1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So Lamb went at 17 why would you move to 9? 22 to 17 is probably fair if you really want a guy,but Im not trading my draft away 22 to 9 is a HUGE move

2024 please 

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Was Lamb(or JJ) "top tier"?

They are now because it's all  CRAP SHOOT

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So Lamb went at 17 why would you move to 9? 22 to 17 is probably fair if you really want a guy,but Im not trading my draft away 22 to 9 is a HUGE move

It’s just a second and a fifth…rounds we have multiple picks in already. Far from trading our whole draft away.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Here you go

Ok...you are trading up all that for a WR or TE?

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

It’s just a second and a fifth…rounds we have multiple picks in already. Far from trading our whole draft away.

But adding in that third next draft

3 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

2024 please 

Just showing there is no way to define "top tier". As you can see top tier guys went at 17 and 22(Lamb and JJ)

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

It’s just a second and a fifth…rounds we have multiple picks in already. Far from trading our whole draft away.

Next year's 3 too....you forgot that

Just now, joemas6 said:

Ok...you are trading up all that for a WR or TE?

I’d be willing to pay that price for any of those listed top tier prospects.

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Hust showing there is no way to define "top tier". As you can see top tier guys went at 17 and 22

Forget philosophy...it's 2024....are you trading up for a WR now?   You trading all that for a TE?

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’d be willing to pay that price for any of those listed top tier prospects.

So the answer is you would trade up for a WR?

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Just showing there is no way to define "top tier". As you can see top tier guys went at 17 and 22

It’s what you do preparing for the draft. Scout and rank. If you do a poor job identifying players nothing will help you in the draft anyway. I wouldn’t be shy about trading up for a Sauce Gardner or such players I coveted highly.

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

Forget philosophy...it's 2024....are you trading up for a WR now?   You trading all that for a TE?

It's not philosophy it's FACTS that 2 top tier WR's were taken at 17 and 22

Just now, joemas6 said:

So the answer is you would trade up for a WR?

Sure would. Really like all four of these guys. 

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

It’s what you do preparing for the draft. Scout and rank. If you do a poor job identifying players nothing will help you in the draft anyway. I wouldn’t be shy about trading up for a Sauce Gardner or such players I coveted highly.

Where was your boy Deebo selected?

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

It's not philosophy it's FACTS that 2 top tier WR's were taken at 17 and 22

And Tom Brady was taken day three.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’d be willing to pay that price for any of those listed top tier prospects.

See..i think you are saying this because you want a CB... you like the sizzle.  Then after the draft you are going to say ... see I called it, we could have had that CB.

So my counter... why wouldn't you do the trade when pick 9 goes on the clock so you can just pick your CB now.

You love Smith... and AJ... no shot you would trade for a WR here. 

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

And Tom Brady was taken day three.

Yeah but your giving away a 5th(even leaving the 2 out of it lol) which you said didn' t matter. Brady was a round 6

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Sure would. Really like all four of these guys. 

Only 3 QBs go top 9... both CBs...and the top 3 WRs... now you have the 4tb WR....you would trade up all those  picks for that guy?

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

See..i think you are saying this because you want a CB... you like the sizzle.  Then after the draft you are going to say ... see I called it, we could have had that CB.

So my counter... why wouldn't you do the trade when pick 9 goes on the clock so you can just pick your CB now.

You love Smith... and AJ... no shot you would trade for a WR here. 

Doing the trade while on the clock would be most optimal. But you are forgetting there are other teams bidding out there. That trade might not still be around by then. 

Just now, joemas6 said:

Only 3 QBs go top 9... both CBs...and the top 3 WRs... now you have the 4tb WR....you would trade up all those  picks for that guy?

Yep

SO I'm giving up JJ(or Lamb) and Brady for some unknown pick 9? That's smart? Ok then I'm stupid 

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yeah but your giving away a 5th which you said didn' t matter. Brady was a round 6

Kelce was day three as well. Don’t even think our big FA signing was drafted(Huff)

It would be worth it IF Howie traded up to 9,then traded back and got more than he gave. I could see him dong that because he's good at it

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

SO I'm giving up JJ(or Lamb) and Brady for some unknown pick 9? That's smart? Ok then I'm stupid 

You are welcome to look at things however you wish. I absolutely believe there are times worth trading up in the draft. You clearly would give away all of your first two days of picks to stack day three sure fire Hall of Famers. I can be in favor of trading back also. But my viewpoint isn’t that I won’t trade a day three pick because that guy could have been ToM Brady.

TBH,for the record,besides Harrison I did not look at #1 WR's because we DON'T NEED ONE. I looked at slot guys that are gettable If we moved up for WR3 or 4 who are you losing? Just curious