June 5, 20205 yr that's freaking insane. people are morons. I love that meme though .... going to send it to my mom. she won't like it.
June 5, 20205 yr 41 minutes ago, toolg said: This is insane. A family of 4 going on a camping trip found themselves stuck in a small, flung Washington town. Some gun nut posted nonsense about Antifa coming to loot their remote town. "Seven or eight carloads" of his friends surround this family in a parking lot, harass them out of town, only some of the nutters cut down some trees, barricading the roads. Cops make the gun dealer take down his BS posts, so naturally he claims he's the victim in this. It's especially stupid considering https://www.ajc.com/news/fbi-finds-evidence-antifa-involvement-national-unrest/qVI3U9wb8Q6u1QEvVsJ7AJ/ Quote The FBI has found no evidence that the American militant anti-fascist movement Antifa was involved in violence that erupted during national protests over the death of George Floyd.
June 5, 20205 yr 1 hour ago, toolg said: This is insane. A family of 4 going on a camping trip found themselves stuck in a small, flung Washington town. Some gun nut posted nonsense about Antifa coming to loot their remote town. "Seven or eight carloads" of his friends surround this family in a parking lot, harass them out of town, only some of the nutters cut down some trees, barricading the roads. Cops make the gun dealer take down his BS posts, so naturally he claims he's the victim in this. Nice try, Cullens'. Not this time.
June 5, 20205 yr 47 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: It's especially stupid considering https://www.ajc.com/news/fbi-finds-evidence-antifa-involvement-national-unrest/qVI3U9wb8Q6u1QEvVsJ7AJ/ pfft, FBI is part of the deep state. wake up sheeple!
June 5, 20205 yr 48 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: It's especially stupid considering https://www.ajc.com/news/fbi-finds-evidence-antifa-involvement-national-unrest/qVI3U9wb8Q6u1QEvVsJ7AJ/ it's waaaay to late for facts. cheeto already said it was antifa. barr said it was antifa. so for the low info, fake news consuming trumpbots, it was antifa, dammit.
June 5, 20205 yr On 6/4/2020 at 2:07 PM, mayanh8 said: I knew those cops were deep state operatives.
June 5, 20205 yr Despite broad support, Rand Paul holds up anti-lynching bill There have been nearly 200 attempts in Congress to approve anti-lynching legislation. Rand Paul is standing in the way of the latest bipartisan effort. Over the last several decades, there have been nearly 200 attempts in Congress to approve anti-lynching legislation. Each failed. In late 2018, the Senate finally passed a bipartisan measure, but the Republican-led House didn't advance it before the end of the 115th Congress. In February 2019, the stage was finally set. The federal anti-lynching legislation was introduced by the Senate's three African-American members -- Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Tim Scott (R-S.C.) -- and it passed unanimously. The bill then went to the House, which passed it by a margin of 410 to 4. The House did, however, make one symbolic tweak to the legislation: the Democratic-led chamber renamed the bill the Emmett Till Anti-Lynching Act, as a way to honor the memory of the 14-year-old young man who was lynched in Mississippi in 1955. That minor change meant the Senate would have to pass the bill one last time. That was supposed to happen yesterday. It didn't. Right off the bat, the Kentucky Republican's timing could be better. Rand Paul, at least for now, blocked the anti-lynching bill in the midst of a national outcry of racial injustices. In fact, just yesterday, as the GOP senator quarreled with Booker and Harris over the proper legal definition of "lynching," the memorial service was underway of George Floyd, who died after a police officer kneeled on his neck for almost nine minutes. Making matters just a bit worse, Rand Paul isn't the ideal messenger for the message: ahead of his Senate election in 2010, the former ophthalmologist raised objections to a key element of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. But the Republican senator did it anyway, apparently indifferent to appearances and unmoved by the arguments from Booker and Harris. Paul wants changes to the language of the bipartisan bill; the measure's sponsors believe the text is fine as-is. How can one member hold up a bill that already enjoys broad support? As a procedural matter, Harris and Booker yesterday were trying to advance their bill through unanimous consent -- a common tactic for approving uncontroversial legislation with broad support. The problem, of course, is that it allows just one member to stand in the way. In theory, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R), Paul's Kentucky colleague, could schedule a floor vote and pass the anti-lynching bill the usual way, but Politico reported yesterday, "GOP leaders currently have no plans to devote floor time to the bill." As for what happens now, no one's altogether sure. Maybe McConnell will bring the legislation to the floor; maybe Rand Paul will end his blockade; maybe the anti-lynching bill could be added as an amendment to some other bill; or maybe the latest in a series of related efforts going back decades will meet the same fate as the other the anti-lynching proposals, simply because of one man.
June 5, 20205 yr 1 minute ago, bobeph said: Wait, so lynchings are actually legal right now? yeah, totally.
June 5, 20205 yr Just now, mr_hunt said: yeah, totally. Wish I knew that already. I’ve got a sheet ton of catching up to do. Starting with the priest who touched my butthole in 7th grade.
June 5, 20205 yr 7 minutes ago, bobeph said: Wait, so lynchings are actually legal right now? Federally? It's no different than murder, which is handled locally. Obviously you can't lynch someone and use the lack of a lynching law to get away with no punishment. But for over 100 years people in this country have been trying to get anti-lynching legislation passed that would distinguish it from any your "run of the mill" murders and allow the feds to finally prosecute it rather than relying on the local (often racist) jurisdictions in which they occurred.
June 5, 20205 yr 4 minutes ago, bobeph said: Wish I knew that already. I’ve got a sheet ton of catching up to do. Starting with the priest who touched my butthole in 7th grade. he made you the man you are today.
June 5, 20205 yr 17 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: Despite broad support, Rand Paul holds up anti-lynching bill There have been nearly 200 attempts in Congress to approve anti-lynching legislation. Rand Paul is standing in the way of the latest bipartisan effort. Over the last several decades, there have been nearly 200 attempts in Congress to approve anti-lynching legislation. Each failed. In late 2018, the Senate finally passed a bipartisan measure, but the Republican-led House didn't advance it before the end of the 115th Congress. In February 2019, the stage was finally set. The federal anti-lynching legislation was introduced by the Senate's three African-American members -- Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Tim Scott (R-S.C.) -- and it passed unanimously. The bill then went to the House, which passed it by a margin of 410 to 4. The House did, however, make one symbolic tweak to the legislation: the Democratic-led chamber renamed the bill the Emmett Till Anti-Lynching Act, as a way to honor the memory of the 14-year-old young man who was lynched in Mississippi in 1955. That minor change meant the Senate would have to pass the bill one last time. That was supposed to happen yesterday. It didn't. Right off the bat, the Kentucky Republican's timing could be better. Rand Paul, at least for now, blocked the anti-lynching bill in the midst of a national outcry of racial injustices. In fact, just yesterday, as the GOP senator quarreled with Booker and Harris over the proper legal definition of "lynching," the memorial service was underway of George Floyd, who died after a police officer kneeled on his neck for almost nine minutes. Making matters just a bit worse, Rand Paul isn't the ideal messenger for the message: ahead of his Senate election in 2010, the former ophthalmologist raised objections to a key element of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. But the Republican senator did it anyway, apparently indifferent to appearances and unmoved by the arguments from Booker and Harris. Paul wants changes to the language of the bipartisan bill; the measure's sponsors believe the text is fine as-is. How can one member hold up a bill that already enjoys broad support? As a procedural matter, Harris and Booker yesterday were trying to advance their bill through unanimous consent -- a common tactic for approving uncontroversial legislation with broad support. The problem, of course, is that it allows just one member to stand in the way. In theory, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R), Paul's Kentucky colleague, could schedule a floor vote and pass the anti-lynching bill the usual way, but Politico reported yesterday, "GOP leaders currently have no plans to devote floor time to the bill." As for what happens now, no one's altogether sure. Maybe McConnell will bring the legislation to the floor; maybe Rand Paul will end his blockade; maybe the anti-lynching bill could be added as an amendment to some other bill; or maybe the latest in a series of related efforts going back decades will meet the same fate as the other the anti-lynching proposals, simply because of one man. Rand Paul never fails to use his Libertarian powers for evil.
June 5, 20205 yr 46 minutes ago, mr_hunt said: he made you the man you are today. He hurt my then virgin butthole.
June 6, 20205 yr Author Outing is brutal; however, when someone so blatantly and overtly homophobic is about to get outed, it’s still pretty brutal (with a crack of a smile)
June 6, 20205 yr https://www.businessinsider.com/unidentified-prison-agents-patrol-dc-amid-protests-curfew-2020-6 Heavily armed men who refuse to identify themselves are patrolling the streets of Washington, DC. They were sent by the Bureau of Prisons. I am sure this is really Obama's fault. He's the one making America into a police state, he's the one threatening our Freedoms. I thank God for President Trump. BEST EVER!
June 6, 20205 yr K-Pop stans took over QAnon hashtags on Twitter and QAnon went more bat sh** crazy than normal accusing K-Pop fans of actually being Soros warfare assets deployed against Trump.
June 7, 20205 yr 8 hours ago, mayanh8 said: K-Pop stans took over QAnon hashtags on Twitter and QAnon went more bat sh** crazy than normal accusing K-Pop fans of actually being Soros warfare assets deployed against Trump. I mean if Soros is truly able to unite/manipulate KPop fans, Mexican immigrants, most doctors and scientists, most elected officials, protestors, cops, many black trauma actors, and a gaggle of gay prostitutes tweeting out "Lady G", I feel as if we should just let him run the country. Dude gets sheet done.
Create an account or sign in to comment