June 24, 20223 yr 2 minutes ago, vikas83 said: I mean, wouldn’t such a law be struck down by this SCOTUS? he's playing the long game, man. planning ahead for when president hogg is in the white house.
June 24, 20223 yr Author 7 minutes ago, vikas83 said: I mean, wouldn’t such a law be struck down by this SCOTUS? Exactly, I have no idea why people are hung up on this. I guess they need something to cling to.
June 24, 20223 yr 10 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: Suddenly we do seem to know the definition of "woman”. Perhaps a tiny step forward as a side effect of the ruling.
June 24, 20223 yr Author 5 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said: Not necessarily. If the law is based on sex discrimination and Equal Protection, instead of privacy, how then can the Court say it's decided wrong or Unconstitutional, if it is based on the Constitution, just as RBG suggested. The Court will do whatever the hell it wants. They have no real legal principles. They're just making it up as they go.
June 24, 20223 yr Now that the ruling came down, we all agree that the leak almost certainly came from one of the right wing judges to soften the blow, right?
June 24, 20223 yr Author 8 minutes ago, Paul852 said: Yeah, up until this point November was going to be a bloodbath for Dems. This probably changes things a bit. Nah, they'll whine for a few weeks and then forget about it and wake up on November 9th like, "Oh, wait...that was yesterday?"
June 24, 20223 yr 26 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: I'm old enough to remember when the right used to complain about "activist judges" I’m old enough to remember yesterday when the Supreme Court said states couldn’t regulate guns
June 24, 20223 yr 2 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: Now that the ruling came down, we all agree that the leak almost certainly came from one of the right wing judges to soften the blow, right? No. It almost certainly came from the left in an attempt to pressure SCOTUS against the ruling. The assassination attempt failed though.
June 24, 20223 yr Things have progressed generally in other areas, e.g. inflation, that I no longer see this decision as being overly significant come November.
June 24, 20223 yr 13 minutes ago, vikas83 said: I mean, wouldn’t such a law be struck down by this SCOTUS? Democrats need to start understanding the art of the possible. They can’t even understand the difference between a man and a woman and you want them to understand the law?
June 24, 20223 yr Look forward to the first criminal murder trial over a women who has a miscarriage. The GOP will claim she had an illegal abortion. The doctor who treats her to clean out the remains will be charged as an accessory. Nothing like punishing women and doctors.
June 24, 20223 yr Just now, TEW said: No. It almost certainly came from the left in an attempt to pressure SCOTUS against the ruling. The assassination attempt failed though. Yeah, a foolproof plan like drive to Maryland, sit in your car and call the cops on yourself almost certainly came from the top.
June 24, 20223 yr 5 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: Suddenly we do seem to know the definition of "woman”. Perhaps a tiny step forward as a side effect of the ruling. I might be wrong here, but I think this side benefit will be only temporary.
June 24, 20223 yr 14 minutes ago, vikas83 said: I mean, wouldn’t such a law be struck down by this SCOTUS? Democrats need to start understanding the art of the possible. Round and round they go. SC says the court decision wasn't legal. Striking down legislation would be a totally different ruling. Democrats should play hardball. If they were to get a majority, they should stack the court
June 24, 20223 yr 1 minute ago, VanHammersly said: Yeah, a foolproof plan like drive to Maryland, sit in your car and call the cops on yourself almost certainly came from the top. I never said democrats were competent.
June 24, 20223 yr 3 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: Things have progressed generally in other areas, e.g. inflation You don’t live here!
June 24, 20223 yr 4 minutes ago, EaglesRocker97 said: Here's an idea: Put abortion clinics on federal property. He's moved on to the bargaining stage.
June 24, 20223 yr Just now, TEW said: They can’t even understand the difference between a man and a woman and you want them to understand the law? Yay. You just over took the lead for the dumbest post of the day. The former was joking, you are clearly not. Great Job.
June 24, 20223 yr Author 1 minute ago, Kz! said: He's moved on to the bargaining stage. I call it the "problem-solving stage."
June 24, 20223 yr Author United States v. Morrison: It's all teed up for them to strike down any federal law codifying abortion. The Court says they want Congress to act so SCOTUS doesn't have to, but then they invalidate Congressional laws. What they want is nothing done.
June 24, 20223 yr 5 minutes ago, Dave Moss said: You don’t live here! I’m about to do so again for half of the year, I vote, and I pay taxes. Drop the tax requirement and we can talk. Otherwise STFU.
Create an account or sign in to comment