October 29, 20241 yr Just now, barho said: Did you not read my post? That was the ONLY time they made an endorsement. Most national papers do NOT endorse presidential candidates. Beat it, dope. So again, dope, they endorsed Biden and just 4 years later said she isn't as good and not worth endorsing.
October 29, 20241 yr 5 minutes ago, paco said: Like me starting Winston last week? I guess crazier things have happened. Did you eat a dub?
October 29, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, Kz! said: Yes, he wouldn't just strip the licenses, his idea is to allow companies to bid for invaluable licenses that have previously just been handed out. The idea would likely bring in tens of billions of revenue for the country. But yeah, that does kind of sound like something Hitler might do. "But what he really meant was..."
October 29, 20241 yr Just now, Diehardfan said: So again, dope, they endorsed Biden and just 4 years later said she isn't as good and not worth endorsing. haha....you clearly don't get it. It was the ONLY time they endorsed a presidential candidate. Now go and see what other NATIONAL newspapers endorse a presidential candidate besides the NY Time.....ah forget it I'll do it for you. Basically, national papers simply do NOT endorse presidential candidates. I could care less about the last election. It just isn't typical. Get lost loser. https://www.poynter.org/commentary/2024/washington-post-los-angeles-times-not-endorsing-harris-trump-president/ USA Today, which endorsed a presidential candidate for the first time in its 38 years in 2020, has reverted to neutrality. The Wall Street Journal hasn’t backed a presidential candidate since Herbert Hoover. If it were to shift course in the next few days, that would be a true October surprise. That leaves The New York Times by its lonesome among national newspapers in still endorsing (Harris, of course, several times over).
October 29, 20241 yr 6 minutes ago, Paul852 said: Did you eat a dub? Bigly Scoring is nuts in that league, a lot of non standards stuff. Like 1 point for 5 completions, 40 or 50 yard TDs get bonuses, 7 point bonus for over 100 yards receiving\rushing, etc. I was first in scoring that week, he was 4th, almost 3rd. If Mason didn't go down, he would have likely been #2. Spoiler
October 29, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, paco said: Bigly Scoring is nuts in that league, a lot of non standards stuff. Like 1 point for 5 completions, 7 point bonus for over 100 yards receiving\rushing, etc. I was first in scoring that week, he was 4th, almost 3rd. I would never be able to keep track of those bonuses. That's crazy.
October 29, 20241 yr Just now, Paul852 said: I would never be able to keep track of those bonuses. That's crazy. Last year my brother in law lost by 7 points. Because Devonta Smith had 99 yards. If he had ONE more catch for ONE yard he would have overcame the 7 point deficit. It personally drives me nuts since i'm in 2 other leagues plus play DFS, but whatever. I got use to it.
October 29, 20241 yr Still a sizeable advantage. Trump has to win election day by 25.9 percent of the vote just to match the pre election voting. Good luck with that.
October 29, 20241 yr Just now, paco said: Last year my brother in law lost by 7 points. Because Devonta Smith had 99 yards. If he had ONE more catch for ONE yard he would have overcame the 7 point deficit. It personally drives me nuts since i'm in 2 other leagues plus play DFS, but whatever. I got use to it. Yeah, I'm in two leagues (6-2 and 5-3 ) but one of them has the bonuses. It's nearly impossible to get an idea if you're going to win during super close contests.
October 29, 20241 yr 8 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: "But what he really meant was..." Retards can rarely process additional context. Much better to just parrot media talking points as dumb as "Trump is Hitler!" over and over again.
October 29, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, jsdarkstar said: Still a sizeable advantage. Trump has to win election day by 25.9 percent of the vote just to match the pre election voting. Good luck with that. How does that math make sense? Pretty sure it was like 70% for the dems and 25% for repubs and by the end of the election Trump only lost by 1.5%
October 29, 20241 yr Just now, Paul852 said: Yeah, I'm in two leagues (6-2 and 5-3 ) but one of them has the bonuses. It's nearly impossible to get an idea if you're going to win during super close contests. Oh, one more wacky one: Yards allowed matters Spoiler Less than 100 total yards allowed (YA100)15 100-199 total yards allowed (YA199)12 200-299 total yards allowed (YA299)10 300-349 total yards allowed (YA349)8 350-399 total yards allowed (YA399)5 400-449 total yards allowed (YA449)-5 450-499 total yards allowed (YA499)-7.5 500-549 total yards allowed (YA549)-10 550+ total yards allowed (YA550)-15 Not only does it REALLY throw off projections when your defense starts, but you can be sitting there with 3 minutes to go with a slim lead only to see it disappear despite your defense surrendering any points.
October 29, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, paco said: Oh, one more wacky one: Yards allowed matters Hide contents Less than 100 total yards allowed (YA100)15 100-199 total yards allowed (YA199)12 200-299 total yards allowed (YA299)10 300-349 total yards allowed (YA349)8 350-399 total yards allowed (YA399)5 400-449 total yards allowed (YA449)-5 450-499 total yards allowed (YA499)-7.5 500-549 total yards allowed (YA549)-10 550+ total yards allowed (YA550)-15 Not only does it REALLY throw off projections when your defense starts, but you can be sitting there with 3 minutes to go with a slim lead only to see it disappear despite your defense surrendering any points. Wait, that doesn't even account for scoring. Can your defense really go like -30?
October 29, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, Kz! said: Retards can rarely process additional context. Much better to just parrot media talking points as dumb as "Trump is Hitler!" over and over again. "Additional context" Here's your additional context Quote "They are almost all dishonest and corrupt, but Comcast, with its one-side and vicious coverage by NBC NEWS, and in particular MSNBC, often and correctly referred to as MSDNC (Democrat National Committee!), should be investigated for its ‘Country Threatening Treason,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social website. "We need to investigate free speech because it's treason!" Also "Don't call me a fascist! It's mean!"
October 29, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, Paul852 said: Wait, that doesn't even account for scoring. Can your defense really go like -30? -20 but yeah Spoiler 0 points allowed (PA0)15 1-6 points allowed (PA1)12 7-13 points allowed (PA7)10 14-17 points allowed (PA14)8 18-21 points allowed (PA18)7 22-27 points allowed (PA22)5 28-34 points allowed (PA28)3 46+ points allowed (PA46)-5 Unlikely though because..... defenses get credit for return yards.
October 29, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, paco said: -20 but yeah Hide contents 0 points allowed (PA0)15 1-6 points allowed (PA1)12 7-13 points allowed (PA7)10 14-17 points allowed (PA14)8 18-21 points allowed (PA18)7 22-27 points allowed (PA22)5 28-34 points allowed (PA28)3 46+ points allowed (PA46)-5 Unlikely though because..... defenses get credit for return yards. Oh screw that
October 29, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, Paul852 said: Oh screw that Trust me, if it wasn't my brother in law's league and schmoopie wasn't in it, I'd say no too. And even then it took a little convincing.
October 29, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, paco said: Trust me, if it wasn't my brother in law's league and schmoopie wasn't in it, I'd say no too. And even then it took a little convincing. does everyone in the league own an electric car?
October 29, 20241 yr 9 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: "Additional context" Here's your additional context "We need to investigate free speech because it's treason!" Also "Don't call me a fascist! It's mean!" The US government is under no obligation to give free access to public airways to major media companies - especially those who exhibit gross political bias. And no, windy, that's not suppressing free speech.
Create an account or sign in to comment