4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We aren’t a rebuilding team with time to develop and suffer an unqualified OC.

He's been here 5 years. You are saying he wasn't vetted?

4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Issue is these issues have existed while Patullo was here as passing game coordinator. So …how much time you giving Patullo to judge whether he is good enough or not?

As much time as Lurie wants. I don't fire people ,neither do you

4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We are very much a win now team and situation

We're winning now? After 4 games we should be 10-0? LOL

4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

That’s a cover story. It’s flat out worse and weaker…and not even a shell of what we just had last season:

Basically ALL the same guys on offense?

4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I thought he did good," Fangio said on Tuesday. "I mean, he can be better, the true test for him will be to see how he improves, but overall, he did good. He was pretty sticky in man coverage. I'd like to see his tackling improve. One thing a guy has to learn that has played predominantly special teams is tackling on defense is a lot different than tackling in special teams. But I'm confident he can improve that." 

Care to enlighten us as to who is is talking about or should we just guess? LOL

4 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Does Evans play defense,

You keep hammering that we lost to TB before because we didn't have AJ. Does AJ play defense?

4 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Remind me who won the Superbowl last year...and remind me what you thought our record would be at this point?

IDK I never guessed what our record would be at this point. All I said was our first 5 games are tough,so I have zero clue who you are talking about. So far I have posted Eagles wins on EVERY week of Matts board?

3 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Sure you can.. go on your ESPN Fantasy site... look at flex players... week 4 stats...click targets and you can see very easily.

Idk if you played fantasy before they have what is called " add/ drops... you can research players stats from weeks prior to see if they are worth considering to add to your roster. For me, I look at targets as one of the factors in determining if that player is worth it.

Yeah I'm going to do that for every player, you look it up. I posted a link that shows more targets for other top guys. Whats even more insane is the yards they got as opposed to AJ. 151 over 4 games and one game was 109,which is a whopping 42 yards in 3 other games. combined

3 hours ago, joemas6 said:

9 targets... would be 153 targets for the season. Did you check yet to see how many guys got that 9 targets week 4.

I already posted that link,go back and read it. I'm not doing a damn spread sheet for you. If he gets 40 targets a game and totals 3 yards who really cares???? The fact is,we have no deep threat until Hurts proves otherwise. I would rather he have 3 targets per game for 40 yards each. Our deep threat doesn't exist

4 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Sure you can.. go on your ESPN Fantasy site... look at flex players... week 4 stats...click targets and you can see very easily.

Idk if you played fantasy before they have what is called " add/ drops... you can research players stats from weeks prior to see if they are worth considering to add to your roster. For me, I look at targets as one of the factors in determining if that player is worth it.

You should also look at receptions and yardage

3 hours ago, mattwill said:

What evidence do you have that supports that opinion of yours?

PG-Precision Guesswork

2 hours ago, Senhorcook said:

No disrespect, but why are you so hell bent about this? Smith has not said a word. Dude is a stud. AJ is a stud. He shared some frustrations.

I was very frustrated during and immediately after the game about how pathetic the passing game is. But I was even more concerned about the poor running game for a team known for its talented OLine and the best RB in football. Barkley isn’t whining.

I’m worried the lack of effectiveness is going to catch up to this team, OR they will get some things figured out.

Just saying, you have posted 100 times or so the SAME message. We got it! How about sharing some things you’d like to see the team do? You have and make great points. I do agree with a lot you say, so no need to get pissed at me. We are all Eagles fans here.

I never said a thing about Smitty saying anything.. I keep trying to move on about it,but others keep bugging me with the same posts I already answered. The rest of your post is what I also said. So since you brought it up I have to post about it AGAIN. so make it 101 times now

34-24 Eagles. IDK why you give credit for fake "layups" Brett Favre has no picks or TD's Barry Sanders has no stats either @mattwill

32 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

You keep hammering that we lost to TB before because we didn't have AJ. Does AJ play defense?

So look at the 6 games Hurts vs Bowles....I assume we are talking about these games right?

2-4.. AJ 2-0... 25 and 31 points.

O-4 without AJ.... no where close to that scoring. AJ by just being there, draws the attention. Changes the strategy.

The big thing they are talking about in the film review. Tampa blitzed first half... we moved the ball and burnt them on the blitz.

The other games without AJ... Hurts couldn't do anything. They pressed up our WRs and squeezed him . Nothing was there.

AJ changes that whole narrative...the Tampa matchup is the epitome of that!

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

34-24 Eagles. IDK why you give credit for fake "layups" Brett Favre has no picks or TD's Barry Sanders has no stats either @mattwill

So I will try again 34-24 Eagles- Smitty and Goedert each have a TD @mattwill

Just now, joemas6 said:

So look at the 6 games Hurts vs Bowles....I assume we are talking about these games right?

2-4.. AJ 2-0... 25 and 31 points.

O-4 without AJ.... no where close to that scoring. AJ by just being there, draws the attention. Changes the strategy.

The big thing they are talking about in the film review. Tampa blitzed first half... we moved the ball and burnt them on the blitz.

The other games without AJ... Hurts couldn't do anything. They pressed up our WRs and squeezed him . Nothing was there.

AJ changes that whole narrative...the Tampa matchup is the epitome of that!

I'm moving on from this. On to Denver

35 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

IDK I never guessed what our record would be at this point. All I said was our first 5 games are tough,so I have zero clue who you are talking about. So far I have posted Eagles wins on EVERY week of Matts board?

How have the scores been....tell me if you had the offense scoring more or our defense giving up less each week than what actually happened?

My point... is which side is really surpassing expectations?

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So I will try again 34-24 Eagles Smitty and Goedert each have a TD @mattwill

You got 34 on rhe Denver D? With your lack of confidence in the offense, you got what a lot of people think is the best defense in the league...we put up 34? Wow!

33 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yeah I'm going to do that for every player, you look it up. I posted a link that shows more targets for other top guys. Whats even more insane is the yards they got as opposed to AJ. 151 over 4 games and one game was 109,which is a whopping 42 yards in 3 other games. combined

Lol... you don't have to " look up " every player.

Go to " players" ..go to Flex... go to the left and put all ( so it's not just fantasy free agents... go to the right toward the passing stats...and click targets.. then ALL of the WR, RB, TE targets will be there in order. Top to bottom.

Oops...also on top left click week 4.

Takes literally 5 quick clicks. You should know how to do this when researching add and drops. Very simple tool to get all the information.

I'm assuming you played fantasy before...all these websites have " targets" now. Very easy to see targets, catches, yards, rushing attempts, yards, passing attempts, yards...etc.

Every player is right there...no need to go team by team.

38 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I already posted that link,go back and read it. I'm not doing a damn spread sheet for you. If he gets 40 targets a game and totals 3 yards who really cares???? The fact is,we have no deep threat until Hurts proves otherwise. I would rather he have 3 targets per game for 40 yards each. Our deep threat doesn't exist

GB... cslm down. Fantasy websites have easy access to ALL the stats. I assumed you knew this being that you have played for years. I just assumed you knew where to click and find easy information.

30 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

You should also look at receptions and yardage

Which is a good responsibility of the player himself to produce. Targets and attempts is what i would use to show how the team is calling plays for that player.

15 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I'm moving on from this. On to Denver

Well AJ will have probably the best CB on him this week... I hope he magically gets catches... the play call and QB can target him...but he is going to have to get open. Twitter isn't going to help do that.

34 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

You should also look at receptions and yardage

You want a theory from me... AJ disengages when he feels we can win without him. When we get leads...etc.

But look how all of a sudden he seems to run those crisp routes and catches in traffic vs the Rams when we need him.

Makes the game clinching catch vs Dallas at the end.

I feel AJ has a flaw... of having to be " needed" It's not about being wanted...but he needs to be needed.

He got his championship. It's a new season and he probably realizes the team can absolutely win without him having big stats... I don't think he actually came to the realization until after the NFC title abd Superbowl blowouts.

In the back of his mind...I believe he is like Ham in the thinking that " we can win week 6 without me dominating " but we will NEED me at the end" and 95 points in 7 quarters at the end without much from him...was an eye opener.

Some people have an issue, or don't have the satisfaction of simply winning. They need to feel needed or it just isn't satisfying.

2 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Well AJ will have probably the best CB on him this week... I hope he magically gets catches... the play call and QB can target him...but he is going to have to get open. Twitter isn't going to help do that.

Yeah, true, but we have Smitty and Goedert and possibly we see some passes to Shipley. That bum Gainwell lit it this week

2 hours ago, joemas6 said:

I feel AJ has a flaw... of having to be " needed" It's not about being wanted...but he needs to be needed.

I can agree with this