Jump to content

Featured Replies

48 minutes ago, FranklinFldEBUpper said:

DEFENSIVE LINE (9): The LOCKS are obvious: Brandon Graham, Josh Sweat, Derek Barnett, Fletcher Cox, Javon Hargrave, Jordan Davis, and Milton Williams. It feels like Tarron Jackson will probably be the fourth defensive end (if you consider Williams a tackle, which I do). My ninth guy is Marlon Tuipulotu, but not really with any conviction. I thought he was terrible in the preseason last year, yet the Eagles kept him on the roster all year long. I believe they thought he was injured and would be healthy a year later. Well, it's now a year later, so let's see what he has. Overall, I'm not convinced this line is as deep as it should be. Granted that Ryan Kerrigan was terrible last year, but going into the season, the thought was that he would be someone useful. And they kept Jackson as the fifth guy. A year later (now), and Jackson is the fourth end and it's the same other guys, including an old timer who's coming off a significant injury. And I'm not sure Jackson is anything special. To me, this position is kinda vulnerable. Of course by the same token, the defensive tackle position figures to be a lot stronger. And there's always Haason Reddick to consider, though I'll list him as a linebacker. But he'll put his hand on the ground from time to time and rush the passer. Defensive end has to be a prime draft need next spring.

LINEBACKER (7): I'd like to go seven deep here given the investment they made in the offseason to upgrade the unit. The LOCKS would be Haason Reddick, T.J. Edwards, Kyzir White, and Nakobe Dean. I'm not really a big fan of Shaun Bradley but he's probably the backup middle linebacker (if you count Dean as a swing guy). Davion Taylor probably makes it as the sixth guy, but this is the year he has to prove it. I'm tired of waiting on him. The seventh spot will come down to a battle of late round draft picks Patrick Johnson (last year) and Kyron Johnson (this year). My guess is that they'd prefer to keep the guy they drafted this year.

I think you can split these into DL, Outside rush, LBs

DL:  Cox, Hargrave, Davis, Williams, Tuipulotu - 4-3 DTs/3-4 DEs

OR:  Graham, Sweat, Riddick, Barnett, K Johnson, Jackson 4-3 DEs/3-4 OLBs

LB:  Edwards, White, Dean, Taylor, Bradley

I think Jackson will be the odd man out, and they'll go 5-5-5

  • Replies 23k
  • Views 1m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Westbrook#36
    Westbrook#36

    I'm sorry I brough such a depressing topic into the blog.  A little back story without too much detail. I met my friend 12 years ago during an AF commissioning program. He was on top of the world

  • Texas Eagle
    Texas Eagle

    Just welcomed the newest Eagles fan into the world

  • VaBeach_Eagle
    VaBeach_Eagle

    We (the EMB) currently sit at just over 940,000 posts. We're on pace for about 40,000 posts for the month of May. So it's looking like we'll break 1,000,000 posts within the first couple of weeks of J

Posted Images

1 hour ago, Saltpeter said:

I know this is lazy analysis, but I absolutely hate that the projected top 2 QBs next year are from Bama and Ohio State.

We'll probably be getting the 3rd QB off the board anyway

8 hours ago, ManuManu said:

I’d be stunned if a similar level of performance earned Hurts an extension. I think the Eagles are mostly content with Hurts at the moment based mostly on price point and saving up resources for a QB next year.

Yup. I get the fear, but nothing in Howie's history suggests he'll do this at QB. He's constantly looking for upgrades at QB #1 and QB #2.

Howie wanted to trade for Wilson and flipped 2022 picks for 2023 picks. He knows.

9 hours ago, downundermike said:

What ?? 
 

Jets official site disagrees with you, and I don’t even see a Neal on the Jets roster, and the only Thomas’ they have on the roster play defense.

 

7398E72E-9492-452D-B067-5A12DA37DD1D.jpeg

5913E443-A6C7-43AF-A07F-DA640D27A120.jpeg

466A908A-7683-46F0-9CF0-10E68B6E4710.jpeg

Oops. I was thinking Giants. All I saw was "Get Dillard on the next plane to NY." 

Sometimes I forget that the Jets are even in the NFL.

10 hours ago, Iggles_Phan said:

If he actually plays, that is.

Important word there.   But... 

The many responses to me are right.  He likely won't play.  Really, there's no reason when it appears that the position is his with a big bow on it signed "To Jalen, With much love, Howie."

 

9 hours ago, FranklinFldEBUpper said:

I realize it is kind of frowned on to make a post here that doesn't disparage the team's starting quarterback or insult another poster, but I figure I'll give it a shot and dip a toe in the water regarding the construction of the Eagles 53 man roster. My premise at the moment is that the Eagles will use more roster spots on defensive players than they will on offense simply because they have more depth there. With three roster spots already accounted for with the longsnapper, kicker, and punter, that leaves fifty to use for the offensive and defensive players. The general rule of thumb is to go with 25 for both offense and defense. But I think it'll be at least 26-24 for defense, and perhaps 27-23. Here are my position-by-position thoughts on how I see the roster shaking out. And bear in mind that I'm operating under the premise that there will be same freedom of movement regarding the practice squad as there has been the past couple of years. By that, I mean that teams will be able to activate two guys off the practice squad on any given week, so long as they don't activate a player more than two times. Here goes:

QUARTERBACK (2): There should be two LOCKS. Jalen Hurts and Gardner Minshew. If they go for a third on the 53, it will probably only be as a result of either Reid Sinnett or Carson Strong really impressing in the preseason games. Since Sinnett has done so in the past -- last year with the Dolphins when he was a shining star in the preseason -- I'd make him the favorite. But even so, I'm not sure. For now, I'll stick with two and see how the rest of the lineup shakes out.

RUNNING BACK (3): I think this is a position where the Eagles will carry at least four guys that they intend to utilize, but would prefer the fourth to be someone who clears waivers, makes it to their practice squad, and can be elevated as needed. There's also the distinct possibility of Jordan Howard being signed at some point. I almost think that's inevitable, truth be told. But for now, the three LOCKS would be Miles Sanders, Kenneth Gainwell, and Boston Scott. I imagine that Jason Huntley would be the fourth guy. For now, I'll stick with the three.

WIDE RECEIVERS (5): AJ Brown, DeVonta Smith, and Quez Watkins would be the three LOCKS. Jalen Reagor will probably be the fourth, but there is the chance he could be traded. I kinda don't think so though. The fifth spot would probably come down to Zach Paschal, Greg Ward, John Hightower, or Britain Covey. From what I've heard, Covey has been a pleasant surprise in camp, so I'd give that fifth spot to him. I'd like to see him in the preseason games to get a better feel. Let's leave it five for now. Ward is definitely good enough to play somewhere, so if a team were willing to give us a sixth or seventh round pick, I'd probably bite. Paschal is a Sirianni favorite, so he might be a contender too. Hightower is probably on the outside looking in.

TIGHT END (2): This is where it gets tricky as far as roster construction is concerned. Obviously Dallas Goedert is a LOCK. I really don't think they want to risk losing Grant Calcaterra on waivers like they did when they tried to get cute with sliding defensive end Casey Toohill on the waiver wire only to see him get snagged by Washington. Jack Stoll would be the third tight end, and I'm pretty sure they'd like to keep him. But for now, I'm putting him on waivers, hoping he clears, and then putting him on the practice squad and then activating him for the opener. If need be, they can then put Calcaterra on IR and then put Stoll on the 53. But for now, I'm just going with two.

OFFENSIVE LINE (10): This is almost always a position where the Eagles go heavy. They invest a lot of draft capital at this position and like to keep their guys. Generally speaking, the Eagles eleventh best offensive lineman is better than another team's ninth lineman. Anyway, there are seven LOCKS: Jordan Mailata, Landon Dickerson, Jason Kelce, Isaac Seumalo, Lane Johnson, Andre Dillard, and Cam Jurgens. There would be a remote chance that they would trade Dillard, but that seems unlikely to me. A team would have to blow them away with an offer, and if that were to happen, they'd have to cross their fingers and hope that Mailata and Johnson stay healthy all year. I doubt they'd be willing to risk that. So that's seven for sure. The other three spots probably come down to four guys. Jack Driscoll, Sua Opeta, Jack Anderson, and Le'Raven Clark. I guess it depends on the value they see for Anderson being able to play center. They already have two "backup" centers in Jurgens and Dickerson, so that could make Anderson vulnerable. I think Driscoll would be ahead of Clark as the fourth tackle. Opeta has been waived and unclaimed a couple times already so he could be the most likely to clear waivers. Not really sure what to make of the young guys. My guess is that they're battling for practice squad spots rather than active roster spots.

So that's 22 spots I'm using on offense...for now.

SPECIAL TEAMS (3): It's a guarantee that they'll use three roster spots here. Rick Lovato and Jake Elliott are LOCKS. Arryn Siposs is probably going to be the punter again, but I won't say he's a guarantee, as there is always the possibility that they'd claim someone on waivers. There is also the possibility that they don't even put a punter on the 53-man roster right away. They can play roster games for a couple of days and then sign someone a couple of days before the opener. But the Eagles don't tend to get cute like that. Regardless, it's three roster spots.

DEFENSIVE LINE (9): The LOCKS are obvious: Brandon Graham, Josh Sweat, Derek Barnett, Fletcher Cox, Javon Hargrave, Jordan Davis, and Milton Williams. It feels like Tarron Jackson will probably be the fourth defensive end (if you consider Williams a tackle, which I do). My ninth guy is Marlon Tuipulotu, but not really with any conviction. I thought he was terrible in the preseason last year, yet the Eagles kept him on the roster all year long. I believe they thought he was injured and would be healthy a year later. Well, it's now a year later, so let's see what he has. Overall, I'm not convinced this line is as deep as it should be. Granted that Ryan Kerrigan was terrible last year, but going into the season, the thought was that he would be someone useful. And they kept Jackson as the fifth guy. A year later (now), and Jackson is the fourth end and it's the same other guys, including an old timer who's coming off a significant injury. And I'm not sure Jackson is anything special. To me, this position is kinda vulnerable. Of course by the same token, the defensive tackle position figures to be a lot stronger. And there's always Haason Reddick to consider, though I'll list him as a linebacker. But he'll put his hand on the ground from time to time and rush the passer. Defensive end has to be a prime draft need next spring.

LINEBACKER (7): I'd like to go seven deep here given the investment they made in the offseason to upgrade the unit. The LOCKS would be Haason Reddick, T.J. Edwards, Kyzir White, and Nakobe Dean. I'm not really a big fan of Shaun Bradley but he's probably the backup middle linebacker (if you count Dean as a swing guy). Davion Taylor probably makes it as the sixth guy, but this is the year he has to prove it. I'm tired of waiting on him. The seventh spot will come down to a battle of late round draft picks Patrick Johnson (last year) and Kyron Johnson (this year). My guess is that they'd prefer to keep the guy they drafted this year. 

SECONDARY (11): With the way the roster is currently constructed, they just have to go heavy here again. The LOCKS are Darius Slay, James Bradberry, Avonte Maddox, Anthony Harris, and Marcus Epps. The third safety spot figures to come down to Jaquiski Tartt and K'Von Wallace. My guess is that they'll go with Tartt and cut bait with Wallace, who really hasn't done anything in two years. It wouldn't surprise me if the fourth safety ends up being Andre Chachere because he's good on special teams. The fourth corner will probably be Zech McPherson, though that's far from a sure thing. As for the rest, who the hell really knows? Even at this point, I don't know the difference between Tay Gowan, Kary Vincent, Josiah Scott, Mac McCain, Josh Jobe, Mario Goodrich, and Jimmy Moreland. But let's keep the three best of those guys and make it eleven. (These go to eleven!)

So that's 27 defensive guys to go along with the 22 offensive and 3 special teams guys. That gives me one extra guy. I guess for me it comes down to Paschal, Sinnett, and Stoll. Let's go with Stoll for now, so disregard everything I said earlier about trying to sneak him through waivers. But dangit, Sirianni supposedly loves him some Zach Paschal, so maybe they keep him, perhaps instead of Covey. Oh it's a conundrum. Anyway I'm going with Stoll as my 53rd guy.

Injuries between now and cutdown day would obviously change things.

I look forward to the coming weeks to see how this all plays out. Unfortunately I won't be able to attend the game against the Jets this Friday night so I'll be forced to watch it on television and be subjected to only getting to see what they want us to see. I'd much prefer being there and being able to watch what I want, when I want.

Good post. I’m thinking both Paschal and Stoll are kept and one of the LBs goes. 7 LBs is just too heavy for a devalued position. Unless there are some guys who may be viewed as ST aces, but I doubt it. 

12 hours ago, D-Shiznit said:

Get Dillard on the next plane to NY.

Fant is their LT.  Becton is their RT.  Are you sure they will want Dillard for RT?  

I have to hand it to the Bears. 

  • Their biggest FA signing failed a physical.
  • They didn't add real WR help to Justin Fields (apologies to Pringle)
  • They didn't address the OL with meaningful assets and it looks bare.
  • They have alienated arguably their best player: Roquan Smith

But hey, they'll have LOTS of 2023 cap space where they can overspend.

7 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

That’s the new way.  Negotiate in public.  Sad really.  

Or the Bears could offer him a reasonable contract.

3 minutes ago, RLC said:

Or the Bears could offer him a reasonable contract.

How do you know what they've offered? 

Roquan Smith and Jessie Bates trade AT THE SAME TIME lets gooooooo

3 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

How do you know what they've offered? 

That's pretty bad. De-escalators for that type of player never happens.

23 minutes ago, RLC said:

I have to hand it to the Bears. 

  • Their biggest FA signing failed a physical.
  • They didn't add real WR help to Justin Fields (apologies to Pringle)
  • They didn't address the OL with meaningful assets and it looks bare.
  • They have alienated arguably their best player: Roquan Smith

But hey, they'll have LOTS of 2023 cap space where they can overspend.

You don't get the #1 overall pick just by accident.  If it's not the Bears I can't imagine who it will be.

7 minutes ago, RLC said:

That's pretty bad. De-escalators for that type of player never happens.

You'd have to ask why the Bears would insist then on setting that precedent? Maybe there's something in his behaviour they're concerned with (de-escalators can be for off field stuff, like weight management, etc). If it's strictly performance related, shouldn't he be willing to bet on himself? 

Looking at LB salaries, the top guys are all outside rushers who pile up sack numbers. That's not Smith's game. And, as the years go by, LBs are continually de-valued. 

1 minute ago, Alphagrand said:

You don't get the #1 overall pick just by accident.  If it's not the Bears I can't imagine who it will be.

Seattle is up there. They have no Qb. Their oline stinks. And their defense isn’t good. It probably comes down to the bears or Seahawks. 

1 hour ago, E-A-G-L-E-S Eagles said:

The many responses to me are right.  He likely won't play.  Really, there's no reason when it appears that the position is his with a big bow on it signed "To Jalen, With much love, Howie."

 

1 hour ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

There is plenty of reason for him to play, he needs the reps.  Odd that Lowie doesn't understand that when it's plainly obvious.  Bull headed.  

Yup

5 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Seattle is up there. They have no Qb. Their oline stinks. And their defense isn’t good. It probably comes down to the bears or Seahawks. 

Right now I’d put the two NY teams under Seattle.

Seattle has some offensive weapons, Noah Fant, DK Metcalf, a deep backfield. And a QB who’s easily better than the two NY guys.

The Giants are a complete wasteland of talent, and the Jets don’t ever seem to be getting any better

Just now, Aerolithe_Lion said:

Right now I’d put the two NY teams under Seattle.

Seattle has some offensive weapons, Noah Fant, DK Metcalf, a deep backfield. And a QB who’s easily better than the two NY guys.

The Giants are a complete wasteland of talent, and the Jets don’t ever seem to be getting any better

Jets will surprise a bit this year I think. They've added some nice offensive pieces, and Wilson should be better. Tough-ish division, though I think the Patriots take a step back, and the Dolphins are a wild card in every sense. 

5 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

Jets will surprise a bit this year I think. They've added some nice offensive pieces, and Wilson should be better. Tough-ish division, though I think the Patriots take a step back, and the Dolphins are a wild card in every sense. 

Im a bit about Zach Wilson. He completed 55% of his passes at only 6.1 yards per attempt. When you’re checking down every play, that should improve your completion percentage.

Its scary how bad that stat is in 2021.

Furthermore, he led the league in yards sacked despite not being close to total sacks taken. The only way I can comprehend that is if he’s running backwards when he sees a free rusher… implying mindbogglingly bad decision making.

5 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Wait.  What Seattle QB is easily better than the two NY guys?  Drew Lock or Geno Smith?   Because Geno is leading the battle right now and he’s not easily better than anyone.  

I was talking about Lock… you think they’ll make Geno the starter?

 

8 minutes ago, Aerolithe_Lion said:

Right now I’d put the two NY teams under Seattle.

Seattle has some offensive weapons, Noah Fant, DK Metcalf, a deep backfield. And a QB who’s easily better than the two NY guys.

The Giants are a complete wasteland of talent, and the Jets don’t ever seem to be getting any better

The Giants have two really good young tackles and a pretty good defense. Would be better with Bradberry.😜

1 minute ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Currently he’s leading the battle.  So if Lock isn’t good enough to beat out Geno Smith, then he’s not easily better than anyone.  

I think they should give Lock a shot   Because I think Smith is that bad.   But neither of them is head and tails over what NYJ or NYG has   

https://www.espn.com/blog/seattle-seahawks/post/_/id/36100/geno-smith-still-leading-seattle-seahawks-qb-battle-but-is-drew-lock-gaining-ground

Local radio guys are saying that Lock will be the starter

19 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

You'd have to ask why the Bears would insist then on setting that precedent? Maybe there's something in his behaviour they're concerned with (de-escalators can be for off field stuff, like weight management, etc). If it's strictly performance related, shouldn't he be willing to bet on himself? 

Looking at LB salaries, the top guys are all outside rushers who pile up sack numbers. That's not Smith's game. And, as the years go by, LBs are continually de-valued. 

It still doesn't happen to players at that level. Look at the backlash the Cards took from the Murray contract.

I agree in principle that paying LBs is bad, but Roquan Smith is an actual 3rd down player and the Bears have no one else they need to extend except for maybe Jaylon Johnson. And if you really don't want to extend Roquan, complete the tank and trade him. Keeping him for this year, to let him walk for a comp pick, is just dumb.

1 minute ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Currently he’s leading the battle.  So if Lock isn’t good enough to beat out Geno Smith, then he’s not easily better than anyone.  

I think they should give Lock a shot   Because I think Smith is that bad.   But neither of them is head and tails over what NYJ or NYG has   

https://www.espn.com/blog/seattle-seahawks/post/_/id/36100/geno-smith-still-leading-seattle-seahawks-qb-battle-but-is-drew-lock-gaining-ground

Even if Geno, yes he’s clearly better than the other two. Wilson had one of the worst rookie seasons we’ve seen in a long long time, and Daniel Jones is the worst veteran starter in the National Footbal League.

Daniel Jones is an immobile QB who has 22 TD passes in his last 25 games. That’s… statistically impossible