32 minutes ago, brkmsn said:

One play is not detrimental if it doesn't cause harm. If you take a sack on 1st down, lose 7 yards and on the next two plays get enough yards to convert a 1st down, that sack was not detrimental. It's that simple. Can a sack be detrimental? Absolutely (see Purdy in the NFCCG). But a sack is not detrimental if it ends up being harmless. 

Feel free to keep doubling down on the narrative. 

Wrong

1 minute ago, TorontoEagle said:

Wrong

please explain

Hurts is going to Will us to victory!

The most detrimental thing is the circle jerk of Washers who instead of being humble about how stupid and wrong they were, now have turned into a pack of trolls.

All because we're on the verge of winning a SB led by the QB they endlessly denigrated, while the one they couldn't stop fellating has proven to be a total failure.

Nevertheless, I hope these sad, bitter and worthless trolls will enjoy the SB victory tomorrow!

31 minutes ago, Arsenal79 said:

The most detrimental thing is the circle jerk of Washers who instead of being humble about how stupid and wrong they were, now have turned into a pack of trolls.

All because we're on the verge of winning a SB led by the QB they endlessly denigrated, while the one they couldn't stop fellating has proven to be a total failure.

Nevertheless, I hope these sad, bitter and worthless trolls will enjoy the SB victory tomorrow!

Who?

43 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

Who?

I'm guessing whoever is worried he's talking about them. 

9 minutes ago, brkmsn said:

I'm guessing whoever is worried he's talking about them. 

Fair enough

6 hours ago, brkmsn said:

please explain

I’ve explained. I won’t dumb it down any further 

32 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

I’ve explained. I won’t dumb it down any further 

lol 

I wonder what is worse, a sack on a possession that ultimately ends in an offensive TD or a completed pass on 3rd that ends up short of a 1st down and leads to a punt. 

 

Just now, brkmsn said:

lol 

I wonder what is worse, a sack on a possession that ultimately ends in an offensive TD or a completed pass on 3rd that ends up short of a 1st down and leads to a punt. 

 

What’s worse is not knowing the actual definition of detrimental. But you do you

9 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

What’s worse is not knowing the actual definition of detrimental. But you do you

Something can be detrimental, but if no harm comes from it, it is by definition not detrimental. Drinking can be detrimental to one's health and/or well being. Drinking is not guaranteed to be detrimental, however. 

I suggested you pick a more appropriate word, yet you continue to double-down on the poor word you chose. I posted a clip of a sack above where Hurts wasn't hit and ran out of bounds for a 4 inch loss. It was credited as a sack in the game. We scored a TD on that drive. In order for that sack to be detrimental, it had to "cause harm." What harm did it cause? Every sack is a "negative play." Every sack is statistically a TFL. But not every sack is "detrimental."

I realize the world today is constantly rewriting definitions to words such as woman, they, them, period, etc... Unfortunately, I don't have the latest dictionary. Perhaps you can post for me the new world definition of "detrimental."

 

13 minutes ago, brkmsn said:

Something can be detrimental, but if no harm comes from it, it is by definition not detrimental. Drinking can be detrimental to one's health and/or well being. Drinking is not guaranteed to be detrimental, however. 

I suggested you pick a more appropriate word, yet you continue to double-down on the poor word you chose. I posted a clip of a sack above where Hurts wasn't hit and ran out of bounds for a 4 inch loss. It was credited as a sack in the game. We scored a TD on that drive. In order for that sack to be detrimental, it had to "cause harm." What harm did it cause? Every sack is a "negative play." Every sack is statistically a TFL. But not every sack is "detrimental."

I realize the world today is constantly rewriting definitions to words such as woman, they, them, period, etc... Unfortunately, I don't have the latest dictionary. Perhaps you can post for me the new world definition of "detrimental."

 

Just now, TorontoEagle said:

That's what I expected. No argument --- just a meme. 

17 hours ago, NOTW said:

I hope Hurts dominates and is a key part of the Eagles second Super Bowl.

But he is our franchise QB no matter what happens and we are lucky to have him going forwards.

Hurts is no issue in this game.  He going to give 110% to get it done like he has all year and the team will follow.

Kicking and screaming to the end. 😂🤣😂

I've always said regardless of play on the field I respected Hurts mentality, focus, leadership, work ethic & character. I like him more every time I hear from him.

He took a leap most were surprised by from last season to now.

Now he's in the biggest spotlight of the NFL to prove himself or not. It's all led to this, incredible. 

"I don't think he has anything to prove," Lurie told ESPN. "He is an MVP-caliber quarterback, an incredible leader of the team on the field (and) off the field. He's 24 years old, incredibly mature and, most importantly, driven to be even better.“
Jeff Lurie owner of the Eagles.

https://www.foxnews.com/sports/jalen-hurts-contract-extension-rumors-heat-up-eagles-get-set-play-super-bowl-lvii
 

At this point if you really do hate Jalen Hurts being the quarterback of the Philadelphia Eagles, then you might want to start looking to become a fan of one of those teams of quarterbacks you guys have been fawning over so much. It doesn’t seem like this guy and his style of play is going anywhere anytime soon. Go Eagles! 

WTF was that? A choke?

 

Yeah, I hate to say it.  But if we lose this game, that's the kind of mistake Hurts might never live down with Philly fans

19 minutes ago, Macho Grande said:

Yeah, I hate to say it.  But if we lose this game, that's the kind of mistake Hurts might never live down with Philly fans

No you idiot

45 minutes ago, CouchKing said:

WTF was that? A choke?

 

 

37 minutes ago, Macho Grande said:

Yeah, I hate to say it.  But if we lose this game, that's the kind of mistake Hurts might never live down with Philly fans

Dumb, fluke play.

Comments about his TDs and big plays? 

5 minutes ago, NOTW said:

 

Dumb, fluke play.

Comments about his TDs and big plays? 

Been impressed overall with his play.  Still doesn't take away from the fact that Philly fans will bring that fumble up for years to come if we lose this game.  I won't be one of them, but that's just the way it is.

Just now, Macho Grande said:

Been impressed overall with his play.  Still doesn't take away from the fact that Philly fans will bring that fumble up for years to come if we lose this game.  I won't be one of them, but that's just the way it is.

No only the stupid ones will, if they didn't come back and get a long drive and score a TD then it would be an issue , but they did and are up by ten at the half