I'd be happy with either Texans or Ravens winning both this game and the Super Bowl.  Should be a great one.  I hope the Packers can keep the game tonight close and not a blowout.  

6 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

I don’t believe so since it would be a promotion to playcaller. 

That seems weird since Nick could just take it back at anytime he wants 

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

That seems weird since Nick could just take it back at anytime he wants 

I’m sure Steichen ain’t worried about that. 

1 minute ago, LeanMeanGM said:

That seems weird since Nick could just take it back at anytime he wants 

Nick doesn't want it back.  He's scared of it.

2 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

I’m sure Steichen ain’t worried about that. 

I meant more in a general sense. It’s an easy and obvious loophole to get around teams blocking. 

Pay attention to Aikman’s eyes. They are still white. Wait until he talks in the second half. The edible has kicked in and eyes are red. 

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

I meant more in a general sense. It’s an easy and obvious loophole to get around teams blocking. 

I guess. But teams just aren’t going to act in bad faith like that. 

This Jim Bob Cooter news is exciting.  Not sure if Lurie will be able to pass that up.  

This is nothing against JBC, but if that's Sirianni's answer I'm out.

8 minutes ago, Wentz_Era said:

Short memory then…

Yea must be, there is no way they had the success they had last year by avoiding the middle of the field. There just isn't.

Just now, Khani1 said:

Pay attention to Aikman eyes. They are still white. Wait until he talks in the second half. The edible has kicked in and eyes are red. 

 

I'll look for this and try to go on the same journey as Troy.  

15 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

I don’t believe so since it would be a promotion to playcaller. 

Is that an actual NFL team title? 

3 minutes ago, RLC said:

This is nothing against JBC, but if that's Sirianni's answer I'm out.

I’m open to the idea. It certainly would freshen up the scheme. 

Cooter would mean Lurie still believes in Sirianni’s scheme, which would be troubling. They need an entire scheme overhaul not just patchwork or a different play caller.

1 minute ago, Sack that QB said:

Cooter would mean Lurie still believes in Sirianni’s scheme, which would be troubling. They need an entire scheme overhaul not just patchwork or a different play caller.

Or Lurie wants Steichen's scheme. 

Look at that, a team that can beat the blitz

Fire Nick, hire Monken as HC and have him call the plays 

18 minutes ago, devpool said:

Yea must be, there is no way they had the success they had last year by avoiding the middle of the field. There just isn't.

Well they weren’t below 5% or whatever the stat was…but they’ve been pretty allergic to it since Nick got here.

14 minutes ago, RLC said:

This is nothing against JBC, but if that's Sirianni's answer I'm out.

Same, I don't think I can support this organization going forward if this is their solution. 

Obviously they're not serious about winning, so why should I invest my time and energy into a sub-par product?

May just focus on my AFC team going forward...

26 minutes ago, RLC said:

This is nothing against JBC, but if that's Sirianni's answer I'm out.

Why? Cooter has a strong resume

11 minutes ago, Birdman said:

May just focus on my AFC team going forward...

I see this on my timeline fairly regularly. 

Wish we’d drafted Hamilton 

1 hour ago, Saltpeter said:

 

If Sirianni really pitched Jim Bob Cooter, Lurie wtf are you doing man

That’s just Garafolo throwing a name out.  That isn’t anything concrete at all 

8 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

What’s that from? Driving me crazy that I can’t place it.