2 minutes ago, Sack that QB said:

Niners will lose at least one more game we’ll see if the Eagles take care of business on their end 

Be willing to make an avatar bet that the win out. Got at Az, vs. Baltimore, at Washington and vs. rams. If Baltimore doesn’t knock them off they are winning out. 

 

Just now, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Be willing to make an avatar bet that the win out. Got at Az, vs. Baltimore, at Washington and vs. rams. If Baltimore doesn’t knock them off they are winning out. 

The rams didn't look too bad today and its a divisional game.

2 minutes ago, UK Eagle said:

Ertz would make an impact on this team very quickly.  He may not be at his physical prime, but would offer quality snaps

Doubt it moves the needle on wins though. A 4th option isnt a difference. Maybe in red zone…

SEATTLE NOT DEAD YET

1 minute ago, pisceschica said:

The rams didn't look too bad today and its a divisional game.

It’s at home and rams if they don’t have anything to play for might sit Stafford. And they are on the bad side of a ton of tiebreaker scenarios 

I’d love to be wrong. This game and Baltimore are the two games i think can have an upset. But means seattle has to get stops and put together another scoring drive 

Just now, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

It’s at home and rams if they don’t have anything to play for might sit Stafford. 

Well they are at home against seattle's qb in his first start and they're not dominating this game. 

Just now, ToastJenkins said:

Doubt it moves the needle on wins though. A 4th option isnt a difference. Maybe in red zone…

Come playoff time, I think that is where we'd see him make more of an impact.  Esp if Goedert gets injured again

td seattle

Would love to try that play with Godert!

bums went for 2 

Great play by Seattle.

10 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said:

Disagree 

ertz is optimally used as the move F tight end. Goedert is the Y

Yea we’ve seen that movie already though.

4 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Be willing to make an avatar bet that the win out. Got at Az, vs. Baltimore, at Washington and vs. rams. If Baltimore doesn’t knock them off they are winning out. 

Not gonna happen. They will have ended the season winning 8 or 9 in a row at that point and they aren’t good enough to accomplish that feat

5 minutes ago, pisceschica said:

Well they are at home against seattle's qb in his first start and they're not dominating this game. 

You knew they were gonna have an emotional letdown after their Super Bowl last week. No way they were gonna match the intensity they had against the eagles. And yet still up 21-16 and driving again. Also drew lock has started before. Before being traded to seattle l, he was a starter for the broncos. 

 

1 minute ago, Sack that QB said:

Not gonna happen. They will have ended the season winning 8 or 9 in a row at that point and they aren’t good enough to accomplish that feat

They did it last year lol  they won 10 in a row last year to end the regular season. 

1 hour ago, Parrot Head said:

Queue up my recent rant about Penny.

I refuse to believe this team is serious about running the ball until penny is activated. IDGAF about his blocking, there is no way penny can't be the THIRD BACK. He is a far superior runner to gainwell and scott, it's infuriating.

Has there ever been a scorigomi of 0-0? Cause I’m really pulling for it in this raiders-Vikings game 

4 minutes ago, devpool said:

I refuse to believe this team is serious about running the ball until penny is activated. IDGAF about his blocking, there is no way penny can't be the THIRD BACK. He is a far superior runner to gainwell and scott, it's infuriating.

Yes, I feel the same way.  

 

Need to run the ball tonight though.   And they won't.  

9 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

Yea we’ve seen that movie already though.

People are too nostalgic about Ertz IMO

5 minutes ago, devpool said:

I refuse to believe this team is serious about running the ball until penny is activated. IDGAF about his blocking, there is no way penny can't be the THIRD BACK. He is a far superior runner to gainwell and scott, it's infuriating.

Run game was pretty dominant when we had Jurgens and Goedert out there. Just gotta make the calls

Fing Seattle…

2 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Has there ever been a scorigomi of 0-0? Cause I’m really pulling for it in this raiders-Vikings game 

A bunch... 73, apparently.  But the last one was in 1943... and involved (of course) the Lions.  80 years since the last one.

1 minute ago, Iggles_Phan said:

A bunch... 73, apparently.  But the last one was in 1943... and involved (of course) the Lions.  80 years since the last one.

I guess it makes sense that it would be like 80 years ago and the lions lol 

Im cheering for 2-0 or 3-2