15 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

What if Parsons gets hurt? And they went all in and fall short? Now you have no 1 picks for 2 years? How do you rebuild with no 1 picks? You would need to be extremely good to rebuild without them

They have the youngest team in the entire NFL. What’s not computing on this for several here? Good quality contending team that also the youngest.

56 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We’ll see if he can play outside

Not that worried about him on the outside playing inside CB is way harder considering they have to cover way more field no luxury as having the sideline to aid them…

5 hours ago, joemas6 said:

You completely whiffed on everything that was going on with him... simply because he had one year. And your agenda with Howie .. You chose not to follow the tea leaves, all the hints by the people covering the team... even ignored your own insistence of Fangio controlling his defense... it's a sickness really. But then all the left field ideas with zero proof ... anything that can be anti Howie, anti Siri...a frickin 6th round pick, 3rd string QB ....being able to demand a trade...GTFOH

Rosie wasn’t going to pay him. You seemed to have understood how and when Rosie extends every other players…early…

15 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LMAO a 180 from what you said before, we should "be like Dullaz"

Sure I did, not! I’ve been the guy prioritizing winning postseason games.

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Saquan had all time season…even got thrown an appreciation extra bonus money. Not half the money an elite outside CB makes. What’s not to understand? Study the actual contracts. NFL players

We’ll see if he can play outside. S I have little doubt about him doing well there.

Now we compare RB to CB? We know DeJean can play outside, he lined up there plenty of times last year as his guy moved there.

DeJean isn't the question...the question is who else they want on the field with him and Q.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

They have the youngest team in the entire NFL. What’s not computing on this for several here? Good quality contending team that also the youngest.

Why are you obsessed with " youngest " ?

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Rosie wasn’t going to pay him. You seemed to have understood how and when Rosie extends every other players…early…

Nobody was going to pay him... why is it difficult to understand???

5 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Booker was 5th ... you called it that they guy we traded him for will start at CB. Tou constantly " championed" the idea of secondary secondary secondary.... yet you complain about trading a 5th DT for a potential starting CB?

Why would that be.... other than to be contrarian and the agenda vs Howie. It's really old.

I champion…building the best championship complete roster as possible. Seems so very simple and obvious to me.

5 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Booker was 5th ... you called it that they guy we traded him for will start at CB. Tou constantly " championed" the idea of secondary secondary secondary.... yet you complain about trading a 5th DT for a potential starting CB?

Why would that be.... other than to be contrarian and the agenda vs Howie. It's really old.

Because we traded Booker…is why I’d assume Bennett would start. Not a great trade for us if he isn’t capable of that.

21 hours ago, joemas6 said:

So we agree the Packers went all in with this move trading for Parsons The investment in Parsons.. giving up the cap space and the 1st round picks... crippling their ability to " go in another direction" ...

It's a win now move.... not a " we need to see if our QB is good enough...so lets casually give out a $200 million contract and give away our next 2 first round picks.

There is nothing " to see here" Green Bay is all in.

Like they have nobody they can trade? Like if they aren’t totally sold on Love they can’t trade him? Or if doesn’t work out the next two years they can’t trade Parsons to recoup some? Why don’t you go look at their talented young roster? They have tons of talented players will be in their prime here..exactly why they felt it’s time to make that move. Love and Lefleur I believe are pretty good. But…track record is what it is. What really matters is do they have what it takes to win those most important games to advance to win it al?

32 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Now we compare RB to CB? We know DeJean can play outside, he lined up there plenty of times last year as his guy moved there.

DeJean isn't the question...the question is who else they want on the field with him and Q.

Position matters towards pay…is what it is…I blind man see that much easy enough

7 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I champion…building the best championship complete roster as possible. Seems so very simple and obvious to me.

Because we traded Booker…is why I’d assume Bennett would start. Not a great trade for us if he isn’t capable of that.

Like they have nobody they can trade? Like if they aren’t totally sold on Love they can’t trade him? Or if doesn’t work out the next two years they can’t trade Parsons to recoup some? Why don’t you go look at their talented young roster? They have tons of talented players will be in their prime here..exactly why they felt it’s time to make that move. Love and Lefleur I believe are pretty good. But…track record is what it is. What really matters is do they have what it takes to win those most important games to advance to win it al?

As tour stupidity rises to another record level... lets asses this genius post..

1. You champion building the best roster.... so that means a 5th DT is more valuable than lets say a backup CB? You realize Booker played 16% of the snaps... all garbage time last year. Dude was " starting" in July?????? There are no games in July. he was put in that spot for camp... he was the guy they wanted to get rid of as they want to keep the young guys with more potential behind him.

2. Which team would trade a 5th DT... and you would assume "because the other player would start" ??? bUt GB and Matt were the ones who overvalue our players???

3. Green Bay can just trade Love and Parsons if it doesn't work out?? Really... no effect on cap there? Plus if it doesn't work out, what happens to their trade value?

   Why do you post these idiotic things without thinking through?

25 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

As tour stupidity rises to another record level... lets asses this genius post..

1. You champion building the best roster.... so that means a 5th DT is more valuable than lets say a backup CB? You realize Booker played 16% of the snaps... all garbage time last year. Dude was " starting" in July?????? There are no games in July. he was put in that spot for camp... he was the guy they wanted to get rid of as they want to keep the young guys with more potential behind him.

2. Which team would trade a 5th DT... and you would assume "because the other player would start" ??? bUt GB and Matt were the ones who overvalue our players???

3. Green Bay can just trade Love and Parsons if it doesn't work out?? Really... no effect on cap there? Plus if it doesn't work out, what happens to their trade value?

   Why do you post these idiotic things without thinking through?

Booker was the guy,a very knowledgeable , defensive HC, Pete Carroll wanted. Ringo…I thought would work out…sounds like it’s not happening. We cut Ricks. Siri just announced Adoree as the starter. To me..this isn’t really a good thing. Want to be optimistic…but

2 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Nobody was going to pay him... why is it difficult to understand???

How much guaranteed money did Reddick have left? The guy without question played at a high level while here.

2 hours ago, joemas6 said:

As tour stupidity rises to another record level... lets asses this genius post..

1. You champion building the best roster.... so that means a 5th DT is more valuable than lets say a backup CB? You realize Booker played 16% of the snaps... all garbage time last year. Dude was " starting" in July?????? There are no games in July. he was put in that spot for camp... he was the guy they wanted to get rid of as they want to keep the young guys with more potential behind him.

2. Which team would trade a 5th DT... and you would assume "because the other player would start" ??? bUt GB and Matt were the ones who overvalue our players???

3. Green Bay can just trade Love and Parsons if it doesn't work out?? Really... no effect on cap there? Plus if it doesn't work out, what happens to their trade value?

   Why do you post these idiotic things without thinking through?

How was it a good idea to let Isaiah Rodgers go? Let’s begin there.

2 hours ago, joemas6 said:

As tour stupidity rises to another record level... lets asses this genius post..

1. You champion building the best roster.... so that means a 5th DT is more valuable than lets say a backup CB? You realize Booker played 16% of the snaps... all garbage time last year. Dude was " starting" in July?????? There are no games in July. he was put in that spot for camp... he was the guy they wanted to get rid of as they want to keep the young guys with more potential behind him.

2. Which team would trade a 5th DT... and you would assume "because the other player would start" ??? bUt GB and Matt were the ones who overvalue our players???

3. Green Bay can just trade Love and Parsons if it doesn't work out?? Really... no effect on cap there? Plus if it doesn't work out, what happens to their trade value?

   Why do you post these idiotic things without thinking through?

Booker I was telling you was looking nice ready for playing time last season. He was pushing for it. That was a very difficult rotation for anybody to crack.

Then with Carter out…he was the guy called on to start. Gabe Hall last season was PS guy.

You keep with this media depth chart very nonofficial depth chart. Ty they just put there based on? Potential more than contributor right away.

Seems like you really aren’t understanding those two aren’t the same player. There are different rolls and needs.

4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Sure I did, not! I’ve been the guy prioritizing winning postseason games.

LMAO last year you weren't sure we would make post season. All the worrying and whining. I bought you some cheese for that whine. BTW Hurts got married. 2-15. We need to be more like Dullaz, or SF. They do things right 🤣

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I champion…building the best championship complete roster as possible. Seems so very simple and obvious to me.

Because we traded Booker…is why I’d assume Bennett would start. Not a great trade for us if he isn’t capable of that.

Like they have nobody they can trade? Like if they aren’t totally sold on Love they can’t trade him? Or if doesn’t work out the next two years they can’t trade Parsons to recoup some? Why don’t you go look at their talented young roster? They have tons of talented players will be in their prime here..exactly why they felt it’s time to make that move. Love and Lefleur I believe are pretty good. But…track record is what it is. What really matters is do they have what it takes to win those most important games to advance to win it al?

LMAO

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Booker I was telling you was looking nice ready for playing time last season. He was pushing for it. That was a very difficult rotation for anybody to crack.

Then with Carter out…he was the guy called on to start. Gabe Hall last season was PS guy.

You keep with this media depth chart very nonofficial depth chart. Ty they just put there based on? Potential more than contributor right away.

Seems like you really aren’t understanding those two aren’t the same player. There are different rolls and needs.

I mean the raiders official team depth chart doesn’t even have booker in the top 4 for them….for a guy that was so ready you would think he would be starting or at least the 3rd DT for the raiders not like they are super stout on the interior.

It’s very clear that Booker wasn’t going to be a major piece for us this year clearly fell out of favor for other guys wouldn’t have traded a key rotational piece otherwise

3 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LMAO last year you weren't sure we would make post season. All the worrying and whining. I bought you some cheese for that whine. BTW Hurts got married. 2-15. We need to be more like Dullaz, or SF. They do things right 🤣

I said, never!

3 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LMAO last year you weren't sure we would make post season. All the worrying and whining. I bought you some cheese for that whine. BTW Hurts got married. 2-15. We need to be more like Dullaz, or SF. They do things right 🤣

This is total made up BS. I’m the guy identified Washington as going to be a problem. While you and No Mas both blew them off…you were worried about Dallas in fact.

I said the team to beat was the Lions. Stop just making up total BS.

2 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I mean the raiders official team depth chart doesn’t even have booker in the top 4 for them….for a guy that was so ready you would think he would be starting or at least the 3rd DT for the raiders not like they are super stout on the interior.

It’s very clear that Booker wasn’t going to be a major piece for us this year clearly fell out of favor for other guys wouldn’t have traded a key rotational piece otherwise

When did official depth charts get set for any team? You are talking about media depth chart…only thing anybodies put together until…the actual official depth chart comes out for this week.

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I said the team to beat was the Lions. Stop just making up total BS.

How so ham and cheese?

3 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LMAO last year you weren't sure we would make post season. All the worrying and whining. I bought you some cheese for that whine. BTW Hurts got married. 2-15. We need to be more like Dullaz, or SF. They do things right 🤣

One franchise who has 2 playoff wins since '96 I believe. Another franchise who can't get it done in the SB

1 hour ago, Godfather said:

One franchise who has 2 playoff wins since '96 I believe. Another franchise who can't get it done in the SB

Realize…it was him who talked up Dallas as the big competition. Really most saw it that way. I was unique in pointing out that Washington as a problem. That’s if we actually are dealing with truth and what was stated…by whom.

Picking #10 in my 12 team fantasy football league think I’m leaning Nico Collin’s with my first pick

No Landon Dickerson (knee) at practice today. Brett Toth taking reps at LG. Dickerson participated in Sunday’s practice. It was curious, then, to learn of his absence on Monday. Brett Toth was seen taking first-team left guard reps in Dickerson’s stead. After practice, it was revealed that Dickerson is now listed with a back injury … with no mention of his knee injury. Despite this unexpected development, it sounds like Dickerson still has a chance of starting against the Cowboys.

The Eagles listed two players under LIMITED PARTICIPATION: Andrew Mukuba and Joshua Uche.

Mukuba returned to practice on Sunday after previously missing time due to a hamstring injury. He might not yet be ready to play. Even if he is, it’s hard to envision him starting ahead of Sydney Brown in Week 1. But Mukuba could eventually take over for Brown.

https://www.bleedinggreennation.com/philadelphia-eagles-injuries/157176/eagles-injury-report-landon-dickerson-misses-practice-but-still-might-start-against-cowboys

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Realize…it was him who talked up Dallas as the big competition. Really most saw it that way. I was unique in pointing out that Washington as a problem. That’s if we actually are dealing with truth and what was stated…by whom.

Ham and cheese, what kind of medication are you on? Feta?