6 hours ago, toolg said:

Here's what sucks about the whole situation. Putin is going to use Griner as a pawn to get some assassins and arms dealers out of Western prison. Probably Russian spies. In exchange for a basketball player that wanted to vape some marijuana in her free time.

 

It's for Griner and Paul Whelan, who is likely a spy for the US.

Maybe we can sweeten the pot and include these two.

 

This shows why you really can't believe anything you read in the media

https://www.independentsentinel.com/report-ukraines-falling-apart-wh-looks-for-an-exit/

Report: Ukraine’s Falling Apart, WH Looks for an Exit

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10613069/Putins-forces-able-fight-14-days-military-experts-say.html

Putin's forces may only be able to keep up the fight for another 14 days, defence sources say as increasingly-desperate invaders launch more devastating strikes on Kyiv this morning

7 minutes ago, Procus said:

This shows why you really can't believe anything you read in the media

https://www.independentsentinel.com/report-ukraines-falling-apart-wh-looks-for-an-exit/

 

the idiot lawyer: "you can't believe anything you read in the media"

then posts a link from:

 

 

 

reality? "I don't agree with what the news is saying, let me 'research' until I find some crackpot 'media' outlet that agrees with me! that'll show em!"

12 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

the idiot lawyer: "you can't believe anything you read in the media"

then posts a link from:

 

 

 

reality? "I don't agree with what the news is saying, let me 'research' until I find some crackpot 'media' outlet that agrees with me! that'll show em!"

The story popped up on my twitter feed you moron.  I didn't trust it so was looking for something else.  But you get triggered by competing stories from specious sources.  Anybody who knows anything knows the media can't be trusted.  Hey, but saying the media can't be trusted is a good reason to get triggered. 

Here's another reason to get triggered you simpleton (and let me preemptively respond to your no doubt triggered reaction about a National Review article - I posted for the Tom Friedman quote from a NYT opinion piece that couldn't be accessed due to a paywall)

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/why-is-the-white-house-quietly-griping-about-zelensky-now/

Why Is the White House Quietly Griping about Zelensky Now?

20 minutes ago, Procus said:

The story popped up on my twitter feed you moron.  I didn't trust it so was looking for something else.  But you get triggered by competing stories from specious sources.  Anybody who knows anything knows the media can't be trusted.  Hey, but saying the media can't be trusted is a good reason to get triggered. 

Here's another reason to get triggered you simpleton (and let me preemptively respond to your no doubt triggered reaction about a National Review article - I posted for the Tom Friedman quote from a NYT opinion piece that couldn't be accessed due to a paywall)

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/why-is-the-white-house-quietly-griping-about-zelensky-now/

Why Is the White House Quietly Griping about Zelensky Now?

Settle down Beavis.

1 hour ago, Procus said:

The story popped up on my twitter feed you moron.  I didn't trust it so was looking for something else.  But you get triggered by competing stories from specious sources.  Anybody who knows anything knows the media can't be trusted.  Hey, but saying the media can't be trusted is a good reason to get triggered. 

Here's another reason to get triggered you simpleton (and let me preemptively respond to your no doubt triggered reaction about a National Review article - I posted for the Tom Friedman quote from a NYT opinion piece that couldn't be accessed due to a paywall)

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/why-is-the-white-house-quietly-griping-about-zelensky-now/

Why Is the White House Quietly Griping about Zelensky Now?

You realize that's because the predictive algorithm thought it was something you'd be interested in right?  That's the whole point of your feed.  So essentially Twitter has identified you as a low IQ rube who will swallow conservative propaganda with the gusto of a husky sorority girl with daddy issues.  Kudos.

The "it must be true, I saw it on twitter” is freaking classic!  More of this please!

2 hours ago, DEagle7 said:

You realize that's because the predictive algorithm thought it was something you'd be interested in right?  That's the whole point of your feed.  So essentially Twitter has identified you as a low IQ rube who will swallow conservative propaganda with the gusto of a husky sorority girl with daddy issues.  Kudos.

Don't you have a pre teen to give puberty blockers to. 

4 minutes ago, Procus said:

Don't you have a pre teen to give puberty blockers to. 

11 minutes ago, Gannan said:

Not in the least. Just responding to a kook. Just look at his avatar. Not sure why all of you are so triggered over a couple of articles

38 minutes ago, Procus said:

Not in the least. Just responding to a kook. Just look at his avatar. Not sure why all of you are so triggered over a couple of articles

We all can't be as cool as "the lawyer" sporting a stuffed cabbage avatar.

2 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

We all can't be as cool as "the lawyer" sporting a stuffed cabbage avatar.

One is a joke that you may or may not like the other is a bizarre SJW statement. 

But again, all this in response to a couple of articles w differing statements which goes to show that many in the herd here react not to the content but to the poster

1 hour ago, Procus said:

Don't you have a pre teen to give puberty blockers to. 

 

50 minutes ago, Procus said:

Not in the least. Just responding to a kook. Just look at his avatar. Not sure why all of you are so triggered over a couple of articles

 

22 minutes ago, Procus said:

One is a joke that you may or may not like the other is a bizarre SJW statement. 

But again, all this in response to a couple of articles w differing statements which goes to show that many in the herd here react not to the content but to the poster

Yeah valid point, "Be Gay, Do Crimes" sounds like a super serious statement to be taken literally. I retract my previous post, your honor.

1 hour ago, Procus said:

Not in the least. Just responding to a kook. Just look at his avatar. Not sure why all of you are so triggered over a couple of articles

What's wrong with my avatar? 😢

11 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Yeah valid point, "Be Gay, Do Crimes" sounds like a super serious statement to be taken literally. I retract my previous post, your honor.

Your honor is how you address a judge, not a lawyer.  
 

F- again.  

Just now, paco said:

Your honor is how you address a judge, not a lawyer.   
 

F- again

In this fantasy of his, he can be both.

10 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:

What's wrong with my avatar? 😢

What does it even mean?

16 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Yeah valid point, "Be Gay, Do Crimes" sounds like a super serious statement to be taken literally. I retract my previous post, your honor.

Good. At least you know your place. 

2 minutes ago, Procus said:

What does it even mean?

I like sodomy and larceny. Duh. 

11 minutes ago, paco said:

Your honor is how you address a judge, not a lawyer.  
 

F- again.  

The correct way to address him is "Smarty Jones, Esquire" 

1 hour ago, DEagle7 said:

I like sodomy and larceny. Duh.

All kidding aside doc, what does it mean?

5 hours ago, DEagle7 said:

You realize that's because the predictive algorithm thought it was something you'd be interested in right?  That's the whole point of your feed. 

Fine, then explain how the dailymail article came up with an almost opposite slant

1 hour ago, Procus said:

Fine, then explain how the dailymail article came up with an almost opposite slant

The algorithm knows how easy it is to fool retarded people.