Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 hours ago, Diehardfan said:

Kudos to Harris for agreeing to debate on Fox News if it's true. Takes guts I'll give her that. I'm driving in the middle of WY with bad service so I'm having trouble seeing if the posts on X are true.

Do you think a network that agreed to a $787M settlement, which was found in discovery to have knowingly lied in order to perpetuate election denialism, should have a platform to host and moderate a presidential debate?

There has to be a price to pay to attempt to subvert democracy.  For the FOX Network, that needs to be disqualification from any serious political relevance.

  • Replies 37.4k
  • Views 553.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

1 minute ago, Alphagrand said:

Do you think a network that agreed to a $787M settlement, which was found in discovery to have knowingly lied in order to perpetuate election denialism, should have a platform to host and moderate a presidential debate?

There has to be a price to pay to attempt to subvert democracy.  For the FOX Network, that needs to be disqualification from any serious political relevance.

stop it with the one sided democracy crap. its too funny. 

5 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

why the hell would Kamala be included in that? We already had a democratic presidential nominee. It would have been Biden, and/or RFK.... You guys are so friggin stupid...

And again, Im sure he will debate her. Its a cant miss opportunity to get her in front of a national audience without a teleprompter. 

Wasn’t the agreement that Biden and Trump would debate two times?  Obviously, it wouldn’t make sense to debate Biden again.  I would think a debate between Harris and Trump would want to have a new agreement.  If Trump only wants it on FOX, that’d seem weak to me.

3 minutes ago, RPeeteRules said:

Wasn’t the agreement that Biden and Trump would debate two times?  Obviously, it wouldn’t make sense to debate Biden again.  I would think a debate between Harris and Trump would want to have a new agreement.  If Trump only wants it on FOX, that’d seem weak to me.

Biden dropped out.... that agreement seems to have ended. 

Im sure Trump will have a new agreement to debate Kamala. She will make a fool of herself. He HAS to take that opportunity. 

  • Author

 

 

5 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

Biden dropped out.... that agreement seems to have ended. 

Im sure Trump will have a new agreement to debate Kamala. She will make a fool of herself. He HAS to take that opportunity. 

I agree that the agreement would seemingly have ended.

I’m very interested to see the Trump/Harris debate.  I expect it to be very entertaining.  I do think that the majority of people who watch won’t be swayed to change their vote.

3 minutes ago, RPeeteRules said:

I agree that the agreement would seemingly have ended.

I’m very interested to see the Trump/Harris debate.  I expect it to be very entertaining.  I do think that the majority of people who watch won’t be swayed to change their vote.

Agree. Its mostly entertainment. Trump will say stuff that upsets people after they twist his words or meaning. And Harris will be the babbling idiot she always is without a teleprompter. Shes guaranteed to give a couple more classic sound clips.

Both sides will declare victory because their opponent will have done something dumb.

1 hour ago, HazletonEagle said:

why the hell would Kamala be included in that? We already had a democratic presidential nominee. It would have been Biden, and/or RFK.... You guys are so friggin stupid...

And again, Im sure he will debate her. Its a cant miss opportunity to get her in front of a national audience without a teleprompter. 

Wrong again, Biden was the presumed nominee. No where in the agreement was it a debate against Biden. Again, I know reading is hard for you guys but read WHAT was agreed to. He agreed to debate ANYONE WHO IS ELGIBLE WITH 15% in polls  and ELGIBLE to receive 270 EC votes. This means it if rfk was hitting 15%, he was ALSO eligible.  

Also to note, from the agreement:

The determination on whether a candidate meets all the above requirements and is therefore eligible to participate in the debate will be made promptly after Sept. 3, 2024.

Take Tylenol for any headaches

  • Author

White man whitesplaining how black people should feel. Too bad the black guys that back him up only called him, and he couldn’t get them on camera too. Weird.

 

 

1 hour ago, HazletonEagle said:

why the hell would Kamala be included in that? We already had a democratic presidential nominee.

No we didn't. Please google how conventions work before you try to talk to the grown ups. 

1 minute ago, Gannan said:

No we didn't. Please google how conventions work before you try to talk to the grown ups. 

Oh right. I forgot. Everything is working exactly how its supposed to. Except that you didnt have a say in your candidate. Very by the book. Very fair. Very democratic process. 

11 minutes ago, The_Omega said:

White man whitesplaining how black people should feel. Too bad the black guys that back him up only called him, and he couldn’t get them on camera too. Weird.

 

 

Those guys definitely do their own research. And by that I mean, take whatever twitter says as fact. 

3 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

Oh right. I forgot. Everything is working exactly how its supposed to. Except that you didnt have a say in your candidate. Very by the book. Very fair. Very democratic process. 

What do you think happens if they go to a primary?  Who’s gonna beat her in that case?  And also don’t forget than anyone that would have been a legitimate candidate in that ballot had already backed her and withdrew any interest in it.  So she would have been in a primary ballot alone.  What’s the point?  The only people upset about her being the presidential candidate now are the people who are afraid of her and know they’re gonna lose.  I think the $380M raised in 3 weeks should speak volumes.  There was no point to having anyone else, and I don’t think you’ll find a single democrat upset there wasn’t a primary.  Plus, republicans have no room to speak about democracy. Your cult tried to destroy it so why do you suddenly care about it now? 

2 minutes ago, DBW said:

What do you think happens if they go to a primary?  Who’s gonna beat her in that case?  And also don’t forget than anyone that would have been a legitimate candidate in that ballot had already backed her and withdrew any interest in it.  So she would have been in a primary ballot alone.  What’s the point?  The only people upset about her being the presidential candidate now are the people who are afraid of her and know they’re gonna lose.  I think the $380M raised in 3 weeks should speak volumes.  There was no point to having anyone else, and I don’t think you’ll find a single democrat upset there wasn’t a primary.  Plus, republicans have no room to speak about democracy. Your cult tried to destroy it so why do you suddenly care about it now? 

ahhh yes... whats the point of holding elections? :roll:

12 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

Oh right. I forgot. Everything is working exactly how its supposed to. Except that you didnt have a say in your candidate. Very by the book. Very fair. Very democratic process. 

Was there a Republican presidential primary in 2020? Did you cry about it then?

1 minute ago, MidMoFo said:

Was there a Republican presidential primary in 2020? Did you cry about it then?

ah yes. the willful ignorance is strong. 

Just now, HazletonEagle said:

ah yes. the willful ignorance is strong. 

Do you cry about that too?

Just now, MidMoFo said:

Do you cry about that too?

your ignorance? I laugh at it.

1 minute ago, HazletonEagle said:

your ignorance? I laugh at it.

So… Was there a Republican presidential primary in 2020? Did you cry about it then?

Just now, MidMoFo said:

So… Was there a Republican presidential primary in 2020? Did you cry about it then?

its up to you to acknowledge the difference back then, and this time around. I dont play dumb with you guys. I just laugh.

We all know you are dumb, HE, dont worry

Just now, HazletonEagle said:

its up to you to acknowledge the difference back then, and this time around. I dont play dumb with you guys. I just laugh.

You know how stupid you will look if you answer it truthfully.

Just now, MidMoFo said:

You know how stupid you will look if you answer it truthfully.

wrong...I know how stupid you look for even asking that.

1 minute ago, HazletonEagle said:

wrong...I know how stupid you look for even asking that.

So… was there a presidential Republican primary in 2020?

Create an account or sign in to comment