6 hours ago, Original Sin said:

I still think long term TJ Tampa is the CB I prefer overall 

I like Tampa a lot in R2.

2 hours ago, ManuManu said:

Lol, Schefter careying water for Bienemy’s agent. The guy didn’t even get an interview. No reason to even include him. 

Schefter's Tweets are beholden to the Rooney Rule as well.

Have liked Bullard's game all through his college career. He's a day 1 plug and play slot CB IMO.

 

3 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

Forget to log out of the Randon Regular account?

I was thinking the exact same thing.

1 hour ago, RememberTheKoy said:

Hurts will dominate this tonight 

 

 

 

You know the pro bowl has become a joke when Gardner Minshew is who they have bring in to fill out their roster.

6 minutes ago, Outlaw said:

I like Tampa a lot in R2.

Schefter's Tweets are beholden to the Rooney Rule as well.

Tampa sounds like a great match for our scheme playing off the LOS and having the burst to play the ball in front of you.  But can also flip hips and run.

I said it the other day , but I really like Estime , that said the way the league values RBs , he won’t get drafted until day 3 

1 minute ago, we_gotta_believe said:

You know the pro bowl has become a joke when Gardner Minshew is who they have bring in to fill out their roster.

Nah, by comparison Minshew was deserving of the honor.   Look at Tyler Huntley, who made the Pro Bowl in 2022 after just FOUR starts.  He threw TWO TDs and THREE INTs.  

At least Minshew started 13 games, had a positive TD-INT ratio and exceeded 700 yards passing.   Such a pathetic joke of a mess the Pro Bowl is.   Least meaningful All-Star game of any sport... which is a tall feat.

 

2 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

Tampa sounds like a great match for our scheme playing off the LOS and having the burst to play the ball in front of you.  But can also flip hips and run.

Yes, he's very strong in zone and off-man. And he won't get burnt deep with his stride length and wingspan. He's a solid grab at 50 or 53.

5 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

You know the pro bowl has become a joke when Gardner Minshew is who they have bring in to fill out their roster.

Better than last year when Tyler Huntley went, at least. 

Just now, Outlaw said:

Yes, he's very strong in zone and off-man. And he won't get burnt deep with his stride length and wingspan. He's a solid grab at 50 or 53.

Him and Hart are likely the best options if we don't land one in round 1.

 

2 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Nah, by comparison Minshew was deserving of the honor.   Look at Tyler Huntley, who made the Pro Bowl in 2022 after just FOUR starts.  He threw TWO TDs and THREE INTs.  

At least Minshew started 13 games, had a positive TD-INT ratio and exceeded 700 yards passing.   Such a pathetic joke of a mess the Pro Bowl is.   Least meaningful All-Star game of any sport... which is a tall feat.

 

Didn't realize Huntley made it last year, after only 4 starts. That's even dumber.

3 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 

Not terrible, definitely better than what we had. He doesn't bring much speed to the position though. I'm only lukewarm on this idea. 

1 minute ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Didn't realize Huntley made it last year, after only 4 starts. That's even dumber.

Most definitely.  Only appeared in 6 games.   ~650 yards passing!    

1 hour ago, Mike030270 said:

We finally have 2 top receivers after how many years and media wants drama so they suggest we trade 1 of them 

It's not like either of them had bad years or contributed to the problems on offense.  

15 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 

Depends what he wants and what the plan is for Smith. No way they give Smith a huge extension, still have AJ Brown on a $100M deal AND give significant resources for WR3. We'll probably be in the FA bargain bin and draft a guy. 

happy about dan quinn 

Mr. 28-3 also Mr. 41-16

How many Howie's?

1 hour ago, Mike030270 said:

We finally have 2 top receivers after how many years and media wants drama so they suggest we trade 1 of them 

F the media. Always starting something with their fake news.

34 minutes ago, Outlaw said:

I like Tampa a lot in R2.

Schefter's Tweets are beholden to the Rooney Rule as well.

I thought he interviewed for Washington HC

5 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Depends what he wants and what the plan is for Smith. No way they give Smith a huge extension, still have AJ Brown on a $100M deal AND give significant resources for WR3. We'll probably be in the FA bargain bin and draft a guy. 

Yeah bout to pay Smitty... likely a rookie and a cheap vet FA are on the horizon 

5 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Depends what he wants and what the plan is for Smith. No way they give Smith a huge extension, still have AJ Brown on a $100M deal AND give significant resources for WR3. We'll probably be in the FA bargain bin and draft a guy. 

I’m assuming they draft someone round 3-5 and sign a cheap veteran who’s trying to win a SB. 

14 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 

I know the blog is obsessed about upgrading the 3rd WR slot but I think it's a misuse of resources.  Even if a 3rd WR took all of the targets from Quez, Julio and Zaccheus, you're talking about 36 receptions on 60 targets.  Boyd had 81 targets last season.  I just don't think adding a more talented 3rd WR is going to change the amount of targets.  If you use Boyd's catch percentage and yards per reception replacing Quez, Julio and Zaccheus, his production would be 40 catches for 448 yards.  I just don't see the value added given the investment.  

3 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

I know the blog is obsessed about upgrading the 3rd WR slot but I think it's a misuse of resources.  Even if a 3rd WR took all of the targets from Quez, Julio and Zaccheus, you're talking about 36 receptions on 60 targets.  Boyd had 81 targets last season.  I just don't think adding a more talented 3rd WR is going to change the amount of targets.  If you use Boyd's catch percentage and yards per reception replacing Quez, Julio and Zaccheus, his production would be 40 catches for 448 yards.  I just don't see the value added given the investment.  

That's not very Kool of you

3 minutes ago, NCiggles said:

I know the blog is obsessed about upgrading the 3rd WR slot but I think it's a misuse of resources.  Even if a 3rd WR took all of the targets from Quez, Julio and Zaccheus, you're talking about 36 receptions on 60 targets.  Boyd had 81 targets last season.  I just don't think adding a more talented 3rd WR is going to change the amount of targets.  If you use Boyd's catch percentage and yards per reception replacing Quez, Julio and Zaccheus, his production would be 40 catches for 448 yards.  I just don't see the value added given the investment.  

They 100% need to find a reliable WR3. Bringing in a guy like Tyler Boyd is silly. Like you said, it's all about the targets. Boyd averaged 65 catches/year with the Bengals. 

Zaccheaus had 10 catches in 2023. Zach Pascal had 15 in 2022. Until they change how they use WR3, bringing in a top veteran doesn't make sense.

I think Van Jefferson is the perfect WR3 to bring in and then add some juice in the draft.