May 10, 20223 yr 2 hours ago, Gannan said: The right loves unenforceable laws. In NC when I lived there we were somehow supposed to make sure ladies didn't have a schlong before using the restroom. Yeah, spotting trannies is really difficult. I mean, who can tell, really?
May 10, 20223 yr 20 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: She was dead Mine too, but I endured plenty of Probably's mom jokes so I just kind of take the openings when they're there. No offense intended.
May 10, 20223 yr Just now, Gannan said: Mine too, but I endured plenty of Probably's mom jokes so I just kind of take the openings when they're there. No offense intended. No offense taken, fire away!
May 10, 20223 yr 15 minutes ago, Kz! said: Yeah, spotting trannies is really difficult. I mean, who can tell, really? While that's true, let's be real here...it's the south. Because of all of the inbreeding, plenty of legit women down there look like men.
May 10, 20223 yr 3 hours ago, Gannan said: I asked this in the other thread, but this is the better place for it. What are the chances of "Death penalty for women who get an abortion" is part of the 2024 gop platform?" My wife thinks the republicans aren't crazy enough to do this, I think she is grossly underestimating them. Would make sense, so they won’t do it.
May 10, 20223 yr Press secretary inciting criminal activity in violation of federal statutes. Wonder how she'd like it if protestors harassed her family at home.
May 10, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, Procus said: Press secretary inciting criminal activity in violation of federal statutes. Wonder how she'd like it if protestors harassed her family at home. Trumpbots: I can't believe she *checks notes* encouraged people outside judges homes to remain peaceful
May 10, 20223 yr Classic. Not worded the best way by the WH spokesperson but clearly she isn't saying the WH encourages protesting outside the justices' homes.
May 10, 20223 yr 5 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: Classic. Not worded the best way by the WH spokesperson but clearly she isn't saying the WH encourages protesting outside the justices' homes. Agree- and she/nor the President are saying anything to discourage it either.
May 10, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, Ipiggles said: Agree- and she/nor the President are saying anything to discourage it either. Exactly, they should
May 10, 20223 yr 2 minutes ago, Toastrel said: Peaceful protest is not just a right, it can be a civic duty. I would draw the line that the protests should not be in front of peoples personal homes. Otherwise I would agree.
May 10, 20223 yr Author The meme references a SCOTUS case, not sure what they'd be referring to. Could be FakeNewz.
May 10, 20223 yr 16 minutes ago, Toastrel said: Peaceful protest is not just a right, it can be a civic duty. 100% - but there's federal legislation preventing these types of protests at the justices homes
May 10, 20223 yr 19 minutes ago, Ipiggles said: I would draw the line that the protests should not be in front of peoples personal homes. Otherwise I would agree. Me too
May 10, 20223 yr Author 6 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: Me too There are homes everywhere, that kind of regulation on speech could get pretty dicey. I would expect a free-speech absolutist such as yourself to perceive the problem here.
May 10, 20223 yr Author Food for thought: During the Revolution, colonists protested outside of Royal officials' homes and burned them in effigy.
May 10, 20223 yr 10 minutes ago, EaglesRocker97 said: Food for thought: During the Revolution, colonists protested outside of Royal officials' homes and burned them in effigy. What did the U.S. Code have to say about that activity at the time?
May 10, 20223 yr Author 3 minutes ago, Procus said: What did the U.S. Code have to say about that activity at the time? Nothing, since it didn't exist, but it's interesting to consider that the founding generation employed these kinds of tactics, since the right is so fond of nostalgically invoking the memory of 1776 to justify any action considered to be taken in defense of freedom.
May 10, 20223 yr 53 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: Classic. Not worded the best way by the WH spokesperson but clearly she isn't saying the WH encourages protesting outside the justices' homes. It’s purposefully left ambiguous because they do encourage it. And what they are encouraging is illegal.
May 10, 20223 yr 40 minutes ago, Ipiggles said: I would draw the line that the protests should not be in front of peoples personal homes. Otherwise I would agree. Broken clock theory - I agree. Protesting is about petitioning the government for redress of grievances. There needs to be separation between the private and public life of a civil servant. Protesting at the SC? Absolutely. Protesting outside someone's private home? No. That's harassment and intimidation, and invites terroristic threats.
May 10, 20223 yr Just now, JohnSnowsHair said: Broken clock theory - I agree. Protesting is about petitioning the government for redress of grievances. There needs to be separation between the private and public life of a civil servant. Protesting at the SC? Absolutely. Protesting outside someone's private home? No. That's harassment and intimidation, and invites terroristic threats. And as KZ pointed out, it’s literally illegal.
Create an account or sign in to comment