August 19, 20241 yr 51 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said: Why bother? All risk no reward. Besides, they WANT the orange clown to stick to personal attacks Yup pretty much. Although he's probably going to stick to the personal attacks no matter what.
August 19, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, Toastrel said: Do they think Obama is still running? procus' great granddaughter?
August 19, 20241 yr 12 hours ago, lynched1 said: I have never felt it necessary to drink to that excess and then risk the live of others doing so. You've literally admitted to doing exactly that, but sure thing lynched.
August 19, 20241 yr 13 hours ago, Mike030270 said: Cult Also ew Trumpbots: stop calling us weird! Also Trumpbots: I jerked off in this cup with JD Vance's face on it!
August 19, 20241 yr 36 minutes ago, DEagle7 said: Yup pretty much. Although he's probably going to stick to the personal attacks no matter what. All they need to do is sit back and let him keep talking, he's winning their campaign for then, why interrupt him?
August 19, 20241 yr 41 minutes ago, Toastrel said: If only you could turn that oh so perceptive gaze on your candidate. Besides tariffs and making the failed nation we live in great again through racism and stupidity, what is your candidate's platform? He seems to be running, and losing badly, on crowd size and good looks. He has a platform as outlined on his website. Do you want me to read it to you or what? There's literally nothing on the Harris site. It looks like some scam page, which it kinda is, because all they want is your money and vote and they couldn't give two ishs about earning either. They're quite literally relying solely on TDS. Whatever bright ideas they've come up with so far are either total failures or direct copies of Trump's plan.
August 19, 20241 yr 27 minutes ago, Toastrel said: Can we mark as safe, hun? Nobody show him what her opponent looks like lol Or his economy.
August 19, 20241 yr That pretty much sums it up. They are trying to steal the election. They have no evidence of a non citizen registering to vote in the entire State. Not one example of a why the law is needed. It's a bold face lie and attempt to subvert the election in Arizona. Republicans ask Supreme Court to block 40,000 Arizonans from voting in November The Republican National Committee is urging the Supreme Court to intervene in an Arizona election dispute this week and block up to 40,000 of the state's registered voters from casting ballots in the presidential race. Republican state lawmakers say these voters did not provide proof of their citizenship when they were registered and now they should be barred from from voting in person or by mail. Although Congress made it easier for Americans to register to vote, those federal rules cannot override "the Arizona Legislature’s sovereign authority to determine the qualifications of voters and structure participation in its elections," they said in an emergency appeal filed Aug. 9. The fast-track appeal may signal whether the conservative court is ready to intervene in partisan election disputes. The Arizona Republicans asked for a decision by Thursday because counties will soon begin to print ballots. Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes said the appeal should be rejected. "There is no evidence of fraud and undocumented voting. The 2024 election is weeks away and acting now to restrict the voting rights of a large group of Arizona's voters is undemocratic," he said in a statement. Many of the affected voters are "service members, students and Native Americans who did not have birth certificates while registering," Fontes added. On Friday, Biden administration lawyers also urged the court to turn down the appeal. "Thousands of voters have already registered to vote by filing the federal form without accompanying documentary proof of citizenship," said Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar. "Judicial intervention at this stage would produce unnecessary confusion and chaos on the cusp of an election." Arizona is one of the handful of battleground states that could decide who wins the White House. In 2020, President Biden won the state by 10,457 votes. Last week, the secretary of state's office said 41,128 registered voters in Arizona could be affected by the court's ruling, although some of them are considered "inactive" because they did not vote in the most recent elections. At issue is a long-running dispute in Arizona over whether voters must furnish proof of their citizenship when they register to vote. In 1993, Congress sought to make it easier to register to vote. The National Voter Registration Act, commonly known as the "motor voter" law, allowed prospective voters to fill out a form to register and sign a sworn statement that they were U.S. citizens. But in 2004, Arizona required newly registered voters to provide "documentary proof of citizenship." The ACLU and civil rights advocates sued to challenge that requirement. They cited estimates that more than 13 million Americans lacked access to a birth certificate or other such documents. They won in the lower courts, and the Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that the federal motor voter law preempted or overrode the state's law. Justice Antonin Scalia spoke for the 7-2 majority and said the federal law requires states to "accept and use" the standard federal form in federal elections. In response, Arizona adopted a two-track system of voter registrations. To vote in state and local elections, new registrants were required to show proof of their citizenship with a driver's license or a birth certificate. Those who registered through the federal form were allowed to vote only in federal elections. They are referred to as "federal only" voters. The state later agreed in a 2018 consent decree to give full registration to new voters whose residence and citizenship could be confirmed through its motor vehicles department data base. But two years ago, the Republican-controlled Legislature passed a new law that prohibits registered voters who do not provide proof of their citizenship from voting by mail or in a presidential election. The Justice Department sued to challenge the laws. After a 10-day trial, U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton in Phoenix blocked enforcement of the new proof-of-citizenship requirement, citing the federal motor voter law and the state consent decree. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, by a 2-1 vote, refused to lift her order Aug. 1. A week later, the RNC joined by the two GOP leaders of the Arizona Legislature urged the Supreme Court to set aside Bolton's ruling to the extent that it would "allow voters who have not provided documentary proof of citizenship to cast ballots for president or by mail." They also argued that a federal judge should not be allowed to make a late change in the state's election rules. Danielle Lang, a voting rights attorney for the Campaign Legal Center who worked on the case, said she found that argument to be surprising. "They are trying to upend the law as it has been in Arizona at least since 2018," she said. "The voters who registered using the federal form were not asked to provide proof of citizenship." She said the Republican lawmakers and their attorneys who brought the case "didn't cite a single example of a noncitizen who was enrolled. Not one. Why would someone who is not a citizen try to register? It's a felony and would get you deported, just to cast one ballot."
August 19, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, Boogyman said: All they need to do is sit back and let him keep talking, he's winning their campaign for then, why interrupt him? They're riding the wave of relief from Biden dropping out, it will soon end and they'll actually have to do something besides horribly unauthentic comedy sketches
August 19, 20241 yr 11 hours ago, lynched1 said: Had to stock the restaurant with actors.....😆 So, I guess it's not a problem for you when Trump hires paid actors is it.
August 19, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: We all know what Trump's platform is Yeah bro we all know: On 7/10/2024 at 1:48 PM, Mike31mt said: Oh thank you, I almost forgot these key tenets of Trump's platform. Updated, 7/10/2024: -Terminate the Constitution -Project 2025 -Put Y'all Back in Chains -Kristallnacht for Dems -Be a Russian Operative -Inflation
August 19, 20241 yr 13 hours ago, Mike030270 said: Cult Also ew Post-menopausal women carrying around **** cups for the sake of procreation? Like what? How does that work? I totally lost the plot.
August 19, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, Mike31mt said: because all they want is your money and vote and they couldn't give two ishs about earning either. I know, right? Could you imagine if we elected someone like that?
August 19, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, Dave Moss said: Who cares? Thankfully they’re not catering to your dumb ass or we’d be effed as a country. Well, all that matters is that Trump loses but it is still strange that a POTUS candidate has no platform on their campaign website. Maybe one will be added after the convention.
August 19, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, Mike31mt said: Yeah bro we all know: More like: He's still lying about losing an election He coordinated the submission of false slates of electors to illegally remain in power He incited a deadly riot that threatened the life of his own VP He denigrates military veterans at every opportunity including this latest disgraceful attempt to devalue the courage displayed by CMOH recipients Found liable for rape Indicted in 4 separate criminal cases Convicted in 1 of them already on 34 felony counts Continues to gargle the balls of every dictator on the planet while selling out our allies at a moment's notice WHAT A PLATFORM!
August 19, 20241 yr 6 minutes ago, DrPhilly said: Well, all that matters is that Trump loses but it is still strange that a POTUS candidate has no platform on their campaign website. Maybe one will be added after the convention. She's been running for like 2 weeks.
August 19, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, ToastJenkins said: Why bother? All risk no reward. Besides, they WANT the orange clown to stick to personal attacks Yeah, I understand completely which is my point exactly. It is strange/unique that we've come so far that the Dems have no public platform for their already nominated candidate heading into their convention and only about 75 days from the election.
August 19, 20241 yr Just now, Gannan said: She's been running for like 2 weeks. She's been running for four years now but if you want to get technical it is since July 21st so one full month.
August 19, 20241 yr 9 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: I know, right? Could you imagine if we elected someone like that? Trump: has a platform, has a record as POTUS Kamala: trust me, bro. Orange Man Bad WGB: "OMG where do I sign up for White Dudes for Kamala??"
Create an account or sign in to comment