Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 hours ago, downundermike said:

It’s a movie, not a documentary 

spacer.png

  • Replies 23k
  • Views 1m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Westbrook#36
    Westbrook#36

    I'm sorry I brough such a depressing topic into the blog.  A little back story without too much detail. I met my friend 12 years ago during an AF commissioning program. He was on top of the world

  • Texas Eagle
    Texas Eagle

    Just welcomed the newest Eagles fan into the world

  • VaBeach_Eagle
    VaBeach_Eagle

    We (the EMB) currently sit at just over 940,000 posts. We're on pace for about 40,000 posts for the month of May. So it's looking like we'll break 1,000,000 posts within the first couple of weeks of J

Posted Images

9 hours ago, olsilverhair said:

hey slutbooger, who started the now locked thread about the sexual orientation of the starting qb

Think it was your maple syrup loving inbred cousin Torontoeagle 

5 hours ago, HazletonEagle said:

At what point do we just make it illegal to go to Miami? 

We certainly can’t start blaming people for their lives an behavior 

8 hours ago, jsb235 said:

So unless something is 100 percent historically accurate, it shouldn't be portrayed in a movie or tv show? Seems like a really difficult standard to meet. For example, women's pro baseball was essentially softball for most of its existence, do we pull our hair out about that? 

If we have a show about the military, and 99 percent of the time was spent training, should we demand it reflect that reality? 

Yeah. We should make a story about womens basketball where all the players are 90 year old white men. 

1 hour ago, dawkdaballhawk said:

Yeah. We should make a story about womens basketball where all the players are 90 year old white men. 

womens basketball, I'd rather watch paint dry

16 hours ago, BigEFly said:

I am not touting Taylor as better than Dean, I said they are both gambles and they are.  Dean is short and light, not as big as Taylor and slower.  If he can’t deal with a second level block by an OL by himself, that’s an issue. Davis isn’t a 100% rep guy and Milt Williams is a smaller DT. Do you really think Marlon T or Marvin Wilson are going to keep Dean clean from all second level or TE blocks?  He disappointed in the Cleveland game.  He has actually shown up as a disappointment on some of the Beats’ evaluations.  Many refer to a quiet TC.  Well, he is a rookie so that is to be expected to a degree but he is still learning NFL football.  So, yeah, I think they are still gambles at this point.  I will say this, Dean’s arrow is probably pointing up more than Taylor’s at this point. 

I'll take a gamble on an intelligent, fast, form tackling football player from a big time program, over a guy who never played before, but has all the measurables when it comes to a 3rd round pick.  

The knock on Dean is size and durability.  The knock on Taylor is that he's constantly lost.  

 

And no, I don't expect Milton Williams to keep him clean.  I expect Williams to play the 4i.  I am talking about the 0 technique and Davis.  I think that the fact that they went with him, and signed another space eater DT as a UDFA might indicate that that's the blueprint moving forward.   Smaller guys like Zach Thomas and Sam Mills can thrive if they are kept clean.  Dean was kept clean at UGA.  Granted that was a stacked DL, but once upon a time, the Eagles prioritized having a stacked DL too.

29 minutes ago, olsilverhair said:

womens basketball, I'd rather watch paint dry

Well you don’t have the option considering your old lady smashed the tv when she threw a bottle of jack at you and missed. 

9 hours ago, jsb235 said:

Knew a guy whose dad was a famous ww2 general who spent his senior years bitterly complaining about how integrating the military was a disaster and how blacks were inferior and unfit to be soldiers. 

So you would be happier showing that? 

Is this the dad of the guy you know?

Emancipation Proclamation GIFs - Get the best GIF on GIPHY

18 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

but isnt that everything in life? Look at the mob movies, all of the drug movies, etc. 

Get your Pickett jersey yet? 

16 hours ago, justrelax said:

Well, Lee had lost Jeb  Stuart at Yellow Tavern. He needed a cavalry officer (LT).

P.S. I like Meade quite a lot, despite some egregious errors. McDowell, well, no. At Chancellorsville, when Hooker lost his nerve and ordered a retreat, Meade argued strenuously to stay and fight.

I too like Meade, he was a good general, and was never truly replaced as Commander of the Army of the Potomac.  Grant was placed above him, kept him on at that position, but Grant camped with the Army of the Potomac, so he was able to have a more tight control than if he commanded the overall operations from Washington.

I offer McDowell, as Lee also lost Jackson at Chancellorsville, initially thought to be only an amputation (with expected return to duty), but developed pneumonia.  So, in the trade, Lee might only be looking for a short term replacement while Jackson recoups, similar to Dallas possibly thinking that Smith can return at some point.  Smith only has one year left on his deal though, so they can move on from him fairly cheaply on the cap though, so perhaps they will.  Of course, the Eagles had that luxury with Peters as well when he reached the end, but they just kept bringing him back.  We'll see.

8 hours ago, HazletonEagle said:

At what point do we just make it illegal to go to Miami? 

Not until they remove the team they just placed in LV from there.  These guys need to get smarter about their conduct, but sadly, many of these guys have too much money too soon and they do stupid and irresponsible things with it.  It is truly tragic.  I just hope that no more players take others' lives with them as they self-destruct.  That's the greater tragedy.

12 hours ago, mattwill said:

As one of the people who "would be fine” I understand the perspective stated. However, I will say the Blog’s definition of politics is rather broad.  A lot of what incites the "TAKE IT…” response isn’t politics but rather sociology and/or history. 

Well some people are sensitive snowflake millennials that need safe places and words are triggering to them.  

13 hours ago, hputenis said:

Underperform, under impress in camp, and publicly demand a trade.  Sounds consistent with today’s youth. 

Another sensitive millennial.  

11 hours ago, bpac55 said:

I'm talking Sam Rayburn, Paul Grasmanis guys.

Derek Landri, Hollis Thomas who was undrafted 

30 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

No

I bought a george pickens instead

That's a better choice. It's going to be a sad day for Stiller fans when they have to trade him because he calls Pickett the white Dak Prescott.  

15 hours ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Hurts missed his chance to slam his helmet into Tua's cranium for taking his job

He didn't want to be embarrassed by his innaccuracy and lack of arm strength.  

Hypothetical situation in next year's draft...let's say we make the playoffs but exit first round, again. So our pick is around 20.

Let's also say the Saints give us a top 5 pick.

With that top 5 pick, we end up with the QB we want (this is hypothetical, remember) without having to move up at all.

With the 20th pick...if he's there, would you consider taking Bijan? I know, generally don't take RBs in the first....but, getting that QB early without using additional assets would open up that 20th pick to BPA basically. 

3 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

Hypothetical situation in next year's draft...let's say we make the playoffs but exit first round, again. So our pick is around 20.

Let's also say the Saints give us a top 5 pick.

With that top 5 pick, we end up with the QB we want (this is hypothetical, remember) without having to move up at all.

With the 20th pick...if he's there, would you consider taking Bijan? I know, generally don't take RBs in the first....but, getting that QB early without using additional assets would open up that 20th pick to BPA basically. 

Nope, 20 is to high for a RB.

I think it's more likely they continue to build the lines, specifically DLine.

Not sure who the best DE DT prospects are but I'd think they'd take DL OL DB WR TE in the first before taking a RB.

Just now, Utebird said:

Nope, 20 is to high for a RB.

I think it's more likely they continue to build the lines, specifically DLine.

Not sure who the best DE DT prospects are but I'd think they'd take DL OL DB WR TE in the first before taking a RB.

Going WR or TE over RB next year would be insanity. 

I can see arguments for DL/OL/DB. 

Just now, TorontoEagle said:

Going WR or TE over RB next year would be insanity. 

I can see arguments for DL/OL/DB. 

yeah I agree seeing as they've spent a ton of draft capital on WR plus AJs big contract but WR is valued way higher than RB in today's game, and well how does insanely stupid things on draft day.

But yeah if not QB I'd say DL OL DB

1 minute ago, Utebird said:

yeah I agree seeing as they've spent a ton of draft capital on WR plus AJs big contract but WR is valued way higher than RB in today's game, and well how does insanely stupid things on draft day.

But yeah if not QB I'd say DL OL DB

Well I addressed the QB question in the first part of my hypothetical. 

I think it's likely we go OL/DL with our 2nd pick. I'd be shocked if we went DB even. 

I'd still take Bijan over all of them at 20, in my scenario. Dude's gonna be a monster. 

15 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

Well I addressed the QB question in the first part of my hypothetical. 

I think it's likely we go OL/DL with our 2nd pick. I'd be shocked if we went DB even. 

I'd still take Bijan over all of them at 20, in my scenario. Dude's gonna be a monster. 

I don't know much about him I'll go check out some highlights.

It's just difficult to justify a 1st on any RB.

Eagles are pretty thin at corner, not that they don't have bodies there they have like 400 corners on the roster but slay is getting up there who knows  if bradberry is here past this year and he's not that young either, Maddox is just a nickel , Zech who knows 

I'd be ok with a first spent on a corner or even a safety, though Howie will never use a 1st on a safety 

11 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

Going WR or TE over RB next year would be insanity. 

I can see arguments for DL/OL/DB. 

You have to picture the Eagles DL in 2023 without Brandon Graham and Fletcher Cox, because both will be gone.  DL will be a high priority, as well as DB as you mentioned.

Just now, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Any skill position next year would be insanity.  With RB being the most insane.  It’s not gonna happen. DE, DB, DE, DB maybe even OT.  

Howie Roseman:

Hold my beer

2 hours ago, olsilverhair said:

womens basketball, I'd rather watch paint dry

It doesn't help their cause when the woman currently in a Russian prison has a voice like Michael Clarke Duncan

1 minute ago, TorontoEagle said:

Howie Roseman:

Hold my beer

Bijan kind of reminds me of Jamal Charles who had similar speed same college jersey ...