Libtards acting like this is some huge gotcha moment is pretty hilarious. Yes, FEMAs budget needs to be slashed, as do all federal expenditures. Printing around a trillion dollars every 3-4 months isn't sustainable.

Instead, it needs to operate more efficiently for disasters like this one. So no more using funds to fly Haitian rapists into the middle of the country. No more prioritizing DEI initiatives. Just use the money to help people during catastrophic disasters rather than another personal piggy bank to loot american taxpayers.

4 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Libtards acting like this is some huge gotcha moment is pretty hilarious. Yes, FEMAs budget needs to be slashed, as do all federal expenditures. Printing around a trillion dollars every 3-4 months isn't sustainable.

Instead, it needs to operate more efficiently for disasters like this one. So no more using funds to fly Haitian rapists into the middle of the country. No more prioritizing DEI initiatives. Just use the money to help people during catastrophic disasters rather than another personal piggy bank to loot american taxpayers.

See @Diehardfan. This is what your candidate supports. 

6 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

We are done on this until you come to me with a serious conversation. Asking me to give you answers to a hypothetical without knowing the budget details or what would be impacted is laughable. That's like someone asking if one supports cutting ICE's budget by 60%. Well, what are you cutting? What will that impact? It's a joke and disingenuous that you are looking for a conversation.

  You're not running for F'ing office, TryHard.  This isn't a televised debate.  You're answering a question in the political section of a football team's message board.  Just answer it.

1 minute ago, VanHammersly said:

  You're not running for F'ing office, TryHard.  This isn't a televised debate.  You're answering a question in the political section of a football team's message board.  Just answer it.

Not until you come to me with something other than BS. 

6 hours ago, Toastrel said:

Getting the band back together? The crew you pick says everything,.

Diehard and the Supremely Supid

As if the klan you're running with on these boards aren't Fed in the head. 

Your lack of self awareness is astounding.

15 minutes ago, WentzFan11 said:

See @Diehardfan. This is what your candidate supports. 

"To make him the most powerful president ever" 😆

20 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Not until you come to me with something other than BS. 

  It's not gonna make or break the election.  You can do it.

5 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

  It's not gonna make or break the election.  You can do it.

I'm good, but I hope you enjoy your day. 

21 hours ago, Diehardfan said:

So we have Fox and CNN you have ABC and MSNBC. 

I wouldn't say ABC pointing out that killing babies after they're born in blue states is an absurd lie, means they are "in the tank" for Harris. 

8 minutes ago, Gannan said:

I wouldn't say ABC pointing out that killing babies after they're born in blue states is an absurd lie, means they are "in the tank" for Harris. 

I'd say the fact they ignored fact checking her on the combat zone comment and Charlottesville doesn't help their cause. We've all heard the even Snopes said that was BS line. 

2 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

I'd say the fact they ignored fact checking her on the combat zone comment and Charlottesville doesn't help their cause. We've all heard the even Snopes said that was BS line. 

I'm sick of hearing the Charlottesville thing. There were NSDAPs with tiki torches on one side, and protestors on the other. Trump said there were very fine people on both sides. The 2 statements I just made are undisputed fact. You can try to tie yourself into a pretzel making the argument that Trump meant people other than NSDAPs were good people trying to keep confederate monuments up.... but its a hugggggge stretch. The killing babies after their born thing is just an absurd lie with not even a shred of truth to it. They are not the same. 

23 minutes ago, Gannan said:

I'm sick of hearing the Charlottesville thing. There were NSDAPs with tiki torches on one side, and protestors on the other. Trump said there were very fine people on both sides. The 2 statements I just made are undisputed fact. You can try to tie yourself into a pretzel making the argument that Trump meant people other than NSDAPs were good people trying to keep confederate monuments up.... but its a hugggggge stretch. The killing babies after their born thing is just an absurd lie with not even a shred of truth to it. They are not the same. 

Well, you need to get past it when even Snopes calls BS on it. So it is actually disputed and fake news. 

 

 

15 minutes ago, Gannan said:

I'm sick of hearing the Charlottesville thing. There were NSDAPs with tiki torches on one side, and protestors on the other. Trump said there were very fine people on both sides. The 2 statements I just made are undisputed fact. You can try to tie yourself into a pretzel making the argument that Trump meant people other than NSDAPs were good people trying to keep confederate monuments up.... but its a hugggggge stretch. The killing babies after their born thing is just an absurd lie with not even a shred of truth to it. They are not the same. 

Honestly the Charlottesville thing is a great litmus test for determining who has irreparable brain damage from TDS and who is salvageable. You just failed, of course. Obviously there were people who were protesting the statue's removal who weren't neo-NSDAPs. And Trump even explicitly condemned the NSDAPs that were there. Even libtard-run fact check sites concede all that. 

So basically anyone who still pushes that nonsense is to the left of sites like snopes and therefore completely mentally ill.

9 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Well, you need to get past it when even Snopes calls BS on it. So it is actually disputed and fake news. 

 

 

What part of what I said are you claiming was incorrect? Are you trying to say they guys with torches shouting "Jews will not replace us" are not NSDAPs or are you saying we all saw a mass hallucination when we saw Trump go on TV and say "There were very fine people on both sides"

5 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Honestly the Charlottesville thing is a great litmus test for determining who has irreparable brain damage from TDS and who is salvageable. You just failed, of course. Obviously there were people who were protesting the statue's removal who weren't neo-NSDAPs. And Trump even explicitly condemned the NSDAPs that were there. Even libtard-run fact check sites concede all that. 

So basically anyone who still pushes that nonsense is to the left of sites like snopes and therefore completely mentally ill.

So you are going with "The guys carrying torches screaming "Blood and Soil" and "Jews will not replace us" are not NSDAPs....

4 minutes ago, Gannan said:

What part of what I said are you claiming was incorrect? Are you trying to say they guys with torches shouting "Jews will not replace us" are not NSDAPs or are you saying we all saw a mass hallucination when we saw Trump go on TV and say "There were very fine people on both sides"

The part attributed to Trump is fake news according to even Snopes 

Just now, Gannan said:

So you are going with "The guys carrying torches screaming "Blood and Soil" and "Jews will not replace us" are not NSDAPs....

You are literally too stupid to argue with on this topic.  

"hurrr durrr you're saying the people with swastikas tatooed all over their faces weren't neo NSDAPs right?"

Uh no, moron. I'm saying there were other people there besides neo NSDAPs. Which is obviously true, well-documented, even common sense, etc. You just have to play the part of a complete idiot to misunderstand this point so you can keep your retarded little narrative alive.  

3 minutes ago, Gannan said:

So you are going with "The guys carrying torches screaming "Blood and Soil" and "Jews will not replace us" are not NSDAPs....

Stay on that island, then, I guess. 

1 minute ago, Diehardfan said:

The part attributed to Trump is fake news according to even Snopes 

So you are going with mass hallucination. Interesting. So you are saying this is either AI, or this is a mirage? Which is it?

 

3 minutes ago, Kz! said:

You are literally too stupid to argue with on this topic.  

"hurrr durrr you're saying the people with swastikas tatooed all over their faces weren't neo NSDAPs right?"

Uh no, moron. I'm saying there were other people there besides neo NSDAPs. Which is obviously true, well-documented, even common sense, etc. You just have to play the part of a complete idiot to misunderstand this point so you can keep your retarded little narrative alive.  

So you are saying that there were people marching with NSDAPs, chanting with the NSDAPs, fighting for the same cause as the NSDAPs, but somehow they aren't NSDAPs and are fine people? Do I have that right? 

1 minute ago, Gannan said:

So you are saying

Anytime a post starts like this I know utter idiocy is about to follow. Post did not disappoint.  

10 minutes ago, Gannan said:

So you are going with "The guys carrying torches screaming "Blood and Soil" and "Jews will not replace us" are not NSDAPs....

No, no, no, you don't get it.  He was talking about the people that were there to support the guys with torches screaming "blood and soil" and "Jews will not replace us".  Totally different. 

7 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:

Stay on that island, then, I guess. 

  Self awareness isn't your strong suit

Just now, Kz! said:

Anytime a post starts like this I know utter idiocy is about to follow. Post did not disappoint.  

You tell me which ones are NSDAPs and which ones are the very fine people. I'm thankful I have you here to tell me which is which

6 minutes ago, Gannan said:

So you are going with mass hallucination. Interesting. So you are saying this is either AI, or this is a mirage? Which is it?

 

Ask the left leaning Snopes cause even they aren't on your side on this one