Jump to content

Featured Replies

14 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Ah, if it was a story about TEW I'm sure it will be an accurate retelling and not a bunch of random misremembered interpretations of one of his arguments. Like, remember the time he said border police should just start massacring illegals with machine guns! :excited: 

My unimpeachable record of completely unbiased, fact based arguments and historical recounts on this forum speaks for itself. 

  • Replies 5.1k
  • Views 155.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • vikas83
    vikas83

    Putting aside one’s stance on the issue, we should all agree that it is egregious and dangerous that this was leaked. Draft opinions should remain private and debated among the justices. Not every cas

  • vikas83
    vikas83

    I meant someone competent. You go ahead and enjoy that White Castle at your leisure.

  • the meme template you didn't know you needed!        

Posted Images

16 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said:

KZ would let the mother die. Talk about insane.

image.jpeg.6fe50c5a690972731638790fd258c6eb.jpeg

Because she's black?

1 minute ago, jsdarkstar said:

Well it didn't take long for Fox News to blame the new Nominee without any evidence whatsoever. 

And impeach the justice for leaking, but not impeach the Justice whose wife supported overthrowing the Government. Got it.

Fox News is just quoting the Chief Justice.  Typical liberal - blame the messenger.  What about the quote are you blaming Fox News for?

Here, go blame CNN which pretty much printed the same article.  smh.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/05/politics/john-roberts-supreme-court-leak/index.html

4 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said:

Well it didn't take long for Fox News to blame the new Nominee without any evidence whatsoever. 

 

 

newsmax did that...not sure if fox did as well. 

3 minutes ago, Procus said:

To me, the $64,000 question is whether there have been other drafts of opinions in the past striking down Roe, only to be watered down once the final opinion issued. 

I'd have to think so, at least as a very preliminary draft done by one justice. Politico reports that this has 5 judges' support, implying it was assigned to Alito as opposed to being something he just had his clerks put together.  

We'll all just have to wait and see what comes out as the final. 

2 minutes ago, Procus said:

Fox News is just quoting the Chief Justice.  Typical liberal - blame the messenger.  What about the quote are you blaming Fox News for?

Here, go blame CNN which pretty much printed the same article.  smh.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/05/politics/john-roberts-supreme-court-leak/index.html

Uh huh, Newsmax and FOX and pretty much the same entity. 

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2022/5/4/2095835/-Newsmax-host-has-the-caucasity-to-accuse-Justice-Ketanji-Brown-Jackson-of-leaking-Alito-opinion

Newsmax host has the caucasity to accuse Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson of leaking Alito opinion

Instead of addressing that the U.S. Supreme Court is contemplating a reversal on Roe v. Wade, despite the fact that 69% of Americans are in favor of it, Newsmax host Grant Stinchfield went on a farcical rant Tuesday about who he believes is behind the leaked draft opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito.

No big surprise here, but Stinchfield called Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson his " first suspect.”

3 minutes ago, mr_hunt said:

 

newsmax did that...not sure if fox did as well. 

Yep. Is there a difference?

6 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said:

Well it didn't take long for Fox News to blame the new Nominee without any evidence whatsoever. 

And impeach the justice for leaking, but not impeach the Justice whose wife supported overthrowing the Government. Got it.

I know your role here, but give it a rest. There's a difference between leaking a confidential opinion in an attempt to destroy the confidentiality of the process, and a justice's wife being a loon. 

If it can be proven that Thomas' voted the way he did in order to protect his wife, then he should be impeached. Without that you can't impeach a guy for having poor taste in a spouse.

Comparing the 2 situations is ridiculous and utterly predictable from the left.

9 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said:

Uh huh, Newsmax and FOX and pretty much the same entity. 

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2022/5/4/2095835/-Newsmax-host-has-the-caucasity-to-accuse-Justice-Ketanji-Brown-Jackson-of-leaking-Alito-opinion

Newsmax host has the caucasity to accuse Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson of leaking Alito opinion

Instead of addressing that the U.S. Supreme Court is contemplating a reversal on Roe v. Wade, despite the fact that 69% of Americans are in favor of it, Newsmax host Grant Stinchfield went on a farcical rant Tuesday about who he believes is behind the leaked draft opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito.

No big surprise here, but Stinchfield called Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson his " first suspect.”

Yep. Is there a difference?

So again, what about the quote from Fox News do you have a problem with?

My current suspicion is that somebody on the staff saw the draft, and told somebody else about it - then that person got their hands on it.

I wonder if they will catch the person that took it? I doubt it, unless they are stupid, which these days, is 50-50, so who knows?

7 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

My current suspicion is that somebody on the staff saw the draft, and told somebody else about it - then that person got their hands on it.

I wonder if they will catch the person that took it? I doubt it, unless they are stupid, which these days, is 50-50, so who knows?

How would ‘’somebody else’’ get their hands on it when drafts never, ever leave the building?

22 minutes ago, Procus said:

So again, what about the quote from Fox News do you have a problem with?

The part where it says ‘’Fox News’’.

hvkygnvdytx81.jpg

5 minutes ago, mr_hunt said:

hvkygnvdytx81.jpg

Republicans are mentally ill. :roll:  All of them.

1 hour ago, mayanh8 said:

I'm old enough to remember one of the usual EMB suspects in this very thread rallying around some MAGAt caught on camera screaming racist threats at an 8 year old girl walking in her own neighborhood. The justification of the behavior was that the racist MAGAt didn't physically harm anyone and that while they wouldn't do it themselves this individual was free to harass and intimidate anyone he wanted because it wasn't against the law. 

How times have changed...

I am pretty sure it was on this board, maybe in the Floyd thread, and I am pretty sure that poster worked at kmart.

9 minutes ago, mr_hunt said:

hvkygnvdytx81.jpg

It's happening all according to plan!!!!

1 minute ago, paco said:

It's happening all according to plan!!!!

Now that the plan is leaked will it change the outcome?

5 minutes ago, GreenReaper said:

Now that the plan is leaked will it change the outcome?

Also part of the plan.  It's like Oceans 11

23 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

How would ‘’somebody else’’ get their hands on it when drafts never, ever leave the building?

Gee, you mean, how would a criminal steal something?

Inconceivable Shocked GIFs - Get the best GIF on GIPHY

25 minutes ago, mr_hunt said:

hvkygnvdytx81.jpg

Finally!

33 minutes ago, Toastrel said:

Gee, you mean, how would a criminal steal something?

Inconceivable Shocked GIFs - Get the best GIF on GIPHY

How would someone else who has no access to a draft take it to leak?  The only people they're available to are clerks and justices.  That's it.

Disgusting ishlib animals remain disgusting. 

  • Author

image.thumb.png.0237b36151453d0cc9dd20f7554ecd59.png

Who knew that making everything free could be so great!? Thanks Bernie bro public school employee! :lol: 

  • Author
Just now, Kz! said:

Who knew that making everything free could be so great!? Thanks Bernie bro public school employee! :lol: 

 

There were 8 blocks and only one said "Free," but yeah, I guess that's everything.

31 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

How would someone else who has no access to a draft take it to leak?  The only people they're available to are clerks and justices.  That's it.

Sure, and no clerk or justice ever had anybody who shouldn't have been somewhere, inside.

Not possible.

There is an easy solution to this debate nobody wants to talk about:

Image

Create an account or sign in to comment