August 28, 20241 yr 33 minutes ago, paco said: 1) That's how I picture most members of the circle jerk look like As the #1 pivot man, I’m surprised you can see anything with your eyes pasted shut?
August 28, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: oh good lord, stop getting upset you soyboy. what possible issues could arise from a man with his power, inciting people?
August 28, 20241 yr 7 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said: As the #1 pivot man, I’m surprised you can see anything with your eyes pasted shut?
August 28, 20241 yr 22 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said: As the #1 pivot man, I’m surprised you can see anything with your eyes pasted shut? Sounds like Paco hit a little too close to home here
August 28, 20241 yr Which members of CVON are most likely to be femboys in pink shorts? Probably the ones who post about trannies and their junk the majority of the time.
August 28, 20241 yr 4 hours ago, Boogyman said: Fair, but at the same time if Dems want to toss that out there maybe don't have Clinton with his multiple allegations of assault and misconduct speak at the convention.
August 28, 20241 yr Aside from the upcoming loss to Harris, Trump's line-in-the-sand loyalty test for GOP candidates is shaping up to be a down-ballot disaster for the party. Much like the fear that Biden would poison the chances of dems in senate, house, and gubernatorial races, Trump's actually the one doing that now to his own party and nobody in the GOP seems to notice or care. We've already seen this effect play out in 2018, 2020, and 2022, but it's looking to be even more pronounced now and will presumably continue indefinitely for as long as he has control over the party. (Which he will since he'll lose by a similar to margin to the one he did to Biden 4 years ago and claim it was stolen again.)
August 28, 20241 yr 14 minutes ago, Diehardfan said: Fair, but at the same time if Dems want to toss that out there maybe don't have Clinton with his multiple allegations of assault and misconduct speak at the convention. Agree, but Clinton's not running for anything. He gave a speech. The only two choices are a woman who had consensual sex when she was single and a rapist. And since Trump's obviously gonna keep going after Kamala for having consensual sex when she was single, Kamala's going to rightfully point out that Trump raped a woman (and at some point I'm sure they'll start pointing out that Trump almost certainly raped kids).
August 28, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Aside from the upcoming loss to Harris, Trump's line-in-the-sand loyalty test for GOP candidates is shaping up to be a down-ballot disaster for the party. Much like the fear that Biden would poison the chances of dems in senate, house, and gubernatorial races, Trump's actually the one doing that now to his own party and nobody in the GOP seems to notice or care. We've already seen this effect play out in 2018, 2020, and 2022, but it's looking to be even more pronounced now and will presumably continue indefinitely for as long as he has control over the party. (Which he will since he'll lose by a similar to margin to the one he did to Biden 4 years ago and claim it was stolen again.) Because the whole game is fealty to one man. By design, it diminishes everyone around him, makes them look weak and most people can't win a race from a built in position of weakness. There's literally no way down ballot Reps will ever win in significant numbers as long as Trump's around.
August 28, 20241 yr 22 minutes ago, Diehardfan said: Fair, but at the same time if Dems want to toss that out there maybe don't have Clinton with his multiple allegations of assault and misconduct speak at the convention. This is such crap. We're talking Donnie and Kamala. I'm very confident in putting up Kamala's record, against the guy who cheated on his wives, paid off a porn start using campaign money, and spoke publicly about how cool it is to walk in and see undressed teenagers in pageants. What have got about Kamala, exactly?
August 28, 20241 yr 6 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: Agree, but Clinton's not running for anything. He gave a speech. The only two choices are a woman who had consensual sex when she was single and a rapist. And since Trump's obviously gonna keep going after Kamala for having consensual sex when she was single, Kamala's going to rightfully point out that Trump raped a woman (and at some point I'm sure they'll start pointing out that Trump almost certainly raped kids). As I said that's fair but at the same time don't give someone with his past a slot to speak at her convention
August 28, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, VanHammersly said: There's literally no way down ballot Reps will ever win in significant numbers as long as Trump's around. It would require something major like an act of terrorism on our soil. Not necessarily to the scale of 9/11 but even a boston marathon type attack could flip things. Failing that, yeah they are in real trouble with no way to turn things around.
August 28, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, Diehardfan said: As I said that's fair but at the same time don't give someone with his past a slot to speak at her convention I agree, he hurts more than helps at this point (though he had a good one-liner on jobs.) But I think they really wanted to throw HRC a bone so they probably felt like they were obligated to have him speak too.
August 28, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, Diehardfan said: As I said that's fair but at the same time don't give someone with his past a slot to speak at her convention Even in that case you have an adulterer and a rapist and those aren't the same thing.
August 28, 20241 yr 26 minutes ago, Diehardfan said: Fair, but at the same time if Dems want to toss that out there maybe don't have Clinton with his multiple allegations of assault and misconduct speak at the convention. Yeah, that's was dumb, but I don't watch conventions or any of that crap and I couldn't care less about endorsements. Seems hypocritical but at the same time Clinton was a big and popular figure even after his scandal.
August 28, 20241 yr Just now, Toastrel said: This is such crap. We're talking Donnie and Kamala. I'm very confident in putting up Kamala's record, against the guy who cheated on his wives, paid off a porn start using campaign money, and spoke publicly about how cool it is to walk in and see undressed teenagers in pageants. What have got about Kamala, exactly? Double standard saying we fine giving another a prime speaking role.
August 28, 20241 yr Just now, DrPhilly said: Even in that case you have an adulterer and a rapist and those aren't the same thing. Clinton didn't rape one of the women who accused him or do any of the misconduct allegations either? Ok.
August 28, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, Boogyman said: Yeah, that's was dumb, but I don't watch conventions or any of that crap and I couldn't care less about endorsements. Seems hypocritical but at the same time Clinton was a big and popular figure even after his scandal. Agree. That's all I'm saying. I liked him as president.
August 28, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: I agree, he hurts more than helps at this point (though he had a good one-liner on jobs.) But I think they really wanted to throw HRC a bone so they probably felt like they were obligated to have him speak too. He gave a good talk and I like him. Just saying.
August 28, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, Diehardfan said: Double standard saying we fine giving another a prime speaking role. Presidency > speaking role, just a little bit.
August 28, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said: wait, clinton was a dog, but was he accused of rape? yet? Not rape, but abusing a power dynamic that is often used in hollywood to take advantage of women. It's highly immoral and inappropriate even if it might not have been criminal.
Create an account or sign in to comment