3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

It's an illustrative EXAMPLE which seems to be beyond your somprehension

So on an Out route…what should a player actually be doing to run that route when called upon?

The illustration directs very closely exactly what happens when that’s the job.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

AJ did his job..note this time….because he obviously hasn’t been always…slacked off very noticeably this season.

Been saying this since time began. If you don't INVOLVE your stars they will quit busting for you. Why should they make extra effort each play only to be ignored? They will make minimum effort because they are paid to,but you won't get any extra effort

33 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

So I proved exactly how you referred to AJ Route as an Out….like you denied. Let’s stay there until you just show whether you have the quality enough to admit you were wrong first.

You are confusing the word out with the diagram. I said the diagram described AJ‘s route go back and read the original comments.

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

It's an illustrative EXAMPLE which seems to be beyond your somprehension

So enlighten me about how an Out route should look any different from the illustration.

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Been saying this since time began. If you don't INVOLVE your stars they will quit busting for you. Why should they make extra effort each play only to be ignored? They will make minimum effort because they are paid to,but you won't get any extra effort

So this clearly you’d blame mostly on Siri, right?

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Been saying this since time began. If you don't INVOLVE your stars they will quit busting for you. Why should they make extra effort each play only to be ignored? They will make minimum effort because they are paid to,but you won't get any extra effort

Who dialed back throwing to AJ last season over risk adversity reasoning?

1 minute ago, mattwill said:

You are confusing the word out with the diagram. I said the diagram described AJ‘s route go back and read the original comments.

I literally flat out have been in detail describing the route. So yeah I even capitalize Out talking about it.

18 hours ago, mattwill said:

Notice how that’s exactly what AJ‘s route looked like

Looked like

Can you read English?

2 minutes ago, mattwill said:

You are confusing the word out with the diagram. I said the diagram described AJ‘s route go back and read the original comments.

Any and every version about this your just flat out wrong

Just now, mattwill said:

Looked like

Can you read English?

Do you pay attention to football?

1 minute ago, mattwill said:

Looked like

Can you read English?

Looked exactly like a Post…which it’s called

1 minute ago, mattwill said:

Looked like

Can you read English?

Every way you try to take what you said doesn’t make sense. It didn’t look like it…or it wasn’t the route he ran. Did AJ square up after his cut going horizontal? Or towards the endzone?

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

I literally flat out have been in detail describing the route. So yeah I even capitalize Out talking about it.

You are confusing words with pictures

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Looked exactly like a Post…which it’s called

No, looked like a deep cross

An Out doesn’t go upfield…unless you run it lazy like Dotson did right there.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Every way you try to take what you said doesn’t make sense. It didn’t look like it…or it wasn’t the route he ran. Did AJ square up after his cut going horizontal? Or towards the endzone?

Squared up

Just now, mattwill said:

You are confusing words with pictures

No, looked like a deep cross

I just know what the heck I’m talking about. No other way to sugar coat your answers reflect you don’t. On this subject…not trying to just tear you down here.

1 minute ago, mattwill said:

Squared up

You just really like be pushing forward on terrible opinions you share. You double down….no matter what.

Stuff like this is exactly why I have no problem whether I’m the lone opinion or not on some things. It wasn’t an Out …wasn’t a crossing route. It was a Post.

Sirianni shared that Patullo had met with the offense, focusing on "efficiency on first and second downs to avoid third-and-long."

A big thing would be to get the running game going, something that Patullo has struggled to do with sticking to the running game. Barkley had over 30 yards rushing on the first drive of the Giants game, but finished with 58 yards. Patullo once again abandoned the running game when it was working. —-from an article I ran across I just copied and pasted this statement.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

A big thing would be to get the running game going, something that Patullo has struggled to do with sticking to the running game. Barkley had over 30 yards rushing on the first drive of the Giants game, but finished with 58 yards. Patullo once again abandoned the running game when it was working. —-from an article I ran across I just copied and pasted this statement.

See I really not alone…just am in this one location.

Pretty much what’s been going on that started in the SB. Maybe DCs felt Spags laid out part of a blueprint.

Where Saquan rushing changed from being such a huge boost to the rest of the O….to pretty much something to overcome instead. Too much relying on tough down and distance situations for Hurts and the others to overcome.

This whole logic was part of the reason Siri wasn’t in favor of Sanders initial running style. He preached north and south ..one cut rushing style. All about keeping us in good down and distance standing.