Lamar at 5 is union member agenda or it calls for drug testing.

Jalen to receive an award on Wednesday next week.

22 hours ago, downundermike said:

He did not play well against the Saints, but the coaches also did not coach well that day.

He did more than enough to beat the Cowboys in Dallas, the defense decided to ish the bad that day.

Obviously when a player has done as much for the team as Minshew has this season, he gets the benefit of the doubt.

22 hours ago, PoconoDon said:

For many Jalen was in a prove-it year.

Well, He Proved it!

How are you feeling about this game Don? Should the Eagles stay the course?

3 hours ago, Thrive said:

How are you feeling about this game Don? Should the Eagles stay the course?

Quite good and Always. 

On 2/3/2023 at 3:45 PM, jsb235 said:

He has four starts for us in two years and has thrown for 1,100 yards, 7 tds and a 92.8 rating. I am not sure how out of whack the offense was, especially since we scored at will against the Cowboys a week earlier. 

Vs Dallas, the scoring wasn't the problem. Turnovers were the problem. We had four, and that was the only way reason we didn't stomp Dallas into the dust

16 hours ago, kiwinavega said:

Vs Dallas, the scoring wasn't the problem. Turnovers were the problem. We had four, and that was the only way reason we didn't stomp Dallas into the dust

You are pushing it. Dallas was fighting tooth and nail in that game. Yes we are a better team, and we probably would have beat them if not for some crazy errors..but this was not even remotely like the Giants game, where we just dominated the Giants into submission by the halftime.

Well, maybe. But four turnovers is always going to be hard to overcome.

 

And Their Off to Arizona. Lets bring it back home to Philly.  Before this season, the Eagles haven't won in Arizona for 21 years.  They beat the Cardinals in Week 5 to break that.    Now they will have to do it twice.   The Eagles were 7-1 on the Road this year (7-0 when Jalen Starts).   Technically they are the "Home" team this Super Bowl but I still view it as a Road game.  

10 hours ago, KINGnabb said:

Before this season, the Eagles haven't won in Arizona for 21 years.  They beat the Cardinals in Week 5 to break that.    Now they will have to do it twice.  

On a missed 43 yard FG and a bad decision by Kyler Murray to slide instead of getting some extra yards and a first down....that game could have easily been a loss.

13 hours ago, KINGnabb said:

 

And Their Off to Arizona. Lets bring it back home to Philly.  Before this season, the Eagles haven't won in Arizona for 21 years.  They beat the Cardinals in Week 5 to break that.    Now they will have to do it twice.   The Eagles were 7-1 on the Road this year (7-0 when Jalen Starts).   Technically they are the "Home" team this Super Bowl but I still view it as a Road game.  

Very much a home crowd.  Eagles travel well. There are a lot of retirees from Philly in AZ.  Lots of tiks sold to PA residents. Going to be 🎵green green grass and blue blue skies🎵 for Philly in AZ

14 minutes ago, EazyEaglez said:

If he does that, he needs a statue with sirianni of them discussing the QB sneak trick play that will win us the game.

14 minutes ago, EazyEaglez said:

Super Bowls are incredible, but I judge players on more. For that reason if he wins I would currently go (Cunningham onwards, I never saw Jaws play)

1) McNabb

2) Cunningham 

3) Hurts

4) Foles

5) Wentz

6) Vick

Hurts absolutely has potential to be 1 on this list though.

12 minutes ago, ManchesterEagle said:

Super Bowls are incredible, but I judge players on more. For that reason if he wins I would currently go (Cunningham onwards, I never saw Jaws play)

1) McNabb

2) Cunningham 

3) Hurts

4) Foles

5) Wentz

6) Vick

Hurts absolutely has potential to be 1 on this list though.

Depending how the rest of his career goes he definitely has time to climb this list and he’s already 3rd. 

10 hours ago, Vee said:

On a missed 43 yard FG and a bad decision by Kyler Murray to slide instead of getting some extra yards and a first down....that game could have easily been a loss.

A FG would have only tied the game. Both teams were using a replacement kicker for that game. 

3 hours ago, ManchesterEagle said:

Super Bowls are incredible, but I judge players on more. For that reason if he wins I would currently go (Cunningham onwards, I never saw Jaws play)

1) McNabb

2) Cunningham 

3) Hurts

4) Foles

5) Wentz

6) Vick

Hurts absolutely has potential to be 1 on this list though.

Mine is similar. I'd knock Wentz to 6 and put Jaws at 5.

He by no means is an outstanding QB, but he deserves a spot IMO.

5 hours ago, ManchesterEagle said:

Super Bowls are incredible, but I judge players on more. For that reason if he wins I would currently go (Cunningham onwards, I never saw Jaws play)

1) McNabb

2) Cunningham 

3) Hurts

4) Foles

5) Wentz

6) Vick

Hurts absolutely has potential to be 1 on this list though.

I'd only flip foles and hurts. Foles had a wildly productive season before as our starter, and then another season got us a Superbowl. Hurts is climbing, but to jump top 3 now seems kinda wild after an average season at best and then a great season...

3 hours ago, Shalodeep said:

I'd only flip foles and hurts. Foles had a wildly productive season before as our starter, and then another season got us a Superbowl. Hurts is climbing, but to jump top 3 now seems kinda wild after an average season at best and then a great season...

 

Hurts didn't have a season where he got us to the Super Bowl.  He had a stretch of a few games.  Little different to start the entire season to earn that #1 seed and then take the team to the Super Bowl. 

3 hours ago, Shalodeep said:

I'd only flip foles and hurts. Foles had a wildly productive season before as our starter, and then another season got us a Superbowl. Hurts is climbing, but to jump top 3 now seems kinda wild after an average season at best and then a great season...

Yeah I mean it’s debatable. I do see your argument, but Foles’s two best seasons, he came in as a backup in both. I think Hurts was better than he gets credit for last year, especially considering 2020.

I would maybe qualify it by saying that I think I would need Hurts to play well on Sunday and win for me to put him above Foles. But if he does the fact that he took the Eagles all the way from start to finish would give him the edge for me.

48 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

Hurts didn't have a season where he got us to the Super Bowl.  He had a stretch of a few games.  Little different to start the entire season to earn that #1 seed and then take the team to the Super Bowl. 

You really need to proof read before hitting submit. 

1 hour ago, ManchesterEagle said:

Yeah I mean it’s debatable. I do see your argument, but Foles’s two best seasons, he came in as a backup in both. I think Hurts was better than he gets credit for last year, especially considering 2020.

I would maybe qualify it by saying that I think I would need Hurts to play well on Sunday and win for me to put him above Foles. But if he does the fact that he took the Eagles all the way from start to finish would give him the edge for me.

Definitely can see that l being the situation. McNabb coming off the top will take a few seasons of success. Foles can be passed. I think Wentz numbers were good for multiple years, but ZERO playoff success no matter who's fault or what circumstances cant have you top five. It's actually a pretty weak list of qbs we've had

1 hour ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

Hurts didn't have a season where he got us to the Super Bowl.  He had a stretch of a few games.  Little different to start the entire season to earn that #1 seed and then take the team to the Super Bowl. 

Are you getting your QBs confused? 

5 minutes ago, Aerolithe_Lion said:

Are you getting your QBs confused? 

Nah he just can't bring himself to type out Foles