Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Author
2 minutes ago, Kz! said:
 

 

Stupid, irresponsible headline is stupid and irresponsible.

I did see some leftist turd on FB yesterday post "storm the court" after defending sitting out the 2016 election, though.

  • Replies 5.1k
  • Views 155.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • vikas83
    vikas83

    Putting aside one’s stance on the issue, we should all agree that it is egregious and dangerous that this was leaked. Draft opinions should remain private and debated among the justices. Not every cas

  • vikas83
    vikas83

    I meant someone competent. You go ahead and enjoy that White Castle at your leisure.

  • the meme template you didn't know you needed!        

Posted Images

32 minutes ago, EaglesRocker97 said:

 

Stupid, irresponsible headline is stupid and irresponsible.

I did see some leftist turd on FB yesterday post "storm the court" after defending sitting out the 2016 election, though.

Storm WTF for?  i said from the outset I was against court packing until they overturned Roe.  Pack that M'f'cker and pack it good.  

It is way past time to stop debating this like we are talking to rational people who want a happy medium here.  Forget about something sane like "keeping it at 15 weeks on demand".  To these hocus pocus morality hypocrites this is a war, because religions need wars to exist.  This is about dead babies to them, nevermind they are the exact same people turning back tens of thousands of baptized children at the border (from countries with restrictive abortion laws, OF F"ING COURSE).  They are willing to plot for 30 years and overturn democracy itself to win this war on abortion.  

 

And here we are, 2022 and half the Us is about to effectively illegalize abortion  Yes illegalize it, because on paper it will be legal, but in reality there will be 1 or 2 clinics per state, under siege and run by **** shaming theocratic lunatics.  There will be bounties on women who cross state to perform one.  Pay no attention to the limited abortion they are offering, it's 10000% bogus.

 

That's who we are dealing with and that's why you can't give them any godamn quarter about rape or incest when you engage.  You punt this ball as far as you f'ing can because a supreme court decision that set it at 23 weeks and stood for decades wasn't enough to stop them.

The President says you’re killing children. Good luck with that.

"The idea that we're going to make a judgment that is going to say that no one can make the judgment to choose to abort a child, based on a decision by the Supreme Court, I think goes way overboard,” Biden said Tuesday, emphasis added. "If this decision holds, it's really quite a radical decision.” 

Triggered much? Settle down, beavis

2 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said:

Triggered much? Settle down, beavis

 

BEA0E4F1-D72B-4C6A-9D2A-FCCCDC4D18A1.jpeg

image.gif.4d04f912bb6f30ab931a5b346c643eb9.gif

6 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said:

Triggered much? Settle down, beavis

You’re talking to who?

56 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said:

Why limit that perspective to rape?

Every time anyone has sex they accept the risk of pregnancy and disease. 

No I still think we should abort about half of all pregnancies 

2 minutes ago, 20dawk4life said:

No I still think we should abort about half of all pregnancies 

Backwards abortion laws in Latin America are a huge reason for the border problems.  Mexico's femicide problems have a lot to do with lack of abortions. The US is already the most incarcerated nation in the history of the world.  WTF is the rationale for more unwanted babies?  Are we planning for a land war with China?  FFS.

 

Violent abortionists surround and attack two minority officers in LA:

As per arguments I've had with multiple ishlibs in here, if anyone refuses an officer's order to get back and continues advancing, the officers would have been well within their rights to fire into the crowd. Still, I'm glad these two showed restraint. 

  • Author

It's pretty hilarious how, from the moment of conception, Republicans' 6-year-old understanding of human biology is that a woman automatically has a fully formed "baby" in her. 

Stay in school, kids :roll:

Just now, EaglesRocker97 said:

It's pretty hilarious how, from the moment of conception, Republicans' 6-year old understanding of human biology is that woman automatically has a "baby" in her. 

Stay in school, kids :roll:

A liberal using "woman" and "biology" in the same sentence without a shred of embarrassment or irony is peak cvon.

  • Author
1 minute ago, Kz! said:

A liberal using "woman" and "biology" in the same sentence without a shred of embarrassment or irony is peak cvon.

 

Look, I call people whatever they want, but I still fully subscribe to the traditional understanding of human biology. This is just a man with a mutilated dick, but shhhhhhhhh



image.png.2a83c05025c5699676a66b3d8269ea2e.png
 

26 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

You’re talking to who?

 

you-talking-to-me-what.gif

  • Author
Quote

Life begins at birth — it says so in Genesis

Finally! A letter about abortion that actually makes sense. L.G. Connor of Ellicott City is absolutely right — before anyone can take a position on abortion they must first answer the question of when life begins ("When does life begin?” Aug. 6). And that's an easy one. The Bible tells us in no uncertain terms when life begins. In Genesis, chapter one, God answers that question himself. He forms a figure from the Earth, but it does not become Adam ("man" in Hebrew) until God "breathes into him the breath of life, and he became man.”

Clearly, life begins when you draw your first breath. That is when God places your soul in your body. Your soul enters your body with your first breath and it leaves with your last. The body is just a vessel — your being, your humanity, is your immortal soul. That's what the Bible says, and for the life of me I cannot understand why so many people, especially supposedly religious people, get this wrong. There is no question, no moral ambiguity. Abortion destroys an empty vessel, it does not kill a human being.

That is not to say that a fetus isn't alive, because it clearly is. So is a cow, or an earthworm, or a tree. However, simply being alive does not make something a human being. Having a soul is what sets us apart from other living things. Otherwise, every farmer and every lumberjack would be a murderer. And so would all of the rest of us who eat living things. Even the hardcore vegans would be murderers since they eat plants and plants are alive too.

So really, without some sort of religious or moral framework, there isn't any difference between killing a person and cutting down a tree. And that sounds like a pretty stupid position to be arguing. But if you follow your religious beliefs, the answer to the abortion question is crystal clear to anyone who can read. Abortion is not murder, as it does not take the life of another human being. It isn't any sort of moral question at all, it's simply a medical issue. I'm just mystified why the Pope doesn't get this one right. I'm sure he has a Bible kicking around the Vatican somewhere. If only he would take the time to read it.

https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/readers-respond/bs-ed-rr-abortion-law-letter-20180807-story.html

 

19 hours ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

why would anyone take the time to explain anything to you ? seriously ? are you even 16yrs old ? 

devil's advocate - where does it say we have a right to kill unborn children ? 

Ultimately boils down to when does a fetus get constitutional rights. 

4 minutes ago, Gannan said:

Ultimately boils down to when does a fetus get constitutional rights. 

i can't claim it as a dependent until birf!  

  • Author
6 minutes ago, Gannan said:

Ultimately boils down to when does a fetus get constitutional rights. 

 

TEW: "When they're a net taxpayer!"

luva9ppehgx81.jpg

:worthy:   

One thing is Clear. The Federalist Society Litmus Test for Radical Conservative Judges to be on their list, seems to have worked. that is after Republicans stole court seats. 

 

1 minute ago, mr_hunt said:

luva9ppehgx81.jpg

:worthy:   

Welcome to Red America.

Instead of packing the court, Dems should go after Thomas. 

Just now, DrPhilly said:

Instead of packing the court, Dems should go after Thomas. 

I don't really know what "go after Thomas" means.  He's a disgrace to the country and has no business being on the SC, but much like court packing, impeachment has no chance of happening.

2 hours ago, Dave Moss said:

Back in the day there was a poster name GooglyMoogly who banged his cousin then started a thread about it.

:roll: :roll: 

I think I found him on Youtube.  

 

 

4 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

I don't really know what "go after Thomas" means.  He's a disgrace to the country and has no business being on the SC, but much like court packing, impeachment has no chance of happening.

Remove his seditious wife supporting ass from a court he has no business being a member of.

Create an account or sign in to comment