1 minute ago, mattwill said:

Regarding the possibility of a Reagor for Hunt trade.  Would you be willing to include Gainwell with Reagor?

For me, that would mean a one-year rental in exchange for those two players.  I would not extend Hunt, but rather look to agree with him that playing behind the Eagles O-Line would be an ideal situation for him to put up great numbers in a contract year.

No.

 

4 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

He needs reps.  Real reps, where he has to learn how to protect himself, unlike in practice where he gets 'sacked', and then throws the ball anyway for a 'TD'.   He's not a finished product, why are we protecting him like he can't get better from getting more live reps.

He did that against the Jets and took a cheap shot. Hurts did what he's supposed to (get out of bounds when he's a runner).

Also, most teams are doing this. It's more common than uncommon in the league.

10 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Regarding the possibility of a Reagor for Hunt trade.  Would you be willing to include Gainwell with Reagor?

For me, that would mean a one-year rental in exchange for those two players.  I would not extend Hunt, but rather look to agree with him that playing behind the Eagles O-Line would be an ideal situation for him to put up great numbers in a contract year.

Nope

19 minutes ago, Next_Up said:

Its a colloquialism, not an incantation

High marks for spellcheck...

11 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Regarding the possibility of a Reagor for Hunt trade.  Would you be willing to include Gainwell with Reagor?

For me, that would mean a one-year rental in exchange for those two players.  I would not extend Hunt, but rather look to agree with him that playing behind the Eagles O-Line would be an ideal situation for him to put up great numbers in a contract year.

Hunt is a scumbag and I like Gainwell's potential as a receiving RB so it's an easy "No" for me.

13 minutes ago, RLC said:

He did that against the Jets and took a cheap shot. Hurts did what he's supposed to (get out of bounds when he's a runner).

Also, most teams are doing this. It's more common than uncommon in the league.

False.

You get out of bounds as a runner when you are getting positive yardage, it would have been credited as a sack if not for the penalty.  Should have thrown it away.

19 minutes ago, Alphagrand said:

But, has he supplanted Minshew as the best player on the team??

Haha never said those words. Some other poster proposed that...

Just now, downundermike said:

False.

You get out of bounds as a runner when you are getting positive yardage, it would have been credited as a sack if not for the penalty.  Should have thrown it away.

The number was zero yards. That's the line of scrimmage. Throw away or run is the same the result.

2 minutes ago, RLC said:

The number was zero yards. That's the line of scrimmage. Throw away or run is the same the result.

If he throws it away, there is no doubt and he doesn't get hit.

49 minutes ago, Alphagrand said:

In the twitter feed someone said the first 3 questions were from Bo Wulf.

Another moron.  I feel for Zach Berman being saddled with him.   

43 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

I mentioned safety over Hunt earlier

 

I watched their show earlier. Kracz said he's "hearing some rumblings" that Reagor could be traded by the end of the month. He didn't mention any names so it sounds more like his personal speculation he'll be traded for a safety and not some other position.

 

Not surprised those 3 questions were from Bo. Checked in on their camp report yesterday. He started off forcing Zach to talk about Watson. I skipped up half an hour and it was still going on. Zach tried to steer him away and he kept going back to it. X'd it out and didn't go back. Never passes up a chance to virtue signal. I rarely listen to BwF anymore, but I do like Zach a lot, so I'll check in from time to time, but almost every time I do it's the virtue signal hour from Bo.

Btw, does anyone find it ironic that the people most outward about their disgust for Watson's actions(like everyone would assume you were pro sexual predation if you didn't speak up about it on social media) are the same people who won't be able to give you the answer to what a woman is? Everyone has the utmost love and respect for women as long as it fits their agenda. Try to defend women's rights when dudes compete against them in competitive sports or allowing men who've been convicted of sexual assault into women's prisons and suddenly you won't find a lot of defense for women from these people.

1 hour ago, Doc S. said:

Thank you for that research. Enjoy your posts, in depth and well organized, "Pillar" ? ..lol

Straight poop and nothing but the poop...easy to navigate...

actually didn’t know if you were being sarcastic or not.  If not then ignore the gif 

1 hour ago, mattwill said:

Regarding the possibility of a Reagor for Hunt trade.  Would you be willing to include Gainwell with Reagor?

For me, that would mean a one-year rental in exchange for those two players.  I would not extend Hunt, but rather look to agree with him that playing behind the Eagles O-Line would be an ideal situation for him to put up great numbers in a contract year.

Not a chance 

21 hours ago, Doc S. said:

Well you are 106 years old, surprised?

This season is about to kick off.

Stations for getting underway... Close all watertight bulkheads, man the mooring lines fore and aft, prepare to make turns for maneuvering speed, All hands to Battle Stations, make ready all weapons systems, Man the aft torpedo room, Make weapons ready for a potential rear shot, set your depth for  65 ft, raise periscope, prepare to engage the the enemy....

This campaign should be fun to watch.

I bet you wet the bed into your teens

52 minutes ago, downundermike said:

If he throws it away, there is no doubt and he doesn't get hit.

QBs get hit after throwing it too.

3 minutes ago, RLC said:

QBs get hit after throwing it too.

1 hour ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Can't really tell anything from Twitter "reports" of a scripted joint practice.  So we just assume they won and move on.  

And, from the sound of it, we won't see the starters in game action on Sunday.  Yay.

Who cares about watching the starters go through the motions in pre-season?

I'm more interested in the players I won't see again (other than maybe special teams) unless there's a serious injury.

43 minutes ago, austinfan said:

Who cares about watching the starters go through the motions in pre-season?

I'm more interested in the players I won't see again (other than maybe special teams) unless there's a serious injury.

Me. Those parlays don’t just hit themselves. 

45 minutes ago, austinfan said:

Who cares about watching the starters go through the motions in pre-season?

I'm more interested in the players I won't see again (other than maybe special teams) unless there's a serious injury.

it's not about watching them, it's about the starters working off rust, getting LIVE IN GAME ACTION, that you can't replicate in a controlled practice as much as you want to tell yourself they can.  It just doesn't happen.

If they are just going through the motions then that tells me more about the player over anything else.  

It's just OTA's, they don't do much there anyway.  They have nothing to lose by skipping them

It's just a mini camp, they don't do much there anyway.  They have nothing to lose not having any.

It's just a pre-season game, they just go through the motions.  They have nothing to lose by not playing their starters at all.

 

 

1 hour ago, Sack that QB said:

Not surprised those 3 questions were from Bo. Checked in on their camp report yesterday. He started off forcing Zach to talk about Watson. I skipped up half an hour and it was still going on. Zach tried to steer him away and he kept going back to it. X'd it out and didn't go back. Never passes up a chance to virtue signal. I rarely listen to BwF anymore, but I do like Zach a lot, so I'll check in from time to time, but almost every time I do it's the virtue signal hour from Bo.

Btw, does anyone find it ironic that the people most outward about their disgust for Watson's actions(like everyone would assume you were pro sexual predation if you didn't speak up about it on social media) are the same people who won't be able to give you the answer to what a woman is? Everyone has the utmost love and respect for women as long as it fits their agenda. Try to defend women's rights when dudes compete against them in competitive sports or allowing men who've been convicted of sexual assault into women's prisons and suddenly you won't find a lot of defense for women from these people.

It’s funny that you think sexual assault of 22 women is even remotely the same as these 2 things. Things that most women actually don’t care about. But go on "defending womens rights”

1 hour ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

actually didn’t know if you were being sarcastic or not.  If not then ignore the gif 

No, not sarcastic at all. Appreciate your attention to detail and your research. Thanks!

2 minutes ago, wtfcares said:

It’s funny that you think sexual assault of 22 women is even remotely the same as these 2 things. Things that most women actually don’t care about. But go on "defending womens rights”

Doesn't have to be the same. You either care about protecting women and their rights in society or you don't. If you pick and choose only select aspects of that in which you care about, then you don't actually care as much as you're letting on.

People who go on social media tangents do it performatively the far majority of the time. It's to bring attention to one's self and showing they're "on the right team" more than actually caring about these issues.

15 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

it's not about watching them, it's about the starters working off rust, getting LIVE IN GAME ACTION, that you can't replicate in a controlled practice as much as you want to tell yourself they can.  It just doesn't happen.

If they are just going through the motions then that tells me more about the player over anything else.  

It's just OTA's, they don't do much there anyway.  They have nothing to lose by skipping them

It's just a mini camp, they don't do much there anyway.  They have nothing to lose not having any.

It's just a pre-season game, they just go through the motions.  They have nothing to lose by not playing their starters at all.

If you're betting on pre-season games, get help.

Starters don't shake the rust off by playing a quarter or half in a pre-season game three weeks before the first real game.

Teams don't even use a big chunk of their offense and defensive schemes in pre-season games, because they don't want to give film to their first few opponents.

The advantage of scrimmages is you play another team but the rest of the league doesn't get to watch.

2 hours ago, Doc S. said:

Thank you for that research. Enjoy your posts, in depth and well organized, "Pillar" ? ..lol

Straight poop and nothing but the poop...easy to navigate...

Thanks for stopping by. Really added some value here.