February 28, 2025Feb 28 1 minute ago, DrPhilly said: How does that help Ukraine when Putin attacks again in one year? I get what you’re saying and I’d rather have full support of Ukraine instead of Russia, but what other choice do they have at the moment? Chances are slim that it works, but at least now you have the US on the record with some type of interest in Ukraine. It’s just a very complicated situation and that’s why it is horrific that we have a circus clown running the show.
February 28, 2025Feb 28 2 hours ago, Diehardfan said: LOL call a spade a spade. JD was spot on "You bring people on a propaganda tour. Do you think it's respectful to come to the U.S. Oval Office and attack the administration that's trying to prevent the destruction of your country?" He's a grifter. A trump supporter calling out another politician a grifter….. Now I’ve seen it all
February 28, 2025Feb 28 1 minute ago, BBE said: And the US would never unilaterally give it under any administration. Well then here we are...
February 28, 2025Feb 28 Just now, BBE said: Mike Minihan. Might want to educate yourself. You misunderstood, I don’t care who said it, it is just the opinion of one of many generals. But hey, let’s pretend giving up Ukraine to Russia won’t embolden China to go ahead and take Tawain.
February 28, 2025Feb 28 1 hour ago, DrPhilly said: Have you ever lived in or near a large US city? And risk encountering people who aren't in a MAGA echo chamber?
February 28, 2025Feb 28 8 minutes ago, Frankfurteagle89 said: I get what you’re saying and I’d rather have full support of Ukraine instead of Russia, but what other choice do they have at the moment? Chances are slim that it works, but at least now you have the US on the record with some type of interest in Ukraine. It’s just a very complicated situation and that’s why it is horrific that we have a circus clown running the show. They have no good choices
February 28, 2025Feb 28 1 hour ago, BBE said: Do you realize that the US is not capable of outside of Britain and France unilaterally maintaining that stability? Sorry, I really don't like this particular proxy war. And honestly the military's focus is on a hot war with China in the next two years which we are far from ready to execute. What part of this administration signals readiness or forethought to take on that agenda?
February 28, 2025Feb 28 11 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said: You misunderstood, I don’t care who said it, it is just the opinion of one of many generals. But hey, let’s pretend giving up Ukraine to Russia won’t embolden China to go ahead and take Tawain. I'm not pretending anything. China has become the predominant adversary of concern for the US military. China is where the concern is. And a real fear China will win without having a second front with Russia. So given the choice, let Putin have Ukraine. The resources are better allocated to the Pacific AOR.
February 28, 2025Feb 28 10 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: What part of this administration signals readiness or forethought to take on that agenda? The China agenda has been in place since 2017.
February 28, 2025Feb 28 3 minutes ago, BBE said: I'm not pretending anything. China has become the predominant adversary of concern for the US military. China is where the concern is. And a real fear China will win without having a second front with Russia. So given the choice, let Putin have Ukraine. The resources are better allocated to the Pacific AOR. I'm looking forward to revisiting this with you when Trump turns on Taiwan and starts kissing China's ass too.
February 28, 2025Feb 28 Just now, Gannan said: I'm looking forward to revisiting this with you when Trump turns on Taiwan and starts kissing China's ass too. The issue there is that there is a defense pact with Taiwan. Apples and oranges.
February 28, 2025Feb 28 2 minutes ago, Gannan said: I'm looking forward to revisiting this with you when Trump turns on Taiwan and starts kissing China's ass too. Further, the TRA makes that a Congressional decision, oddly enough.
February 28, 2025Feb 28 Just now, BBE said: The issue there is that there is a defense pact with Taiwan. Apples and oranges. Trump will not fight his buddy Xi for Taiwan. He could care less about that island. As long as the dollars are pouring into his chamber of wealth, he could care less about a silly war in Asia or Europe. There is an ocean between those continents, remember?!
February 28, 2025Feb 28 Just now, Frankfurteagle89 said: Trump will not fight his buddy Xi for Taiwan. He could care less about that island. As long as the dollars are pouring into his chamber of wealth, he could care less about a silly war in Asia or Europe. There is an ocean between those continents, remember?! It is a matter for Congress per the TRA which expressly forbids the President from unilaterally changing policy on Taiwan.
February 28, 2025Feb 28 2 minutes ago, BBE said: It is a matter for Congress per the TRA which expressly forbids the President from unilaterally changing policy on Taiwan. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
February 28, 2025Feb 28 3 minutes ago, BBE said: It is a matter for Congress per the TRA which expressly forbids the President from unilaterally changing policy on Taiwan. You do know which party controls Congress at the moment?!
February 28, 2025Feb 28 I'm sure he'll start acknowledging the appropriate political procedures and listen to Congress and the courts any day now
February 28, 2025Feb 28 9 minutes ago, BBE said: The issue there is that there is a defense pact with Taiwan. Apples and oranges. Ummm not really. We had a defense pact with Ukraine too when we made them give up their nukes. Also lol if you think Trump knows or cares about pacts made before he was in charge.
February 28, 2025Feb 28 Just now, Frankfurteagle89 said: You do know which party controls Congress at the moment?! Barely. And there are sufficient China hawks to prevent any shift from the status quo.
February 28, 2025Feb 28 1 minute ago, Gannan said: Ummm not really. We had a defense pact with Ukraine too when we made them give up their nukes. Also lol if you think Trump knows or cares about pacts made before he was in charge. Read the TRA.
February 28, 2025Feb 28 1 minute ago, BBE said: Barely. And there are sufficient China hawks to prevent any shift from the status quo. Nah man, sorry. Those weaklings will nicely fall in line with whatever Mr. Trump wants.
February 28, 2025Feb 28 45 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: This guy was previously charged with treason Yes, that is the modus operandi of a banana republic like Ukraine. In Brasil, they locked up Balonsaro. Venezuela arrested Machado. We see what Putin does to his opponents. Alexi Navalny was arrested - are you saying that his actions against Putin were not justified?
Create an account or sign in to comment