14 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’ve been very vocal about how I feel about really going hard by willing to trade all kinds of future draft picks when I feel it’s time to go All In.

For who are you trading????

9 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Going for an expensive cap player or using high picks..maybe multiple picks.

The Cowboy way. No thanks.

13 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Going for an expensive cap player or using high picks..maybe multiple picks.

So again... which move are you fearful of Howie giving up a high pick for an older player?

What in his history do you see that makes you think a type of move like that is going to happen?

14 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

First I just asked if you’d go All In this season? Do you believe we are just one player away from being a top contender?

Why does your mind wander into this stupidity?

This jack arse idea of " all in" or not .

The GM as always will make moves to try to balance out the short term and long term. Look at the players that left... why would he now pay big money for stop gaps?

Let's take your 2025 obsession of Rodgers at CB. 2 years 15 million. Fairly young guy. Why would he invest more in an older player now? If there is an investment there, it should be obvious it would be for a player that has better long term value.

When you manage the cap in a way to set up yhe ability to pay your upcoming star players... you don't worry about " all in" to an older expensive player.

Certainly you don't throw in a high pick as well.

JFC 🤣

14 hours ago, Senhorcook said:

I don’t have the time or energy to argue obvious points Cunningham. I’m sure you are a good person. I’m too busy with a job! I tried guys. I love the Eagles. I have no idea what’s going on with this team as I am not in their meetings. I don’t like the playcalling. I think the run game is WAY too basic. But what do I know? Apparently nothing. So my opinion isnt really needed here anymore clearly.

Run game coordinator is Stoutland... the runs have been the same for 5 years. When a play doesn't work... it's very simpleton mindset to blame the call.

Flip that to when we play defense... do you watch the game and blame the opposing OC every time we get a stop?

The players matter. The players on the lines matter most in what the rest of the guys have to then do. I think what you and a lot of other people don't appreciate about the 2024 team ....was that our lines were dominant. Not just good... not just very good..not just great.... but dominant.

Especially the OL.

13 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

This would be an All In trade

So let me ask... do you think a trade for a 26 year old in year 4...is " all in" for one year?

Or ...would this be a move for the long term?

I would view this move as a long term move. Not " all in one year"

13 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/25260628-jets-reportedly-want-lot-jermaine-johnson-ii-nfl-trade-talks

So why do you think the idea is " the Jets want a lot" for Johnson?

Could it be that he has long term value...not just for one year?

1 hour ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

JFC 🤣

I share your sentiments, and I don't often do it but I've resorted to the Ignore feature.

23 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I just know what the heck I’m talking about. No other way to sugar coat your answers reflect you don’t. On this subject…not trying to just tear you down here.

23 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Stuff like this is exactly why I have no problem whether I’m the lone opinion or not on some things. It wasn’t an Out …wasn’t a crossing route. It was a Post.

21 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Sirianni shared that Patullo had met with the offense, focusing on "efficiency on first and second downs to avoid third-and-long."

sirianni also said that one play was an out, not a post.

6 minutes ago, mattwill said:

It's nice... rah rah rah...etc. For me.. im not a fan of the soap opera part of the game.

I don't think anything gets " fixed" until the OL is healthy. I don't think anything is going to look good any time soon.

What i hope for...is getting a win or two before the bye and to limit any more injuries.

Meetings, culture, rah rah rah... that's not a substitute for physical domination that took place in 2024 by our OL.

Don't get me wrong, I think a winning " culture " is important, all the intangibles absolutely matter.

But the problem here isn't winning. We are 4-2. The issue all rhe ANALysts have is that we hsve to look good. Win by dominating 60 minutes.

I don't see this current roster doing that any time soon. Health and depth being the two key factors.

But hey...." the meeting went well," yippee!!!

What does the last two games have in common with 2023 finish???

We can't stop the run. That's a player thing. The other guy physically dominating you. The great O mind and the great D minds.... culture, meetings etc.... they don't matter when the other team is physically dominating you.

Right now, step 1 is we need to stop the run. Until then, everything else takes a back seat, because if we can't stop the run, we play uphill all game long.

That's the exact reason we have had success the last 3 or 4 years under Siri... while our play might look ugly... we have been able to run the ball or force teams to focus on stopping our run game.....and they have had to play uphill.

Limited possessions... make each failed possession that much more important. That's what we have had these last few years vs the opponent... it's flipped on us the last couple of weeks.

We gotta stop the run first. Then go from there

37 minutes ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

sirianni also said that one play was an out, not a post.

The Dotson part was an Out, but the AJ part? Not so much.

1 minute ago, mattwill said:

The Dotson part was an Out, but the AJ part? Not so much.

yeah, i'm just stirring the pot alittle.

13 minutes ago, mattwill said:

The Dotson part was an Out, but the AJ part? Not so much.

The AJ route was a TD pass that wasn't thrown. Really that is all we need to say about it.

2 hours ago, joemas6 said:

What does the last two games have in common with 2023 finish???

We can't stop the run. That's a player thing. The other guy physically dominating you. The great O mind and the great D minds.... culture, meetings etc.... they don't matter when the other team is physically dominating you.

Right now, step 1 is we need to stop the run. Until then, everything else takes a back seat, because if we can't stop the run, we play uphill all game long.

That's the exact reason we have had success the last 3 or 4 years under Siri... while our play might look ugly... we have been able to run the ball or force teams to focus on stopping our run game.....and they have had to play uphill.

Limited possessions... make each failed possession that much more important. That's what we have had these last few years vs the opponent... it's flipped on us the last couple of weeks.

We gotta stop the run first. Then go from there

Booker would have aided that much more than Bennett has

All you’ve been talking about is how great our run D was if Jordan Davis is in….hes been in.

3 hours ago, Alpha_TATEr said:

yeah, i'm just stirring the pot alittle.

I gave up my ladle

It was at that moment that Sirianni latched onto the mantra of "Players, Formations, Plays,”

Self admittance of zero thought of a scheme

WR Rashid Shaheed from the Saints might be up for trade

The question was whether you’d go All In this season?

38 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

The question was whether you’d go All In this season?

What do you think that would take? Or mean?