4 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

yeah.

But the other question is, can they just keep Sweat, and Reddick? Huff didnt get a gigantic 100M dollar contract. Its a sizeable deal but not outrageous to pay a 3rd pass rusher if he provides elite production in his time on the field. 

The eagles NEVER have an elite rusher that holds up to a full time workload

Trent Cole wore down. Brandon Graham's biggest seasons came when he wasnt playing a ton of snaps anymore. Cox played best when he was spelled. Sweat wore down this year playing a ton. Jalen Carter and Jordan Davis wore down this year. It goes on and on.

If Huff wears down with 900 snaps, hes like every other pass rusher we have ever had.

I agree with this. Our #1 goal based off of philosophy is rush the passer. Why not load up?

Surprised he left Minnesota. Had Jefferson and Addison.

 

I guess now he gets Kyle Pitts and bijan but I couldn't tell you who their receivers are 

3 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

And just never play Nolan Smith again? 

he can also rotate in. why not?

Next question:

Since SF is looking for EDGEs, would you trade Sweat to SF for #31?

Just now, UK_EaglesFan89 said:

Not up against the best OK there is he…

I. Don’t. Care. 

Just now, tuffstuff07 said:

Surprised he left Minnesota. Had Jefferson and Addison.

 

I guess now he gets Kyle Pitts and bijan but I couldn't tell you who their receivers are 

Drake London 

How can anyone be mad about the Huff pick up?

I'm not a believer in Cousins with his age and injury. Think Falcons stay irrelevant 

2 minutes ago, DawkinsOwnage03 said:

ATL gonna draft Bowers 

Give up on Pitts? 

Last 3 first round picks 

Pitts, London, Robinson 

Just now, Sack that QB said:

Next question:

Since SF is looking for EDGEs, would you trade Sweat to SF for #31?

100%

We're not getting a 1 for Sweat. I'm worried we'd only get a 3.

Just now, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Drake London 

Yep forgot about him. I knew they had someone 

 

Just now, Sack that QB said:

Next question:

Since SF is looking for EDGEs, would you trade Sweat to SF for #31?

Sure. Then run at him repeatedly when we play them.

3 minutes ago, RLC said:

 

please someone take him off our hands.

Nothing wrong with him. But no reason he should be making this team every year either. Need to do better. 

It’s funny cause that’s what would happen 

 

1 minute ago, Sack that QB said:

Next question:

Since SF is looking for EDGEs, would you trade Sweat to SF for #31?

No. F them.

I would give them this however 🖕

2 minutes ago, CheesesteakNBeer said:

I agree with this. Our #1 goal based off of philosophy is rush the passer. Why not load up?

Yup. I’ve been saying if they have to move Sweat or Reddick then just use that money to get 2 rushers for the price of one and have a solid rotation. 

 

3 minutes ago, tuffstuff07 said:

Surprised he left Minnesota. Had Jefferson and Addison.

 

I guess now he gets Kyle Pitts and bijan but I couldn't tell you who their receivers are 

Drake London at WR. He has very nice weapons there. 

FWIW Jets fans absolute love Huff and are pissed he's gone. I always like to get a barometer from fans, it's usually accurate.

Just now, LeanMeanGM said:

 

I liked savage. I just don’t see the eagles paying McKinney the money he wants when they drafted brown and they like Blankenship 

3 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

It’s funny cause that’s what would happen 

 

True. 
 

Stat Graphic:

"Saquon this drive: 4 carries 65 yards, 2 catches 20 yards”…

then we

Sub Gainwell inside the 5, fumble. 

2 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

Give up on Pitts? 

Last 3 first round picks 

Pitts, London, Robinson 

I would Pitts is a bust, Bowers is all world and puts butts in those seats. He is legend here.

Nooooooooooo