1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

He probably forgot it was so long ago...but I don’t think it was anything to do with your personal history...lol

So what all are you talking about this entire time then? Attacking me for holding up discussions because I didn’t provide personal insurance knowledge. Then turning around and siding with me believing there really can’t be any need for my answer for any point to be made.

Make your point. If whether I have car insurance…was the point being made…then I could at least understand that. But that’s not the case at all

52 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Unless the discussion is exactly about investment ..of course

You lost me. Care to elaborate?

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Probably as a courtesy and to keep the conversation flowing.

But that's ok... you made it clear that you aren't about a conversation at all. You don't want to be part of any discussion. It's not why you are on here. All good. You do you

What should have been made clear? If you are hearing what I’m saying is…insurance pisses me off. A huge problem with our society how out of control it’s become. How much it costs me in all its forms.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Go ahead No Mas. Why was my answer to my current car insurance possession crucial answer for the point to be made and stopped the conversation?

Your non answer stopped the conversation. If you gave the answer last week... the conversation would have continued

But you are asking me what another poster was going to say after your answer

How would I know...but I know he wasn't asking for personal information in his original question. Very simple yes ...and if asked for details... a " non of your business " response from you is very reasonable.

Just now, mattwill said:

You lost me. Care to elaborate?

I answered your question. I have car insurance. So please make your crucial point that I held you up from making because you weren’t supplied this answer.

No Mas attacking me for being so wrong…then turned around and belittled your question as having such an obvious answer to anyway. So even the guy defending you doesn’t believe in you at all with this.

53 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Funny part is I actually think our biggest investment there was in Darren Sproles which is the guy you actually missed.

Didn’t miss him. Just didn’t go back that far. He was both a Return Specialist and Gadget RB. I didn’t include Clement either.

Also my listing of Shady was a brain fart. Should have been Sanders.

5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Thank you…again…you also believe there was no need at all for me to answer that question

Never a need... unless you want to have a conversation with people as equals. Which you don't.

I was trying to explain this to Matt. That you don't like conversations...you like an audience and people to agree with you about everything.

Most people are on here for discussion and comradery... that's OK that you have a different purpose.

So what point are you making relying completely on knowledge about whether I currently am insured on my vehicles. I gave in…just for the good of the board.

1 minute ago, mattwill said:

Didn’t miss him. Just didn’t go back that far. He was both a Return Specialist and Gadget RB. I didn’t include Clement either.

Also my listing of Shady was a brain fart. Should have been Sanders.

Sproles was here with Ajayi and Blount you are forgetting

5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

What should have been made clear? If you are hearing what I’m saying is…insurance pisses me off. A huge problem with our society how out of control it’s become. How much it costs me in all its forms.

Nobody cares about insurance

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

No Mas attacking me for being so wrong…then turned around and belittled your question as having such an obvious answer to anyway. So even the guy defending you doesn’t believe in you at all with this.

No attack...simply stating a direct answer keeps the conversation flowing and is a courtesy.

1 minute ago, mattwill said:

Didn’t miss him. Just didn’t go back that far. He was both a Return Specialist and Gadget RB. I didn’t include Clement either.

Also my listing of Shady was a brain fart. Should have been Sanders.

Clement was undrafted. As low investment as there gets. Not really very far off from the investments in Ajayi or Blount though. Very minimal. Just pulling from memory. Can’t actually remember the specifics of what we gave for either RB. Confident enough it wasn’t anything significant…at all.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Sproles was here with Ajayi and Blount you are forgetting

He said he didn't want to go back that far....Shady ...he meant Sanders.

Pay attention

3 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Didn’t miss him. Just didn’t go back that far. He was both a Return Specialist and Gadget RB. I didn’t include Clement either.

Also my listing of Shady was a brain fart. Should have been Sanders.

Sanders was a second round pick. So he was a bad example for you have missed. Being he was the largest investment at the position to make your case based on. I’ll volunteer all this for your sake myself though.

5 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Didn’t miss him. Just didn’t go back that far. He was both a Return Specialist and Gadget RB. I didn’t include Clement either.

Also my listing of Shady was a brain fart. Should have been Sanders.

No Mas…read it again…it’s bad to just be incorrect. But just posting attempting to correct me when you ..yourself are wrong is really terrible

Who was the return man gadget player? Sproles.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

What was the investment in Swift? When are you expecting his induction in the HOF? Even the trade for Swift was pretty much after the fact anything better was out of the question. Even Swift was a one year rental.

The investment in Swift as reported by OTC.com was:

"Didn’t want to go back that far” then explaining talking about Sproles was a bad mistake by MW. Sproles was here at the same time. Sorry…but on the Eagles Board…messing up about Eagles roster deserves correction to be pointed out every time.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Ajayi? Really. The always injured never really did much RB. He did great for us to win the SB. Won’t take that away. But then brought him back…he as done. No investment in Ajayi. Laughable!!!! What all did we give up and all the pay we threw at Ajayi? Peanuts…but we salted them first!!!!

Sproles got injured and didn’t really assist winning the SB. So that part I get. Think he was the biggest investment of that RB group though. I’ll volunteer I don’t actually remember the specifics on each. Clement was undrafted. Most minimal investment possible. Confident there. Blount was thrown to the trash heap. So experienced and proven…but not a player we won some huge bidding war to acquire. Ajayi we acquired exactly because he was cheap. Had the sketchiest durability questions. Which exactly proved out to be accurate when we brought him back for the second season. Wasn’t it like bad knee(s) holding on by a thread basically?

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Blount was cast off from New England. Could have been grabbed by any team. We didn’t give him much either. Wasn’t he also a one year cheap rental? What investment? We literally got him because he was such a low investment…just like Ajayi

Again you show you don’t understand investment. The Eagles investment in Blount produced a ROI of LII

In addition they paid him more than any other team had.

13 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Never a need... unless you want to have a conversation with people as equals. Which you don't.

I was trying to explain this to Matt. That you don't like conversations...you like an audience and people to agree with you about everything.

Most people are on here for discussion and comradery... that's OK that you have a different purpose.

I enjoy thoughtful discussions. Used to be what occurred here. Plus plenty of other…by varying lunatics. Why I came here and still remain here. I’m not taking the fall for meaningful educated Eagles and football discussion disappearing. Feels much closer to I’m alone left attempting this…than anything else.

15 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Never a need... unless you want to have a conversation with people as equals. Which you don't.

I was trying to explain this to Matt. That you don't like conversations...you like an audience and people to agree with you about everything.

Most people are on here for discussion and comradery... that's OK that you have a different purpose.

Ok so what’s your meaningful decision contributions? You admit I volunteer plenty of deep thoughts and opinions everything Eagles. So where is your replies to any of that! Agree…disagree…any contribution towards meaningful discussion. Instead…all you bring is attacking me instead. No quality discussion attempt from you about any or all of this. Just lashing out at me blaming me over blocking discussion over my oh so critical answer …you called such obvious answer anyway.