1 hour ago, VanHammersly said:

 

Looks like a guy who would grab a gun and start offing people who stormed the castle and threatened democracy.  He’s great, I’ll take 14 more of him.   

Just now, Dave Moss said:

Sounds like you’ve never had the meatballs

I wouldn’t feed my dog that crap 🤣

9 minutes ago, Phillyterp85 said:

Lol no one hurt me.  Just because I don’t think she’s popular doesn’t mean "someone hurt me”.  She’s not a good speaker.  She’s not a policy wonk.  And we have actual data to support my argument, the 2020 primary.

We're about to have much better data, the 2024 election.

2 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

Sounds like you’ve never had the meatballs

You mean the Ukjladstedim?  which prolly translates to "cat food pellots of constipation"

Hear me out...

 

 

 

 

 

...Co-Vice Presidents

Lock him up

7 minutes ago, WentzFan11 said:

Cause no one changes over 4 years. 

Right so what has changed about her?  Has she become a better speaker?  Nope.  Still word salad who looks like she’s trying to reach a minimum word count on a highschool essay whenever she has to speak without a script.  Has she had some become some policy wiz? If so what are these policy ideas she’s put forward that would have increased her popularity?

Just now, Phillyterp85 said:

Right so what has changed about her?  Has she become a better speaker?  Nope.  Still word salad who looks like she’s trying to reach a minimum word count on a highschool essay whenever she has to speak without a script.  Has she had some become some policy wiz? If so what are these policy ideas she’s put forward that would have increased her popularity?

She’s VP.  That’s what changed.  Biden never sniffed the nomination in 5 tries until he served two terms as Obama’s VP

8 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

I think that, plus the fundraising to date, proves she's certainly popular enough to win the election. Which is all that really matters anyways, no point in trying to split hairs on this.

Sure she’s popular enough to beat Trump.  I agree with that.

2 minutes ago, Phillyterp85 said:

Right so what has changed about her?  Has she become a better speaker?  Nope.  Still word salad who looks like she’s trying to reach a minimum word count on a highschool essay whenever she has to speak without a script.  Has she had some become some policy wiz? If so what are these policy ideas she’s put forward that would have increased her popularity?

She’s been the right hand to the President for 4 years. 

1 minute ago, Phillyterp85 said:

Sure she’s popular enough to beat Trump.  I agree with that.

That's kinda the only choice we're faced with. What else matters?

What a difference from those "You’re fired” signs in the Trump rally to the "We win” signs tonight. 

7 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

She’s VP.  That’s what changed.  Biden never sniffed the nomination in 5 tries until he served two terms as Obama’s VP

That is a good point and is true. But I also think Biden has a general like ability factor about him and an appeal to independents and moderates that Kamala doesn’t have.  

 

7 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

That's kinda the only choice we're faced with. What else matters?

Just opining on hypotheticals.  I think the Dems would have an easier time beating Trump had someone else been the candidate is all.

Just now, Phillyterp85 said:

Just opining on hypotheticals.  I think the Dems would have an easier time beating Trump had someone else been the candidate is all.

Possibly, but thats not where we are. Only giving Trump 100 days to come up with new hate messaging seems to be going great thus far. Kamala is the only candidate who could’ve been accepted this late in the game. 
 

Trump has resorted to calling her Lyin or laughing Kamala or calling her Kamabla. Not sure what that even means. 

1 hour ago, Mike030270 said:

She said that back in 2022

Doesn't make it better. Some people here need a reminder.  

4 minutes ago, WentzFan11 said:

Possibly, but thats not where we are. Only giving Trump 100 days to come up with new hate messaging seems to be going great thus far. Kamala is the only candidate who could’ve been accepted this late in the game. 
 

Trump has resorted to calling her Lyin or laughing Kamala or calling her Kamabla. Not sure what that even means. 

Has Trump finally learned to use an apostrophe correct?   Or is he still screwing that up too.

31 minutes ago, dawkins4prez said:

Man , I really don't see it.  It does come off as Jewish Obama and with kamala already using the cadence of female Obama they just weren't a good match.  Like what's with that accent?

I figured she would pick a middle aged white dude, a veteran, and Walz checks those boxes. Having a Jewish VP pick right now would be suicidal, given the state of the world, and the ongoing protests and stupidity here at home over Israel and Palestine.

I thought Buttgieg and Shapiro were very long shot possibilities who wouldn't make the final cut, because the woman candidate needs to have a steady old white guy to placate the status quo.

 

I didn't think Harris had a shot, and am surprised at the enthusiasm. Also grateful for it, because Donald Trump is a human cancer. If you are still unable to see this, you need mental help, or should maybe read a book once in a while.

Trump is going to need something strange to happen for him to win this election.  He doesn't have any catchy slogan like Build The Wall to appeal to the truly dumb voters; Harris can counter his border BS by saying the problem was dealt with, but Trump killed the bipartisan bill without letting it go to the floor.  He's made zero effort to build his base to include any moderate voters; he's just gotten more wacky, corrupt, and boob.

 

My one worry about Walz is his stance on the transgender issues.  The Trump team and the right in general is going to hit him on that, and it’s already started.  So he needs to be ready respond to the attacks.   There’s a difference between having an accepting stance and letting people be who they want to be; and passing laws that mandate schools put menstruation products in boys bathrooms in schools (if that’s true), and passing laws that give courts the authority to remove a child from their parents if the parents are unwilling to get them gender affirming care (if that’s true), etc…

1 minute ago, Phillyterp85 said:

My one worry about Walz is his stance on the transgender issues.  The Trump team and the right in general is going to hit him on that, and it’s already started.  So he needs to be ready respond to the attacks.   There’s a difference between having an accepting stance and letting people be who they want to be; and passing laws that mandate schools put menstruation products in boys bathrooms in schools (if that’s true), and passing laws that give courts the authority to remove a child from their parents if the parents are unwilling to get them gender affirming care (if that’s true), etc…

They hit the entire party on that already. 

1 hour ago, NOTW said:

Pics of your sister.

(Someone had to say it)

You don't want any parts of that mess.

Just now, JohnSnowsHair said:

You don't want any parts of that mess.

Sounds like you don’t know NOTW

1 hour ago, DEagle7 said:

Because she chose Walz over Shapiro?  Methinks you're overreacting a smidge. 

She needs PA