7 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

They should just play the second string.  

Both games are at the same time.  I'm sure both teams will be score board watching.   Depends on how the games are going honestly.  

2 hours ago, bpac55 said:

I'm not sure what to make of this but on defense, the leading tacklers are as follows:

Reed Blankenship- 74 solo, 108 total

Nick Morrow- 59 solo, 84 total 

Zack Cunningham- 52 solo, 80 total (in 12 games)

Kevin Byard- 43 solo, 66 total (in 9 games)

Darius Slay- 48 solo, 57 total (in 12 game)

James Bradberry- 36 solo, 50 total 

Sydney Brown- 32 solo, 45 total (in 13 games, 0 starts)

Josh Sweat- 30, 43 total

Not sure how normal or not this is but for starters, it doesn't seem like the Eagles as a team are making a lot of tackles despite them being on the field so much. Second, should the leading tackler from the DL be so low on the list?

I think some of it has to do with injuries. It does speak to the problems at LB. I mean Alex Singleton is near the top of the League in solo tackles.  He was trash but still better than anything on the team now.  

6 minutes ago, KINGnabb said:

Both games are at the same time.  I'm sure both teams will be score board watching.   Depends on how the games are going honestly.  

No, I insist that they start Tanner McKee on Sunday.  

The coaches will go before AJ does, Howie isn’t (edited) stupid.

AJ is a top 5 wr in his prime, not only that most fans are going to side with AJ. This isn’t AJ vs Hurts this is AJ vs a fraud ass OC.

38 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

It's not about moral high ground.  Rodgers accused him of being a pedophile. There are a bunch of crazies that will threaten people they think are on that list.  Kimmel is alleging his family was threatened.   I don't think Rodgers has a good faith basis to make the claim against Kimmel.  I think Rodgers doesn't believe the claim.  I hope Kimmel does sue him. 

 

When I read the quote, I thought that and cringed. When I heard it, Rodgers was a bit sly with how he said it. and clearly did it to troll Kimmel .What Rodgers was implying is the late night talk show couches will be a little empty once that list comes out.  And we all know why.

Perhaps Kimmel and late night colleagues shouldn't have gone so hard on Rodgers about his vaccination status. 

 

1 minute ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 

 

 

Sounds more like speculative analysis instead of what Adam is actually hearing.

53 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

It's not about moral high ground.  Rodgers accused him of being a pedophile. There are a bunch of crazies that will threaten people they think are on that list.  Kimmel is alleging his family was threatened.   I don't think Rodgers has a good faith basis to make the claim against Kimmel.  I think Rodgers doesn't believe the claim.  I hope Kimmel does sue him. 

 

Kimmel is the biggest cry baby loser.  No validity on his claims of his family being threatened.  Guy was wishing the deaths of people who didn't grt the covid vaccine, he's a POS.

59 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

It's not about moral high ground.  Rodgers accused him of being a pedophile. There are a bunch of crazies that will threaten people they think are on that list.  Kimmel is alleging his family was threatened.   I don't think Rodgers has a good faith basis to make the claim against Kimmel.  I think Rodgers doesn't believe the claim.  I hope Kimmel does sue him. 

 

It's a bad look for sure, even if he meant it as a joke. He should and maybe does know better.

1 hour ago, NCiggles said:

He's been up and down.  His footwork was poor on the TD he gave up on Sunday.  At other times, he looks like he's the only CB that can drive on the ball and make a tackle. I haven't seen him get beat deep.  I think he's shown enough upside to warrant starting him next season.  

He's certainly gotten beat deep... thankfully a sack saved him.

59 minutes ago, Swoop said:

Who else wants to bet the AJ Brown situation will be a nothing burger?

I'm sure of it. I'm sure Howie and Nick had conversation with AJ that went something like this:

Nick: You're a team captain, you need to speak to the media.

Howie: Everyone thinks you have an issue with the coaching.

AJ: I do....I told you that privately already.

Howie: Yes, but that's not a helpful image for this organization. You need to think about how other organizations you may want to play for are viewing this situation. We're thinking of you're future.

AJ: So what am I suppose to say?

Howie: Here's some suggestions Mr. Lurie, myself and Nick came up with. We highly suggest you seriously consider them when you speak to the media.

11 hours ago, ToastJenkins said:

What tree would he be considered part of?

and swag means nothing. Gimme a nerdy genius like the lions OC or the miami coach any day.

I don’t want a nerdy genius on defense we already have 2 of them who clearly think defense is played without passion and intensity. Gimme a grimy swaggy dude with some dawg in him

11 hours ago, LeanMeanGM said:

What if….

Dawkins for DC. 

Whoa

Maybe if he’d been coaching for a minute. 

Antonio Pierce if Raiders don’t do the smart thing

I think fans just have to support AJ and everything will be okay. 
 

him and Smitty each have just 1 Target per game over the last 8 over 25 yards. That’s grotesque.

Did I miss it?   Has AJ broken his silence?  

Rodgers didn't imply anything regarding Kimmel - just said Kimmel doesn't want the list to come out.  He probably doesn't - he's probably pals with half the freaks on there.  F Kimmel and the rest of those d-bags.  

33 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

Kimmel is the biggest cry baby loser.  No validity on his claims of his family being threatened.  Guy was wishing the deaths of people who didn't grt the covid vaccine, he's a POS.

Stealing my line 😀

13 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Did I miss it?   Has AJ broken his silence?  

Yes. He said "Meet me in my driveway, I've got sit-ups I need to do."

It's over.

I support this 100%. I'd even go a step further and say they should still have Super Bowls there.

 

6 minutes ago, bpac55 said:

I support this 100%. I'd even go a step further and say they should still have Super Bowls there.

 

The local tax revenue from hosting a Superbowl is estimated at $10-$20 million. With the investment that municipalities make in stadiums, I think it would be a hard pill to swallow if one location became the venue. Also, seating at Rose Bowl stinks. It is an old fashioned stadium with low sloping stands and no jumbotron vs the newer high sloped stands that provide much better viewing both on the field and via technology. 

I hate watching Super Bowls and National titles played in domes. It just takes the atmosphere out of it for me.

12 minutes ago, Sack that QB said:

I hate watching Super Bowls and National titles played in domes. It just takes the atmosphere out of it for me.

Banned

18 minutes ago, Next_Up said:

The local tax revenue from hosting a Superbowl is estimated at $10-$20 million. With the investment that municipalities make in stadiums, I think it would be a hard pill to swallow if one location became the venue. Also, seating at Rose Bowl stinks. It is an old fashioned stadium with low sloping stands and no jumbotron vs the newer high sloped stands that provide much better viewing both on the field and via technology. 

I know but it's just such a gorgeous venue from a TV perspective. I just love watching the Rose Bowl and watching the sky change there. I know the money is the and impact from hosting is hugely important and all of the other factors. I'm just and old school guy. The Fiesta Bowl was inside in a dull atmosphere when it used to be outside in an absolutely perfect outdoor setting. Domes just feel so dull and lifeless. Any game in Atlanta you have some of the worst interior lighting around. LA and Dallas are plugged in to host a lot and again, they just feel dull. Just would love to see them utilize outdoor stadiums with natural grass, especially in warmer climates where you don't need a dome.