31 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

So you already moved on from the over prosecution of criminals already or which is it. 

That tweet was so two days ago. Catch up.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4795823-trump-encourages-christians-vote/amp/
 

Here is what I could find on the subject.  Seems like he’s basically saying to vote this time as he’ll have it fixed in 4 years.  Still seems odd for him to say.

4 minutes ago, RPeeteRules said:

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4795823-trump-encourages-christians-vote/amp/
 

Here is what I could find on the subject.  Seems like he’s basically saying to vote this time as he’ll have it fixed in 4 years.  Still seems odd for him to say.

It's extremely odd considering things can be changed again.

44 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

The felon’s candidacy is more in line with your views.

No. I think he'll cause more turmoil than she will. She will be more of the same which to me has been a series of failures. I think he'll be a vengeful troublemaker who will have his own failures.  

1 hour ago, lynched1 said:

Hasn't been for three years

It's sad they ran his a** into the ground with all of those events, appearances, etc. Kamala and Jill should be charged with elder abuse.

🤣🤣🤣 alliance with the Rebublic of North Korea

Significant video, which is significant in itself for "today, which is today",  just like "yesterday was today yesterday"

5 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

🤣🤣🤣 alliance with the Rebublic of North Korea

Significant video, which is significant in itself for "today, which is today",  just like "yesterday was today yesterday"

How is a propaganda video a significant video? It's an advertisement that delivers a message crafted by the creators of it. To invoke any idea of fact is to not understand such tactics. Using an AI to simulate her voice is today. 

4 minutes ago, Next_Up said:

How is a propaganda video a significant video? It's an advertisement that delivers a message crafted by the creators of it. To invoke any idea of fact is to not understand such tactics. Using an AI to simulate her voice is today. 

If you watch it it's mocking her words from real speeches as well including her use of significant. I threw in the today and yesterday quotes from another.

It's funny. Stop being uptight after 4 days of couch jokes. Go do a Trump one.

2 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

If you watch it it's mocking her words from real speeches as well including her use of significant. I threw in the today and yesterday quotes from another.

It's funny. Stop being uptight after 4 days of couch jokes.

Fair enough. 

5 hours ago, Toastrel said:

We'll have it fixed so good you'll not gonna have to vote.

What's both funny and sad is maga leaders have told everyone what they intend to do and yet the cult members think it's fear mongering from the left

22 hours ago, SPIDER-MAN said:

Just because people are dead doesn't mean it was real. You put it past Trump to sacrifice people if he thought it would help him? He cares about NO ONE but himself. He'd sacrifice Melania and his kids for more power.

Dude.

I see Harris as the most dangerous presidential candidate in at least modern American history.  She is perceived as feckless by our adversaries, who would be sure to test her.  She is also very far to the left and would move the trajectory of our nation in that direction which would hurt us economically, and I believe on a social level as well.

It's shocking to see how the Dem party moved to the far left after the very successful Clinton centrist years.

When Trump was prez, the international relations front was relatively quiet.  The noise was coming from his mouth.  All in all, not a bad tradeoff.

On 7/26/2024 at 11:29 AM, Mike31mt said:

You must be really scared about this reality where "We might get to vote again, but our votes won't count. "

This age liked fine wine

 

 

Here's the conservative National Review article on the developments in the Democratic party and the presidential race.  Interesting read.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/07/democrats-are-scrambling-to-nominate-kamala-harris-our-strategy-hasnt-changed/?bypass_key=QXU0dVAzMFNONkxIMXd6V2JmVk9GQT09OjpSRE5uU1ZCWmVXcDBhbXBpYlc5WVdtZEpSMDFZWnowOQ%3D%3D

Democrats Are Scrambling to Nominate Kamala Harris. Our Strategy Hasn’t Changed

Vice President Kamala Harris delivers remarks at a press conference following a meeting with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington, D.C., July 25, 2024.(Nathan Howard/Reuters)

July 26, 2024 1:23 PM

Just a great pic DonOLD

5 Excerpts From JD Vance’s Emails to a Transgender Classmate A former Yale Law School classmate shared with The Times about 90 emails and text messages with Mr. Vance. Here are some of the most revealing moments in their correspondence.

Oct. 23, 2014

‘I hate the police.’

In October 2014, in the wake of the killing of Michael Brown, a Black 18-year-old, by a white police officer in Ferguson, Mo., Nelson raised the idea of requiring that police officers wear body cameras.

Mr. Vance responded with sympathy for those upset by the police violence.

‘What seems different to me is that the Republican Party offers nothing that’s as attractive as the demagogue.’

In 2015, Mr. Vance was opposed to Mr. Trump’s candidacy.

In December of that year, Nelson wrote to Mr. Vance that a Muslim friend had said that women wearing hijabs no longer felt safe doing simple things like going to the grocery store.

‘The more white people feel like voting for Trump, the more Black people will suffer.’

In September 2016, Mr. Vance shared a piece on implicit bias that he wrote for The New York Times following Hillary Clinton’s ill-fated "basket of deplorables” comment, thanking Nelson in the email for helping inform his thinking in developing the essay.

Image

 

An excerpt from an email from Mr. Vance in September 2016.

 

Oct. 4, 2016

‘A morally reprehensible human being.’

As the 2016 election neared, Nelson wrote of plans to go door-knocking for Mrs. Clinton.

Mr. Vance, living in California at the time, wrote that "I’m counting my lucky stars that I live in a place where I don’t have to vote for her (because the margin will be so huge), because I know I could never support Trump if it really mattered.”

Still, like many, Mr. Vance predicted that Mrs. Clinton would prevail, and called Mr. Trump a "disaster.”

Image

 

A screenshot of an email from Mr. Vance to Nelson in October 2016.

 

47 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

🤣🤣🤣 alliance with the Rebublic of North Korea

Significant video, which is significant in itself for "today, which is today",  just like "yesterday was today yesterday"

I was wrong about you, you are the POS you appear to be.

15 minutes ago, Gannan said:

This age liked fine wine

 

 

But you see, what he meant was...

 

15 hours ago, HazletonEagle said:

Im going back and trying to research RFK's stances. Cause I might not vote for the Dem or Rep tickets. 

I hate RFK's ideas about covid and vaccines. But I have to see if he might otherwise be the most palatable. He has a nice video on how he views the state of the union, can be found on youtube from a few days ago. But it fails to address his plans on how to fix any of that. 

He talks about the middle class, and unity though. So, its intriguing. 

You absolutely should vote for RFK.

12 hours ago, HazletonEagle said:

You fell for a lot of lies.  Sad.

You need to do some self evaluation.

2 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:

You need to do some self evaluation.

They have no clue what that is. 

20 minutes ago, Tweek said:

But you see, what he meant was...

It’s sad how easy they ignore it. They don’t care. 

2 hours ago, HazletonEagle said:

I just looked it up for myself and decided not to waste time explaining it to willfully ignorant people who will just laugh it off and ignore it anyway.

Every time you think you "explain something" you come off sounding more stupid and ignorant than before. 

Educate yourself. But pay for it with your own money this time.

39 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said:

I was wrong about you, you are the POS you appear to be.

We obviously have different senses of humor. I'm able to laugh at stuff that's funny about both sides. It isn't a joke about her personal life, and I'd laugh at one about Trump. How people can read a few days of couch jokes and get offended by something like that is beyond me. You only want to laugh at things that go one way. Nothing I can do about that. 

1 hour ago, PoconoDon said:

No. I think he'll cause more turmoil than she will. She will be more of the same which to me has been a series of failures. I think he'll be a vengeful troublemaker who will have his own failures.  

Can you enumerate the actions and legislation that Biden signed into law that has been a series of failures? 

Objectively, the two things that stick out are the relief act he signed into law weeks after his inauguration that in hindsight was not necessary and contributed to (but did not cause) inflation, and the poorly executed withdrawal from Afghanistan. 

The latter is a talking point but nobody really cares. We're out and no longer at war with someone for the first time in decades, and Biden was the one who actually did it. 

The relief act turned out to be overkill, but inflation was going to be an issue for us either way because the primary root cause was supply chain issues coupled with a buildup of demand, both from Covid. People already had Covid bucks from before Biden, and while it's fair to say that the relief act exacerbated it we would have still had significant inflation to battle.

Contrast the US recovery with other advanced nations and we look very good. 

CHIPS and Infrastructure is resulting in a lot of reinvestment in domestic production. Trump promised to accomplish this but failed; Foxconn is an embarrassing testament to Trump's big talk but little tangible results typical of his first term.