Jump to content

Top Gun: Maverick


The_Omega
 Share

Recommended Posts

I feel the need....

 

Quote

 

Review: Tom Cruise Brings the Excitement of a Throwback Studio Hit in "Top Gun Maverick”

by Roger Friedman - May 12, 2022 9:00 am

 

There’s no question that "Top Gun: Maverick” is an exciting throwback of a hit. For some it’s the sequel they’ve been waiting for since the original film in 1986. It’s actually much better than the original, so that’s the good news.

"Maverick” picks up 35 years after we last saw Tom Cruise as ace flyer Pete Mitchell. His pal, Goose, played by Anthony Edwards, of course, is dead. His other pal, "Iceman,” in the form of Val Kilmer, is now the Admiral who’s been protecting Maverick all these years when other, less tolerant Navy brass (Jon Hamm, Ed Harris) would like to kick him to the curb.

But now they need Maverick to train some young bucks for a new mission: an provoked attack on an unnamed country’s cache of weapons. We never learn what country it is, and you must suspend disbelief here. If this happened in real life, the US would be starting World War III. But this is a fantasy where logic doesn’t matter as much guts and heroism. For a couple of hours, why not?

The new kids are either literal or poetic descendants of the old ones. Goose’s son, "Rooster,” has a chip on his shoulder and is ready to fight Maverick. That’s Miles Teller, giving it his all. Glen Powell is the wide grinning cocky "Hangman,” who thinks he’s the best flyer ever and has persuaded others to believe it, too.

In the original movie, Cruise had a romance with Charlie, played by Kelly McGillis. There’s no mention of what happened to her, or why Maverick has never settled down, married, had a kid, or what his life has been like. He returns to his old base to find the gorgeous Jennifer Connelly playing a part — Penny — who was mentioned in the first movie but never seen. She’s supposed to be an old girlfriend. She’s a single mom who runs the base bar, and in short order you know they will hook up.

Most everything is as it seems in "Maverick,” which is comforting right now. Some names and faces may have changed, but the idea is the same for the first 90 minutes. Everyone’s attractive the dialogue is corny, and everything looks good on paper.

I recommend you take your bathroom break before the last half hour because that’s when this well oiled, 80s kind of studio movie gets interesting. There are two twists that make even the stunning aerial acts we’ve seen along the way jump several feet. Here is where "Maverick” pulls a fast one or two, and you will actually be stirred out of a reverie into fascination. It’s a cool plot trick from writers Ehren Kruger and Eric Warren Singer (with help from Cruise’s "Mission Impossible” partner, Christopher McQuarrie).

A lot has happened since "Maverick” wrapped three years ago. It was supposed to be released two years ago but Paramount wanted to stream it day and date with its theatrical release because of COVID. Cruise said no, which caused a toppling of the studio hierarchy. Frankly, the flying sequences and cinematography must be seen in theaters, preferably IMAX. They are pulse racing. They are helped, too, by Harold Faltermayer’s score, with help from Hans Zimmer, and of course Lady Gaga’s song.

There are many nods to the past. Val Kilmer, whose speaking voice has been ravaged by cancer, has an incredibly moving scene with Cruise. His story, and Edwards’ (who is not seen), are woven into the new plot very cleverly. We see flashbacks of Meg Ryan as Goose’s late mother. At its conclusion the movie is 

dedicated to late director Tony Scott. (The new director, Joseph Kosinski,, no matter how much revising was done, gets kudos for keeping to the blueprint he was given.)

If "Top Gun Maverick” doesn’t bring people back to theaters in droves, then nothing will. It’s got everything: a hero played by a movie star, new young heroes who are very appealing, an old fashioned nod to the sense that America can lick any foreign problem with ingenuity and pluck, and a beautiful woman to come home to. Tom Cruise may have a strange persona life (yes, we know, we know) but he and producer Jerry Bruckheimer get an A plus for showing that the last 35 years of movie myth-making weren’t for naught.

"Top Gun Maverick” plays the Cannes Film Festival next week. The review embargo lifted this morning, two weeks before the US opening. You know Paramount knows it has a massive hit to let the reviews out now. Well played.

 

 

giphy.gif?cid=790b76115f2c4af6c70235b58d

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evidently they filmed this is a special way that some theaters have seats that move and shake along with the movie and is some new fangled digital 8k 3D.  Sounds like an epic experience for this type of movie. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guess I should at least post the trailer even though everyone's probably already seen it

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Godfather said:

Gay!

if this is gay i don't wanna be straight! 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Godfather said:

Gay!

You wanna hear ghey? I started Navy boot camp in late 1989 (no, that's not the ghey part). Top Gun was only a few years old at that time so it was still a big deal. Anyway, on more than one occasion, guys broke out in song with You've Lost that Loving Feeling. In the shower. The communal shower. That really happened.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

You wanna hear ghey? I started Navy boot camp in late 1989 (no, that's not the ghey part). Top Gun was only a few years old at that time so it was still a big deal. Anyway, on more than one occasion, guys broke out in song with You've Lost that Loving Feeling. In the shower. The communal shower. That really happened.

thank you for your getting serviced! 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going opening night to see it. I've been waiting 2 years 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Mat said:

I'm going opening night to see it. I've been waiting 2 years 

This is the way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Meg Ryan or Kelly McGillis.

Sorry, not interested.

:whistle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dave Moss said:

No Meg Ryan or Kelly McGillis.

Sorry, not interested.

:whistle:
 

Speaking of not interested 

image.jpeg.7ab88359756e5541c4a99ae4da05b035.jpeg
 

image.jpeg.4eab9c9bb7ce7ac7026d26c256304623.jpeg
 

I’ve lost that loving feeling.

  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The_Omega said:

 

image.jpeg.7ab88359756e5541c4a99ae4da05b035.jpeg
 

image.jpeg.4eab9c9bb7ce7ac7026d26c256304623.jpeg
 


:drool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Dave Moss said:

No Meg Ryan or Kelly McGillis.

Sorry, not interested.

:whistle:

Jennifer Connelly is definitely an upgrade:

 

118466-origin_1.jpg

jennifer-connelly-in-people-top-gun-special-edition-may-2022-1.jpg

Screenshot_20220515-172005_Google.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

97% on Rotten Tomatoes after 90 reviews. 

All say it is better than the original and some are even saying it deserves consideration for one of the best Tom Cruise movies of all time 

😲

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless the director was French or Korean and its plot involved some kind of repression, it ain't sniffing an Oscar for best picture 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/12/2022 at 10:03 PM, Godfather said:

Gay!

 

On 5/13/2022 at 11:23 AM, Agent23 said:

if this is gay i don't wanna be straight! 

f88f8ac6-dd62-4b25-8f40-6cade2176bd2_tex

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, mikemack8 said:

Unless the director was French or Korean and its plot involved some kind of repression, it ain't sniffing an Oscar for best picture 

Yeah top gun has zero chance at an oscar no matter how good it is, I agree with President Bartlett only way watching  oscars would be good

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have AMC A-List which gets me 3 included movies weekly, any format. Yet I am so tempted to pay the $23 for the A-List-excluded early access that is this upcoming Tuesday night :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going to see this in a Dolby cinema theater 

Those jet engines should sound very nice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

Going to see this in a Dolby cinema theater 

Those jet engines should sound very nice

i have IMAX and Dolby booked, but now I am seeing that Tuesday (if I pay for early access) is during Warriors game 4, and Thursday (which is "free" with my A-List) is during Warriors game 5... so now I further root for a 4-game sweep! I think my current tickets are Thursday and Friday night. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...