still good. And out West I would guess they have some, but I don't know.
February 28, 20224 yr 24 minutes ago, Abracadabra said: NATO has attacked several countries, if you hadn't noticed. Yugoslavia ring a bell? How about Libya or Syria? F yeah we did!
February 28, 20224 yr 3 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: could probably fly them out of Poland I think they do though. I believe the airfield southeast of Kyiv is still good. And out West I would guess they have some, but I don't know. Awesome. I wonder if they have enough pilots or if it's going to be like Independence Day....
February 28, 20224 yr 2 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: could probably fly them out of Poland I think they do though. I believe the airfield southeast of Kyiv is still good. And out West I would guess they have some, but I don't know. Fairly certain they can land and take off from highways as well. Seen videos of European nations and the US doing this before.
February 28, 20224 yr Author 4 minutes ago, barho said: Fairly certain they can land and take off from highways as well. Seen videos of European nations and the US doing this before. Probably a one time thing. Most roads are not built to withstand that type of force over and over.
February 28, 20224 yr 42 minutes ago, Abracadabra said: NATO has attacked several countries, if you hadn't noticed. Yugoslavia ring a bell? How about Libya or Syria? So, basically Putin is NATO, just invading Bosnia to help out trapped Serbians? Do I have your position correctly? It is hard for me to say, what with your break with reality still on-going.
February 28, 20224 yr 1 minute ago, Toastrel said: So, basically Putin is NATO, just invading Bosnia to help out trapped Serbians? Do I have your position correctly? It is hard for me to say, what with your break with reality still on-going. That dude makes Alex Jones look normal.
February 28, 20224 yr Fiat Currency Zero Hour Quote "If China and Russia devise successful alternatives to the dollar-centered financial system, and if these alternatives gain significant international traction, we would be witnessing a cataclysmic moment in great power rivalry."
February 28, 20224 yr 26 minutes ago, Diehardfan said: Awesome. I wonder if they have enough pilots or if it's going to be like Independence Day.... Randy quaid is available
February 28, 20224 yr 15 minutes ago, Diehardfan said: Props to actually doing it and not just saying he'll do it
February 28, 20224 yr 6 minutes ago, Toastrel said: So, basically Putin is NATO, just invading Bosnia to help out trapped Serbians? Do I have your position correctly? It is hard for me to say, what with your break with reality still on-going. Did NATO bomb Yugoslavia? Yes. Did NATO have UN authorization? No. Was NATO acting on behalf of one of it's members? No. My position is that NATO has repeatedly acted outside of it's intended purpose. The Warsaw Pact no longer exists and NATO no longer serves the role of countering that which is gone.
February 28, 20224 yr 6 minutes ago, Abracadabra said: Did NATO bomb Yugoslavia? Yes. Did NATO have UN authorization? No. Was NATO acting on behalf of one of it's members? No. My position is that NATO has repeatedly acted outside of it's intended purpose. The Warsaw Pact no longer exists and NATO no longer serves the role of countering that which is gone. Let’s say you are right. Ok but that does not make what Russia is doing right.
Create an account or sign in to comment